Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Awesome headers! I am sure they will work great for the 6.0L K-10 I am building! When can I get a set?
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
hi, welcome to the boards from crockett, texas
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Hey Jaime, if you end up selling any of these to someone with an ECE GenIII motor mount setup like Rob and I use and they fit really well, please let me know :)
This is of obvious interest to me. |
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Quote:
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
SSSSSWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEETTTTTTT! I'll be home Thursday night.
:metal::metal::metal::metal::metal::metal::metal::metal::metal: |
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Quote:
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Welcome to the board!! from Minnesota
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Rob,
Are you headed back to FLA? Let me know, I would like to see how they fit on your truck. |
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Quote:
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Watching this...
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Welcome From Knoxville Tn!!!
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Jamie-
Can you tell if these might fit with a boxed in frame? My S&Ps get into the frame rail. Thanks, Whit |
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Right on welcome to the board from the desert of Hesperia !!
Me and my boss Ray use your headers on our long travel cars... Cool to see you have interest in the chevy trucks !!!!! http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...gyworks006.jpg http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...gyworks039.jpg http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...gyworks042.jpg ^^^^^^^ Desert Rat Buggies built... So would this header design work on a 81 with 5.3l vortec ?? I have a 81 brick that i want to do a swap in...and since we are a distributor for your products, I was thinking of getting a set... :chevy: |
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Welcome aboard from Shawnee, KS!
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Quote:
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Welcome from South Carolina. Sweeeet truck!!!
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for all the welcomes, ya'll Jamie |
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Jamie-
I've purchase quite a few headers recently and am amazed at how they show up and curious why companies make the decisions they do. Maybe you can help me understand. I just bought some S&P headers for my 72 K10 and was surprised at a couple of things. They are using 5/16 flanges and thin wall tubing. Is it weight or cost that sends them in this direction? Also, on the inside of one of the tubes there is an insert which looks to be used to join two pieces of tubing together. This seems very wrong to me, can you comment? They grind the weld on the ports smooth which looks killer and should be good for flow but then they leave a chunk of metal in the middle of the pipe? I'm thinking the S&Ps are more about looks than function. I have Sanderson Headers on my Jeep and they went with thick tubing and flanges but they have a goofy weld around all the ports and you are supposed to use sealant rather than a gasket. Maybe I'm old fashioned but this seems like a leak waiting to happen. Any comments? Had some cheap Hedman's. Nothing good there. And at the bottom of my list was a set of Flowtech. I got what I paid for on those beasts. BTW, I used Thorley's on my Grand Cherokee and was very happy. Very solid, good welds and fit well. Thanks, Whit |
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Quote:
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
I didn't see any sleeves on your headers, how do you avoid using them? Or are they just hidden around bends? How common is that practice?
Whit Quote:
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Not common at all. These are normally used by a fabricator that is making a one off. It's supposed to make it easier to center the two pieces of pipe. Is it tig welded? This is picture of the sleeve that brand-x uses... |
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
3 Attachment(s)
The strange thing is that the coupler is right in the middle of a straight piece of tubing. There are bends on each end of the tube but I'm not sure why this isn't a single piece. The tube in question is the longest of the 4, not sure why it is any different then the other tubes. I assume it is tig welded but you can't tell because the welds are all ground smooth. The cool flanges and the way they ground the ports was the reason I bought these units. It's a real nice looking header but there is an ugly secret inside. Why grind the inlets to perfection and then leave a honking piece of metel inside? You should be able to see the sleeve in the following pics.
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Quote:
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
That's exactly what it looks like. Only the longest tube on each header is done this way. Looks like they started with a J-bend and mandrel bent the other end on the rest. I'm guessing the straight part on the J-bend was not long enough to make the long tube in one piece. I understand cutting some time by purchasing J-bends for the places you can use them. But if you are set up with a mandrel bender wouldn't it be easier to make a double bend on a straight piece rather than slop two pieces together? They did grind the weld smooth on the outside so it looks pretty. AKA, whip cream on sh__
Thanks, Whit Quote:
|
Re: '67 project nightmare ls1 swap
Welcome Jamie. Im Also A New Member. Im Doing My Build Right Now On A 72c10,5.3,4l60.im Using The Same Engine/trans Mount Set Up From Cpp. I Wish I Would Have Known That There Are No Headers Out Right Now That Will Work With There Set Up.they Forgot About That I Guess. So I Sure Am Glad I Found Your Set. I Will Be Contacting You Very Soon To Get A Set. Thanks. Kevin
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com