Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

must have something to do with trying to prove their manhood!
ron

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

I wouldn't think it would be much different than putting an LS in a 63-66.
But I did a search and found a few threads on topic:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=667010

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

Wait I just read this thread title is 73-87 never mind! Lol

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

My reason was actually quite simple. 11 years less abuse on the frame and suspension plus disk brakes, power steering, and leaf springs. Only thing required was lift the old cab up, and roll the new stuff under it.
The swap is really quite simple. Bolt the body mounts to the cab, drop the cab onto the frame, weld the mounts to the frame. Done.

Eric

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

frames are very seldom a problem. most of these swaps are made with boxes on them and most do not alter the w/base to have the tires centred properly which looks a little hokey.
ron

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

that is what the guy did to this suburban from page one, just drop thr body on the frame and adapted.
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/160...1109221526.jpg
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/160...1109221527.jpg
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/160...1109221526.jpg
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/160...1109221751.jpg
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/160...1109221750.jpg
and this was a suburban not just a c & c with a flatdeck
bet he didn't spend that much time on it
ron

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

"Robust"

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

Wingnuts???
WINGNUTS!!!
Wow.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

The wingnuts allow quick cab removal for easy cleaning. ;):chevy:

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

I can tell you are pretty passionate about this topic, may I ask why it bothers you so much? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't your truck have an earlier frame swapped in?

If I desired to own a 4x4 60-66 this is likely the route I would take. If I had a truck with a damaged frame and the only replacement I could find was a later model, I possibly would try this route was well.

The person you are mocking has a good looking truck. From the pictures he provided the work appears well done. I don't understand the disgruntlement in how others choose to build their trucks.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

You're right, that was rude of me. I apologize.
.
For a 4x4, it may be the simplest route.
But for disc brakes and power steering on a 2wd it's best to use one's original frame.
But yes, it bothers me because those who encourage others to do it aren't giving sound advice.
My 65 is on a 62 gmc frame. I did it after I totaled it in the 80's. I was 18 and didn't know better.

My frame was wrecked. The entire frame is destroyed. I needed a frame and I found an 83 next door without one spot of rust. Easy decision
Posted via Mobile Device

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

I can respect that opinion. If ones frame was solid and they only wanted updated suspension, braking etc, there are definitely easier, less intrusive options, but every situation can't be covered under that blanket statement. I'll use this next quote as my example.

The fact you where able to get your hands on that frame is likely the only reason your truck is still on the road today. While not ideal, if I didn't have any other options for getting my truck back on the road besides a frame swap...I'd take it.

In my opinion someone showing others it is possible to get good results swapping frames doesn't constitute giving bad advice.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

Some one did a little rigging there.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

You guys do realize the point of this thread isn't for those who Need a new frame. It's for those that think it's the easier route for the upgrades the 2 wheel drive guys want. To swap out the original frame for the upgrades isn't a practical route.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

You do realize that the information contained in a thread on a public forum can be used for other purposes than those intended?

This thread has been bumped multiple times over the years, each time by people looking for more information, the most recent by someone who admits they have a damaged frame. I don't see where I'm off topic here

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

I surely don't want to get into a pissing match. But I do deserve it.
But for the original purpose of this thread, aligned with what is the purpose for swapping frames, if ones frame is good, there is absolutely no advantage to go to the newer frame. That was the point of my post. Body mounts, frame contour, frame horns, and especially VIN.
But I understand I deserve your method of replies because of my snarky reply to another member.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

I'm absolutely not trying to get into a pissing match either, and no you don't deserve it.
We are all here for the same reason and we all bring something different to the table. We need to be able to share opinions, experiences and be able to disagree without it turning ugly....we are better than politicians;).

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

Thank you!
My bad.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

Oh boy i thought you almost opened a can of worms man.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

I would never swap to a square body frame for 2 wheel drive. 4wd on the other hand, would do it again in a heartbeat

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

I'm going to start a thread where I overlay different frames with the 63-66 frame along with a greyscale of the cab and such so we can visually see see where things line up or not.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

Now this is an interesting swap:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=688570

.

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

What about our body on a 1999 or newer LS equipped frame?

Re: '60-'66 Body On A '73-'87 Frame
 

this is how the fellow compensated for the frame difference on the back end of this one
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/160...1109221750.jpg
ron