The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   Suspension (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Trailing arm option (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=815947)

Speedracer39 12-21-2020 01:32 PM

Trailing arm option
 
I am wondering those that have replaced the factory trailing arms did you use a newer style with johnny joint ends and what are your opinions on using them?

lolife99 12-21-2020 01:43 PM

Re: Trailing arm option
 
1 Attachment(s)
I highly recommend these from Tinworks Fabrication.
Excellent Quality and customer service.
https://tinworksfabrication.com/prod...y-truck/63-72/

SeanB242 12-21-2020 03:54 PM

Re: Trailing arm option
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lolife99 (Post 8852762)
I highly recommend these from Tinworks Fabrication.
Excellent Quality and customer service.
https://tinworksfabrication.com/prod...y-truck/63-72/

Second this. Put them on sons truck. Really nice.

Speedracer39 12-21-2020 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeanB242 (Post 8852821)
Second this. Put them on sons truck. Really nice.

Posted via Mobile Device

Speedracer39 12-21-2020 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speedracer39 (Post 8852843)
Posted via Mobile Device

Is there a advantage of having a Johnny joint over a stock bushing?
Posted via Mobile Device

lolife99 12-21-2020 10:35 PM

Re: Trailing arm option
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Speedracer39 (Post 8852845)
Is there a advantage of having a Johnny joint over a stock bushing?
Posted via Mobile Device

There’s not much if any articulation in the stock bushing.
The I-beam design of the stock trailing arm allowed it to twist.
When you build a solid trailing arm (round or square tube) it has to have a flexible joint at the front.

Speedracer39 12-22-2020 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lolife99 (Post 8853028)
There’s not much if any articulation in the stock bushing.
The I-beam design of the stock trailing arm allowed it to twist.
When you build a solid trailing arm (round or square tube) it has to have a flexible joint at the front.

Posted via Mobile Device

Speedracer39 12-22-2020 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speedracer39 (Post 8853180)
Posted via Mobile Device

Thanks for the explanation.
Posted via Mobile Device

SCOTI 12-23-2020 11:10 AM

Re: Trailing arm option
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lolife99 (Post 8853028)
There’s not much if any articulation in the stock bushing.
The I-beam design of the stock trailing arm allowed it to twist.
When you build a solid trailing arm (round or square tube) it has to have a flexible joint at the front.

Well..... It doesn't have to. There have been multiple options out there w/poly bushings. But those options built using square/round tubing w/poly bushings will definitely bind before the stock stuff would.
I think of it as going from Radials to Bias-Ply tires (backwards in functionality).

The combo of the original I-beam construction, length, orientation, & the front rubber bushings made them compliant enough to survive. Start changing some of those dynamics & it will possibly impact the effectiveness on the others.

If you're choosing aftermarket tubular constructed Truck-Arms, they need to have a spherical joint to work better than what came form GM.

lolife99 12-23-2020 05:47 PM

Re: Trailing arm option
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SCOTI (Post 8853658)
Well..... It doesn't have to. There have been multiple options out there w/poly bushings. But those options built using square/round tubing w/poly bushings will definitely bind before the stock stuff would.
I think of it as going from Radials to Bias-Ply tires (backwards in functionality).

The combo of the original I-beam construction, length, orientation, & the front rubber bushings made them compliant enough to survive. Start changing some of those dynamics & it will possibly impact the effectiveness on the others.

If you're choosing aftermarket tubular constructed Truck-Arms, they need to have a spherical joint to work better than what came form GM.

Thanks for the CORRECT explanation.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com