The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Head ID 3917215 (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=803713)

thirstybob 04-04-2020 08:59 AM

Head ID 3917215
 
I was surprised to see these on my truck. Can anyone tell me whether or not there is any benefit to having these heads on my '74 C20/454? The engine runs really well, nothing fancy.
The casting numbers are 3917215. I understand they are from a 68-69 396/427.
Closed chamber (I don't know what the means)
Are they beneficial for performance or no?

geezer#99 04-04-2020 11:39 AM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
More performance is possible due to the increase in compression ratio.
But that depends which pistons you have.
Here’s a thread that will help explain things.

https://www.hotrodders.com/forum/dif...ads-62689.html

thirstybob 04-04-2020 11:43 AM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
Good info. Thanks for the reply.

thirstybob 04-04-2020 01:02 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
Would you happen to know if I should try and increase the valve size? If so, how big can I go? I understand that close port heads have the ability for increased compression which is good? Will larger than stock valves be of any benefit?
My goal is to get as much respectable performance as possible in a low budget kind of way, working with what I have.
Currently, Edelbrock 1407, Performer manifold, true duals, stock exhaust manifolds, stock 14 bolt FF, TH400.
My next purchase is headers, H pipe and complete exhaust.

geezer#99 04-04-2020 01:24 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
Likely not worth the time and expense!
If your motor spent most of it’s time over 5 grand it might help. Then better flow needs a bigger/better cam.
Headers can be the biggest hp adder for a bbc.
Many years ago a buddy and I built an L88 for a 72 nova. Had to use stock cast cast iron manifolds. No room for headers, even 1 7/8 inch ones.
We did a sub frame swap to a front steer 76 nova set up. Had lots of room then. 1 7/8 headers added 50 easy horses. Going even bigger to a custom built set of 2 1/4 inch headers added another 50 horses.
BBC luv headers.

geezer#99 04-04-2020 01:25 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
What’s you un for timing on your bbc?

thirstybob 04-04-2020 01:30 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geezer#99 (Post 8708635)
Likely not worth the time and expense!
If your motor spent most of it’s time over 5 grand it might help. Then better flow needs a bigger/better cam.
Headers can be the biggest hp adder for a bbc.
Many years ago a buddy and I built an L88 for a 72 nova. Had to use stock cast cast iron manifolds. No room for headers, even 1 7/8 inch ones.
We did a sub frame swap to a front steer 76 nova set up. Had lots of room then. 1 7/8 headers added 50 easy horses. Going even bigger to a custom built set of 2 1/4 inch headers added another 50 horses.
BBC luv headers.

Ok, cool. Would you suggest a bigger cam? At this stage, I'm only interested in my butt dyno so there will be no "serious" tuning going on, yet.

geezer#99 04-04-2020 01:52 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
depends What cam you have now.
If it’s stock it’ll run out of breath at 4500 rpm. Good for torque and mileage though.
A bit tricky swapping cams though. The bbc is known for eating cam lobes. The other problem you might have is a different cam may need piston mods to clear the lift.
Headers are the biggest bang for the buck.
Second best bang is timing curve. Especially at your elevation.

thirstybob 04-04-2020 01:55 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geezer#99 (Post 8708637)
what’s you un for timing on your bbc?

14 btdc

thirstybob 04-04-2020 01:57 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geezer#99 (Post 8708653)
depends What cam you have now.
If it’s stock it’ll run out of breath at 4500 rpm. Good for torque and mileage though.
A bit tricky swapping cams though. The bbc is known for eating cam lobes. The other problem you might have is a different cam may need piston mods to clear the lift.
Headers are the biggest bang for the buck.
Second best bang is timing curve. Especially at your elevation.

Gotcha. I believe it has an RV cam but I don't know for sure. I have a fair amount of low end torque.
Do you think 3" exhaust all the way back would hurt anything?

geezer#99 04-04-2020 02:10 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
I’ve never been one for big pipes.
2 1/2 inch is adequate if you limit the bends.
Depends a lot on room for bigger pipes and budget.

thirstybob 04-04-2020 02:14 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geezer#99 (Post 8708674)
I’ve never been one for big pipes.
2 1/2 inch is adequate if you limit the bends.
Depends a lot on room for bigger pipes and budget.

Thanks Geezer, for taking the time to share your knowledge. I'm sure I'll have more questions at a later time. I do appreciate you.

68c10owner 04-05-2020 04:39 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
With flat top pistons those heads usually give about 9.5:1 compression which is perfect. The smaller valves were great in engines like this. Once you start running more camshaft and winding it up higher you might see a increase in performance. Stock is 2.065/1.72 and the factory big valve heads use 2.19/1.72 on the closed chambers and 2.19/1.88 on the open chambers. You would possibly see a difference with some mild pocket porting and bowl work but stock they will perform well

thirstybob 04-05-2020 05:28 PM

Re: Head ID 3917215
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 68c10owner (Post 8709707)
With flat top pistons those heads usually give about 9.5:1 compression which is perfect. The smaller valves were great in engines like this. Once you start running more camshaft and winding it up higher you might see a increase in performance. Stock is 2.065/1.72 and the factory big valve heads use 2.19/1.72 on the closed chambers and 2.19/1.88 on the open chambers. You would possibly see a difference with some mild pocket porting and bowl work but stock they will perform well

Thanks for the input. It runs really well but I think it can do better with some minor messaging. It is (or I thought it was) bone stock and complete. No leaks, no smoke. Compression is 160, give or take, across the board with a constant 15 vacuum. I'll eventually tear it down and do some nasty mods but for now, headers.
You guys are a great help! Stay safe and healthy!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com