View Single Post
Old 12-05-2010, 11:59 PM   #11
kevinr1970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
Re: 1/2 ton 4x4 vs 2wd rear-end

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElGracho View Post
I was trying to summarize. That's what I meant by big flick, big picture etc...

I meant suburban and blazer when I mentioned 88-91. They are really common in the u-pull-it yards now and the last rear I got came from one of those.

I hadn't seen that diesel, I'll have to take a look....
I hadn't even thought about '88-91 Bl/urbans, good info to know that they are different!

Here is that diesel swb.
Seems a lot of money from my perspective, but I am not really into the diesels.
I will list the ad here as it only has a few days left:
"Rare hard to find 85 K10 with 6.2 diesel. Truck runs and drives well. 119K New Automatic transmission with overdrive. Over 20 MPG! Truck is not perfect does have a dent in the bed and a little rust in the passenger rocker panel. 360-xxx-xxxx"
Attached Images
 
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg)
2000 Tahoe Limited
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now
1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd
1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold)
kevinr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote