View Single Post
Old 07-11-2011, 10:24 AM   #72
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: Official Difference btween the 396 and 402 BB Because you asked.

Quote:
Originally Posted by special-K View Post
Why single out the 396 to 402? There were 283s,327s,396s,and 427s. Then they all got bumped up: 283 to 307,327 to 350,396 to 402,and 427 to 454. It was always my understanding this was due to federal emissions regulations kicking in (EPA had just come into existence in '69). They dropped compression ratios and increased displacement. Then there was the smog pump added. The other car companies did the same thing. I figured they jumped the displacement up to compensate choking them out for emissions. It was years later when they started actually building emissions efficiency "into" engines instead of building it "onto" them.
GM didn't drop compression in 1970. The 375 HP 396 (that was actually a 402) still had 11 : 1 CR that year. Bumping up the cubes happened all the time, but they never put a 350 in car, printed 327 on the SPID, and put 340 fender emblems on it!
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote