Thread: project 86
View Single Post
Old 12-03-2013, 01:57 PM   #261
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,926
Re: project 86

Quote:
Originally Posted by king-918 View Post
Just in

Chris,

Im not sure what you mean by collapse the bushing.... you want the nuts to be tight on the washers, which are tight on the sleeves, so the arm will pivot on the metal sleeve, you do not want the washer rubbing on the bushing very hard, just touching barely, you do not want a ton of friction there, it just wears the bushings sooner.


Taylor
Correct. I trimmed them so there would be pressure @ the sleeve & minimal contact @ the bushing so the arm would resist fore/aft shifting. Basically the sleeve was longer than the bushing which didn't allow full thread engagement on the cross-shaft nut as well as a gap between the bushing & retaining washer.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote