View Single Post
Old 10-25-2016, 12:45 PM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,923
Re: Went for an alignment- positive camber& no shims

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryangreen19 View Post
I recently finished re-building the entire front end of my 68 c10, I swapped spindles out of an 85 to get discs, but kept the 68 control arms. I also did the Caster mod, I wan't as aggressive as some but moved things forward a 1/2". The issue I appear to be having now is that I have positive camber on both sides and no shims in yet to increase caster. Caster is in the 1-2 range and needs to go up obviously. The alignment sheet showed about +0.3 camber give or take on both sides before any shims to increase caster. Now from searching these forums, this doesn't make a lot of sense. I get the sense that camber should be slightly negative without any shims. The caster mod would have no effect. The spindles wouldn't either. What came to mind tonight was the springs. I have the HD spring option in the front and rear, but I boobed and ordered standard spring for the front. The free height of what I have, GM 45H0011 is 13.18", installation height 10.00". The HD (45H0041) springs free height is 12.56" and installation height is 10.00". Could this 0.62" make the difference? I know from reading that short springs give you too much positive camber, too tall would do the opposite right?

Thanks in advance.
You're on the right track. A shorter spring would/should yield neg camber ~ zero. A taller spring would/should yield zero ~ pos camber.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote