View Single Post
Old 04-27-2017, 02:39 PM   #6
HO455
Post Whore
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 10,886
Re: more brake line issues

Personally I would be shipping them back. I see no good reason let a vendor off the hook for something as simple as brake line fitting sizes. The only way vendors stop selling products that don't work is if we stop letting them. OK. I'm getting off my soap box now.

On your rear hose what style of Tee do you have? My understanding is that the 71-72's have a different style than the earlier ones. First photo is of a later style hose which uses 1/4" fittings at the axle Tee. The second photo is of the hose mounting plate on the later axle. (It also shows my PO's use of an early hose with a late axle) The earlier hose Tee has 3/16" fittings and no bolt hole. This information comes from me replacing the lines on my 67 Burban. The PO had swapped a five lug axle under it. (3rd photo shows correct hose installed). Both hoses have 1/4" fittings on the frame side.

I don't know about what the front hoses on a 70 might look like, but my 67 had 3/16" fittings on the lines with an adapter to 1/4" for the hose. I don't know if it was this way from the factory but it had definitely been that way for a long time when I took it apart to replace the lines. (4th photo). The PO had swapped the front to a five lug disc set up. hope this helps with your issue.

I also know the coil spring hoses are longer than leaf spring hoses.
Attached Images
    
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377

Last edited by HO455; 04-27-2017 at 02:42 PM. Reason: -4 spelling
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote