View Single Post
Old 04-07-2020, 10:09 AM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,932
Re: the ls engine debackle

Quote:
Originally Posted by truckster View Post
I'm not knocking the LS, but that's simply not true of the Vortec engines. They're easily good for over 200k.
x2.....

An engine is an air-pump... It's as simple as that. Similar sized engines of different families perform different because of deficiencies/effeciencies in the parts used. A smog era SBC 327 using period parts & a carb is never going to match up against an LS based 5.3 with it's better compression ratio, better flowing heads, better spark control, EFI, & OD transmission.

But, that theoretical SBC 327 w/some better flowing heads, ideal compression, & an aftermarket EFI set-up w/an OD trans is on a much closer comparison level. The LS might seal better but they still can leak & they do.... Lots of mechanical stuff does.

Both engine families are good. Heck, both are great.
It's easy enough to put updated parts into a SBC (or even a BBC). Saying you can't get 2XX,XXX miles out of a sbc but can from an LS is not exactly accurate especially if they're built similarly.

Don't hate one over the other. Love them all
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline