|
Re: CPP front Coilover Kit
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI
While I agree w/the post in general, this is incorrect.
The CPP tubular arms do offer geometry improvements; it's just not in how the arms are 'built'. Their geometry improvement appears to be obtained the same way you would get it from stock lower control arms.... By shifting it forward.
When I looked @ their install info, I could see the distance variation (fore/aft) of the control arm shaft vs the x-member in images. So there is a benefit of additional Caster but it's nothing one couldn't get w/their stock arms as well.
|
That is the explanation I was given the signal time I got someone on the phone with CPP. The lower Coilover mount is the issue for me. I could rework that to allow longer shock travel. Then I figure run into the same issue the QA1 truck above was having. The lower shock mount is an issue when it comes to ground clearance. This boils down to give and take and the purpose of the truck in general though.
__________________
1984 K5 Blazer 4x4. Because my daily driver needs to be a project too... 
1971 C10. Auto Cross/Pro Touring Build. Project : I am gonna go broke with this one.
1970 Chevy LWB 4x4. 355, 4spd, Dana 44 front, Dana 60 rear, 35x12.50 tires... STOLEN
I will put a Turbo on anything with an engine if the $$$ is right. Once upon a time....
|