View Single Post
Old 09-29-2020, 11:08 AM   #46
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: #corona10truck - 77 C-10, pancaked crossmember - z'd frame etc etc etc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Elco View Post
I just bought a 78 SWB, and I'm toying with the idea of something similar in the front. What does the clearance look like at the core support with the Z? Specifically the support/radiator/efan/frame/steering box interface. This truck will be static, and I'm wondering, how much is too much? Half ton springs with a coil cut, 2 1/2 drop spindles, a pancake and a z, I wonder what that adds up to in the real world? Because at some point, the really low bagged guys are using the bags to get the frame off the ground, not so much "suspend" the truck, if you get my drift. I guess the question is, how much is too much, with a static drop. I dig your work. I'm considering the 49-52 tank for my behind the axle tank.

It takes 4" to get over large speed-bumps, turn-lane dividers (City Tiddys), & most concrete curbs. Most high-end rod-shops use that 4" marker as a max for static clearance under the vehicle for trouble-free driving.

My dually has 4-5" @ the rails/front x-member & I only worry about high-centering which happens a lot more when it's a 20' chassis (CC LWB).

Measure where you are now & use that 4" number as a benchmark for reference.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote