View Single Post
Old 01-03-2019, 10:43 AM   #18
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,863
Re: 67 68 hood angle

I figure the grille is big enough as is. I think more intake, especially up there, would look excessive and detract from the appearance. I swear I have seen it done but don't know where. Maybe a competition vehicle, but it didn't make it look better.

They may have gone to the blunt, more truck-like (we know it was that), nose to accommodate the rapidly growing personal use 4wd and RV market. I mean '69 was first year for K/5, '70 4wd was available for the first time across the line-up, Suburbans had become much more comfortable & bigger, and campers were a huge market. Things had expanded well beyond the C/10 pickup.

I like them all in any form. But if I could only have a 4wd and a 2wd it's 4wd 69-72 and 2wd 67/68. I want the blunt on a tall 4wd (that should have a winch bumper on front) and sleek on a short 2wd. More utility on one and more style on the other, in it's general outline.
Name:  cf30b0e93dbe65422ea977441d494cd8.jpg
Views: 258
Size:  52.6 KB
Name:  e685c8ce1b87a1e2143d2b747e420d4a.jpg
Views: 661
Size:  88.9 KB

I'd really like to have an example of all. A 67/68 K-model is not wimpy looking and a 69-72 is no ugly duck
Name:  In blue.jpg
Views: 222
Size:  42.9 KB
Name:  Uncles.jpg
Views: 237
Size:  69.8 KB
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~

Last edited by special-K; 01-03-2019 at 10:54 AM.
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote