The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2003, 06:26 PM   #1
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
canister vs. screw on oil filter

here's another stupid question guys and gals...went to Napa today to grab an oil filter, my truck has a 350 with the canister type oil filter. the guy looked up '69 GMC in the filters manual, and it gave the PN for a screw on oil filter. I just had him get the PN for a '68 GMC, since it was the canister type. My question is this, when exactly did they stop using the canister type oil filter? Last time I went to the same Napa, the store owner looked up '69 GMC, and went and grabbed a canister filter off the shelf. One of the parts store regulars (those old guys that are always standing around in there) said that my engine "had to be from a '63 or earlier car or truck" because that is when they stopped using canisters, but I think he's wrong. Maybe I should just check Mortec, to see if I really do have a 350 and not something else, that would be indicated by the canister oil filter. Phew, sorry for the length, any info would be appreciated.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 07:32 PM   #2
toms68cst
Registered User
 
toms68cst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 4,277
My 68 Chevy 327 was a cannister type. (I Want to go back to cannister someday) I don't remember where I heard this but I think that many chevy cars went to spin-on around 68. The trucks stayed with cannister until around 69-70? That's my understanding though it's not based on hard facts.

Perhaps you could make the assumption that MOST small journal small blocks were cannister type and MOST large journal small blocks were spin-on. The exception would be trucks which carried through a couple of years later with the cannister.
__________________
Unrestored 68 C-10 CST. Original 327. 4-Speed CH465. 50k or so miles.

TREASURER, Drum Brake Club.
toms68cst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 08:00 PM   #3
junkyardjohn
Registered User
 
junkyardjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SOMERSET KY.
Posts: 6,427


I'VE HAD EVERY YEAR (67-72) & EVERY ONE HAS HAD A SPIN-ON OIL FILTER, BUT SINCE I DIDN'T BUY ANY OF THEM NEW, I CAN'T SWEAR THEY CAME FROM G.M. THAT WAY.
__________________
junkyardjohn
69 1 TON TOW TRUCK //
84 4WD CUCV BLAZER// 85 1 TON 4WD STAKE TRUCK// 86 M1031 5/4 TON 4WD CUCV// ALOT OF OLD TRUCKS FOR ONE OLD MAN TO DRIVE. THERES ROOM FOR ALL OF GODS CREATURES RIGHT NEXT TO MY MASHED POTATOES//
LIFE MEMBER OF P.E.T.A (PEOPLE EATING TASTY ANIMALS)

DON'T RENT U-HAUL

ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH
IT WILL AMAZE PART OF THE PEOPLE & ASTONISH THE REST
junkyardjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 08:15 PM   #4
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
the 67chevy overhaul manual shows a spin-on type filter
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 09:24 PM   #5
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
Quote:
Originally posted by junkyardjohn


I'VE HAD EVERY YEAR (67-72) & EVERY ONE HAS HAD A SPIN-ON OIL FILTER, BUT SINCE I DIDN'T BUY ANY OF THEM NEW, I CAN'T SWEAR THEY CAME FROM G.M. THAT WAY.
Hmm...I did forget about that kit you could buy to convert any canister type to a spin on. I don't really mind my canister, and it works a little better from what I've heard.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 10:57 PM   #6
BtnkBndt
Pennyless Fool
 
BtnkBndt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Forney,Tx
Posts: 439
My 67 was canister, just converted it to spin-on.
BtnkBndt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2003, 11:04 PM   #7
Josh
He's got mean nasty FANGS!
 
Josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 6,508
From everythign I've seen, almost all V8 trucks from 67-69 had teh cannister type. The striaght sixes had spin ons, some mid to late 69 V8s may have had spin ons also.
__________________
2004 K2500 Burb
1999 C3500
1985 Cutlass Supreme
1969 C-10
1967 C-10 Panel
josh@67-72chevytrucks.com
Josh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2003, 03:00 AM   #8
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
Quote:
some mid to late 69 V8s may have had spin ons also.
thats what I was thinking, Josh. I know my GMC was an early production model, perhaps made in '68, because of the Rockwell t-case. Hmm.

thanks for the responses guys, keep em comin
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2003, 05:06 AM   #9
69oldie
Never too many LONGHORNS!
 
69oldie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Los Angeles Calififornia
Posts: 423
I had a 1969 Chevy truck that had a 396 engine with a cannister type and another 1969 Chevy truck that had a 307 engine with a cannister type.
Hope this helps
69oldie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 03:24 AM   #10
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
T T T
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 03:30 AM   #11
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
One of my friends had a '67 C10 with an original 283....and a cannister oil filter.

I would run your numbers 1969 GMC....at least get the suffix code (2-3 letter code on a machined pad on the block infront of the passenger side cylinder head), and run them at www.nastyz28.com . Mortec.com dosent' have the suffix codes anywhere that i could find on their website.
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:36 PM   #12
palallin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. James, MO
Posts: 1,239
Quote:
Originally posted by 1969 GMC
I know my GMC was an early production model, perhaps made in '68, because of the Rockwell t-case.
My '69 is late production and has the Rockwell. . . . .
__________________
'69 Longstep K-10: 327/SM465/T-221/Closed Knuckle Dana44/12-bolt.
palallin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 06:37 PM   #13
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
Lucas...where exactly is this pad? Can I see it with the engine in the truck and the manifolds on? I looked but couldn't find anything.

Palallin-i guess it just depended on what the assembly plants had sitting on the shelf. In '69 they were supposed to switch to the 205 but not all did.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 07:00 PM   #14
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
Here ya go Adam....i circled the pad in yellow. It is proably covered with grease....wipe it off and the letters are usually the last charcters stamped on the pad.
Attached Images
 
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 08:36 PM   #15
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
thanks man...i came up with a TJM, which translated to a 73-74 350 from a bus? odd that it would have a canister still.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 08:16 AM   #16
Ronster66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Columbia City, Indiana
Posts: 30
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

So what is the consensus opinion on doing the conversion from canister/cartridge filter to spin-on filter? I converted my 327 (‘66 C10) to spin-on many years ago and I now wonder if I did the right thing. Other than nostalgia or “concours restoration” are there any arguments for keeping or, in my case, returning to the original canister/cartridge style oil filter? Any arguments for the spin-on filter being the better choice?
__________________
'66 Custom Cab BBW SWB Fleetside 327/TH350 Factory A/C
‘96 Dodge Ram 2500 Laramie SLT Club Cab 4X4 8’ bed V10/47RE
Ronster66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 08:31 AM   #17
Ronster66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Columbia City, Indiana
Posts: 30
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

So what is the consensus opinion on doing the conversion from canister/cartridge filter to spin-on filter? I converted my 327 (‘66 C10) to spin-on many years ago and I now wonder if I did the right thing. Other than nostalgia or “concours restoration” are there any arguments for keeping or, in my case, returning to the original canister/cartridge style oil filter? Any arguments for the spin-on filter being the better choice?
__________________
'66 Custom Cab BBW SWB Fleetside 327/TH350 Factory A/C
‘96 Dodge Ram 2500 Laramie SLT Club Cab 4X4 8’ bed V10/47RE
Ronster66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 08:36 AM   #18
Andy4639
Old member
 
Andy4639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Liberty, & Garden City S.C. , U.S.
Posts: 19,936
Thumbs up Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

All my trucks have spin on's. The 71 had it from factory. The 68 I just sold I swapped it to a spin on. I prefer it over the mess canister make.

The ramp truck has a spin on but it's not the motor that came in it. It's a Corvrtte motor 350 per the old owner!

Which by the way could be it had the corvette ram-horns on it when I got it. They are now on the 64 SS Impala though.

To answer your question I like the spin on filters much easier to do a change than the canister and not near as messy!
__________________
1971 LWB Custom, 6.0LS & 4L80E, Speedhut.com GPS speedometer & gauges with A/C. 20" Boss 338's Grey wheels 4 wheel disc brakes. My Driver
Seeing the USA in a 71


Upstate SC GM Truck Club
2013,14 and 2016 Hot Rod Pour Tour


http://upstategmtrucks.com/



Get out and drive the truck this summer and have some fun!
It sucks not being able to hear!

LWB trucks rule, if you don't think so measure your SWB!
After talking to tech support at Air Lift I have found out that the kit I need is 60811. Per the measurements I gave them. Ride height of truck inside spring and inside diameter of springs.
Andy4639 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 08:51 AM   #19
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,153
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

I've changed 1000+ oil filters in my years as a mechanic. Picking that o-ring out of the block on the canister type filters is a time-consuming pain in the neck. I prefer the spin-on.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 09:03 AM   #20
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,436
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

My 67 has been converted to spin on (283). Funny thing is three of the four toyota's I have are canister type. Go figure.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2020 Toyota CH-R
2020 Acura MDX
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 09:59 AM   #21
Ronster66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Columbia City, Indiana
Posts: 30
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67C10Step View Post
My 67 has been converted to spin on (283). Funny thing is three of the four toyota's I have are canister type. Go figure.
LOL! I have a 2017 Chrysler Pacifica and two 2016 Chrysler 200Â’s that have cartridge filters too. The difference is, theyÂ’re accessed from the top of the engine. They drain out when the drain plug is pulled. My dadÂ’s 2016 Chevy Equinox is the same way. Makes for a very nice, mess free oil and filter change. Quite a different set up than the SBC cartridge.

Steeveedee, your account/experience has thoroughly convinced me I did the right thing.

Thanks to all of you for your responses.
__________________
'66 Custom Cab BBW SWB Fleetside 327/TH350 Factory A/C
‘96 Dodge Ram 2500 Laramie SLT Club Cab 4X4 8’ bed V10/47RE
Ronster66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 10:35 AM   #22
chewychevy67
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 5,426
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

I wanted to keep my canister so I did this little modification. I can drain the canister in about 10 minutes before I remove it.
Attached Images
   
chewychevy67 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 12:02 PM   #23
Ronster66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Columbia City, Indiana
Posts: 30
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

Quote:
Originally Posted by chewychevy67 View Post
I wanted to keep my canister so I did this little modification. I can drain the canister in about 10 minutes before I remove it.
That is a great idea and some good work. If I hadn’t already converted mine, I would definitely be giving that a shot.
__________________
'66 Custom Cab BBW SWB Fleetside 327/TH350 Factory A/C
‘96 Dodge Ram 2500 Laramie SLT Club Cab 4X4 8’ bed V10/47RE
Ronster66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 09:59 PM   #24
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,937
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

Quote:
Originally Posted by chewychevy67 View Post
I wanted to keep my canister so I did this little modification. I can drain the canister in about 10 minutes before I remove it.
Smarty pants. Ha, that's a great idea. I've had one too many oil baths in my life.
jocko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2020, 06:48 AM   #25
toms68cst
Registered User
 
toms68cst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 4,277
Re: canister vs. screw on oil filter

Or you could go with this. (Might be a bit tough in this day and age!)
Attached Images
 
__________________
Unrestored 68 C-10 CST. Original 327. 4-Speed CH465. 50k or so miles.

TREASURER, Drum Brake Club.
toms68cst is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com