The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2012, 04:13 PM   #1
mylow53
Registered User
 
mylow53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: thousand oaks, California
Posts: 732
1971 question

My dad wants me to buy this 1971 chevy pu with a 305 and a 3 speed auto poise rear, new dash, in primer. the owner says it has 71 k original miles (says speedo still works) and was brought up from california a couple of years ago. I haven't seen a picture yet so it's hard to say it's worth the 3600 he wants for it. the question is are there any issues i need to look for. common rust areas, the 305 is a ..... motor... any advise will be helpful. not planning on restoring it like the 53 i have,i just want to drive it!
if it all checks out thinking on offering $2500
i figure it's exempt from calif smog right?!
Thanks Guys!
GT
__________________
Greg
1953 chevy 1/2 ton 5 window, chevy 350 330 horse 700r tranz, lowering spindels mustang 2 frount. ford 9", airbags on 4 corners . purchased in 1983 for $325 while in high school
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=215079&page=5
mylow53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 04:35 PM   #2
69GWC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,089
Re: 1971 question

Cab corners, rockers, floor boards, cab mounts, under the cal and check the roof. Mostly just rockers and cab corners.
Posted via Mobile Device
69GWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 04:38 PM   #3
Resto-Rand
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 108
Re: 1971 question

Yep. Smog exempt. I just found rust at the top of the windshield (inside) on mine.
Resto-Rand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 05:06 PM   #4
mdeprimo271
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lake Ariel PA
Posts: 5
Re: 1971 question

The 305 isn't a bad motor. It all depends on how much $$$ you want to throw at it. If you put a set of Edelbrock heads, a decent cam and an Edelbrock carb and intake. You can get about 400hp from a 305. An old timer once told me, "the bottom end isn't where the horsepower is, it's in the top end. You just need to know how to wake the motor up." The downside is you'll spend about $1500-$2000 in the process.
mdeprimo271 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 05:45 PM   #5
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 19,992
Re: 1971 question

Is it a LWB or a SWB truck?
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 05:56 PM   #6
cerjio
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: coffeyville, Kansas
Posts: 195
Re: 1971 question

Quote:
Originally Posted by leddzepp View Post
Is it a LWB or a SWB truck?
Is it a 305 or a 307 ? there is a diffrence an the 307 would have been the common motor for those years , along with looking at body areas mentione above , look at the wiring , under the hood , the dash an Rear around the lights most splicing will be done there.
cerjio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 06:08 PM   #7
AirSpeed
Registered User
 
AirSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fall River California
Posts: 2,026
Re: 1971 question

Also check the cab mounts, they rust as well. The first thing I do when I buy one of these trucks is take a hose to the inside can corners, clear the drains in the doors, the drains in the cab mounts and shove a hose down the vents under the cowl. You will be amazed how much crap builds up in those areas. Gets some pics from the guy!
Posted via Mobile Device
AirSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 06:54 PM   #8
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,921
Re: 1971 question

305's weren't even thunk of yet when these trucks were sold. So it's not the original 71K engine that it's claimed to have. The 305 would actually bring the value of the rig down if you ask me.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 07:39 PM   #9
mylow53
Registered User
 
mylow53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: thousand oaks, California
Posts: 732
Re: 1971 question

interesting comments guys as soon as i have picts ill post them. he said it was an 8 foot bed. probably a dumb question but i heard a 327 can have bad gas milage but a 350 can get better milage. what about this 305 / 307? my 53 (with a 350) is getting around 15 if i'm good. every one tells me to expect 9 mpg...
thanks for the help!
GT
__________________
Greg
1953 chevy 1/2 ton 5 window, chevy 350 330 horse 700r tranz, lowering spindels mustang 2 frount. ford 9", airbags on 4 corners . purchased in 1983 for $325 while in high school
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=215079&page=5
mylow53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 07:51 PM   #10
72k10stepside
Registered User
 
72k10stepside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 12
Re: 1971 question

the roof rust is a very common problem they never treated the metal on the inside of the roof but it took 40 years for this to start to happening. Also check your cab supports and floor.
__________________
1972 K10 Stepside: SBC 350, TH350 Transmission, NP205, 4 inch lift, 33" tires.
Frame Off Restoration 2011- Spring 2014

1971 K10 Stepside: SBC 350, TH 350 Transmission 6 inch Lift Kit 35'' tires SOLD

1970 K10 Parts Truck: SBC 350 for 1972, SM 465 Transmission
72k10stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 08:02 PM   #11
Mustard72
Registered User
 
Mustard72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ladysmith, WI
Posts: 641
Re: 1971 question

Ought to be able to do a little than 9 mpg, especially if its a C10 with relatively highway friendly gears. I get 11-13 or so with my C20 with the 4.57 rear end on the highway (60 mph, rarely gets on any highways with higher speed limits around here).
Mustard72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 08:24 PM   #12
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,921
Re: 1971 question

The 305 and 307 are different animals. The 305 has a smaller bore and crappy cylinder heads. The 307 can be built to be a decent engine for a truck.


MPG's in these old trucks is never gonna be that great with the old school engines. They were never designed to get good gas mileage in the first place.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 08:43 PM   #13
davepl
Registered User
 
davepl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,332
Re: 1971 question

Isn't there a 305 V6 in that era? Everyone seems to be assuming its a small block chevy 305, but throwing it out there just in case...
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible
davepl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 10:35 PM   #14
WIDESIDE72
Senior Member
 
WIDESIDE72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,494
Re: 1971 question

Quote:
Originally Posted by davepl View Post
Isn't there a 305 V6 in that era? Everyone seems to be assuming its a small block chevy 305, but throwing it out there just in case...
No 305v6 in 72, and it would have been in a GMC only. I seriously doubt anyone would have gone to the trouble to swap one in. If it is in fact a 305 and the mileage you mentioned, I have to wonder why (?) I would look for signs that the odometer has rolled over. Pretty easy to tell 70k as opposed to 170k wiggle all of the door and window handles. Work all of the ventilation controls. Look at pedal pads. Drive trick and listen for rattles. A 70k mile truck should still be pretty tight.

The 307 has gotten a bad wrap. IMO and experience it is a good all around engine, better than a 305. Good power and mileage potential with sims hop up parts like any SBC, just don't go crazy with the cam lift/ duration.
Posted via Mobile Device
WIDESIDE72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 10:38 PM   #15
WIDESIDE72
Senior Member
 
WIDESIDE72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,494
Re: 1971 question

Be sire to check the gutter over doors and windshield. If the truck sat out a lot, the seam sealer cracks, letting water into the seam and into the cab. Since the cab is bare steel between the two layers, it rusts from onside out, just like outer rockers do.
Posted via Mobile Device
WIDESIDE72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 10:39 PM   #16
WIDESIDE72
Senior Member
 
WIDESIDE72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,494
Smile Re: 1971 question

Quote:
Originally Posted by AirSpeed View Post
Also check the cab mounts, they rust as well. The first thing I do when I buy one of these trucks is take a hose to the inside can corners, clear the drains in the doors, the drains in the cab mounts and shove a hose down the vents under the cowl. You will be amazed how much crap builds up in those areas. Gets some pics from the guy!
Posted via Mobile Device

X2
Posted via Mobile Device
WIDESIDE72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com