|
|
|
02-25-2019, 07:31 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,189
|
why the difference
found these two why did they make 2 and which came first.
|
|
|
|
02-25-2019, 08:32 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hancock Md
Posts: 389
|
Re: why the difference
From what I've been told the solid one was the 1st design and they went with the multi-piece one to help dampen vibrations through the shifter and give it a bit of a buffer from people being too forceful with shifts and munching gears.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2019, 09:27 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,189
|
Re: why the difference
Quote:
Last edited by pimpston65; 02-26-2019 at 10:14 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2019, 09:38 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 537
|
Re: why the difference
Great timing on this question, I was just wondering the same thing. Are both of these styles correct for the SM420? Anybody know if the change was made by date or application (C10 vs C30 or K vs C truck etc).
Any chance of a picture showing the entire sticks side by side? Thanks for info Tom
__________________
65 short stepside K10 292-SM420-T221 8 lug closed D44 front NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear |
|
|
|
|
02-25-2019, 09:50 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,189
|
Re: why the difference
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-27-2019, 01:55 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 537
|
Re: why the difference
Quote:
More pictures by you or anybody else would be great, Thanks
__________________
65 short stepside K10 292-SM420-T221 8 lug closed D44 front NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear |
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 06:44 AM
|
#7 |
|
Check The Champ, Demonstrator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal,Quebec
Posts: 6,625
|
Re: why the difference
Seems to be something going on for 1965.
__________________
1963 Chevrolet Truck Literature LINK: https://picasaweb.google.com/113840717762774560215 YouTube Channel with 20+ Original Chevrolet Truck Salesmen, Mechanics & Service Department Training Slideshows. https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...otruk63&page=1 |
|
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 06:54 AM
|
#8 |
|
Check The Champ, Demonstrator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal,Quebec
Posts: 6,625
|
Re: why the difference
Took a picture course it doesn't load. Parts Book states first jobs 1 piece construction less sleeve. After jobs welded construction with sleeve.
part number 3665527 60-62. 3822568 63-64 Same part number as 63-64 for first jobs 65 3860941 65 After Jobs There are illustrations for a 60-62 4spd transmission and also 63-66. So there must be a difference as well between the two.
__________________
1963 Chevrolet Truck Literature LINK: https://picasaweb.google.com/113840717762774560215 YouTube Channel with 20+ Original Chevrolet Truck Salesmen, Mechanics & Service Department Training Slideshows. https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...otruk63&page=1 |
|
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 11:23 AM
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,163
|
Re: why the difference
There is actually another later version during the square body era.
The sleeve version shown here has a square feature that fits in the base with rubber molded between the two. A later version is round internally and has 2 “O” rings to provide the isolation. K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly 1979-1986 GM Full Size Truck Engineering 1986 - 2019 Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
