The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-2020, 01:16 PM   #1
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,931
Re: trailing arms: Goodmark vs. ECE vs. OEM

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69Tom View Post
Question: are 3/4 ton and 1/2 ton 115" wb arms the same length?
Yes. The 3/4 ton arms have plating on top & bottom for gusseting.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 01:51 PM   #2
biketopia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Warrenton VA
Posts: 1,011
Re: trailing arms: Goodmark vs. ECE vs. OEM

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Yes. The 3/4 ton arms have plating on top & bottom for gusseting.
To prevent flex??
__________________
71 c-10 Long Bed, under the knife for a No Limit Engineering Wide Ride Chassis Pack and coil over static drop.

07 Silverado Classic 2wd

95 Camaro 427SBC/TH350
biketopia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 02:26 PM   #3
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,931
Re: trailing arms: Goodmark vs. ECE vs. OEM

Quote:
Originally Posted by biketopia View Post
To prevent flex??
More for increasing the structural strength is my bet. Since the arms were originally 2 pieces of C-channel butted together & spot welded, they could in theory (reality) come apart. I had one split on my high-school ride in the 80's.... Scared the crap out of me when it happened.

Imagine if it happened under severe duty apps (heavy towing/loads)? The plates added that additional strength/security. The entire arm was not plated, just the top/bottom F/R sections close to the bushings/U-bolts where the flex/twist would be minimal since that's where they're bolted solid to the mounts/rear end.

If I'm upgrading OE arms, I clean between the seams as much as possible w/a wire brush & use air/water pressure to get the funk out. Then I'll do some short 1-1.5" length stitch welds in the horizontal seams about every 6-8 inches of the length. I also weld the vertical seam @ both the front & rear of the arm. Less weight vs. plating & stronger than OE.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com