The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 99-06 GMT800 Chevy and GMC Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2014, 06:53 PM   #1
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
03 Tahoe

I have an 03 Z71 Tahoe 5.3L flex fuel and I am trying to find the intake manifold vacuum spec. My current map sensor reading at hot idle in park is 10.0 in/hg. I have tried google and it keeps giving me fuel pressure specs. I even contacted two local dealers,twice, and they have never returned my calls. Even went to one of them and I was told to bring my vehicle in and they would look at it. I just want to confirm what the reading is suppose to be so I know where best to go next on my diag. I have found no vacuum leaks, no ses light, just a driveability issue that has been confusing to figure out. The vacuum reading was the only reading that seemed wrong.
__________________
Thank a Veteran. They have sacrificed more than you will ever know!
2003 Chevy Z71 Tahoe 190,500 miles
2002 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 230,000 miles
1987 custom built Silverado 4x4 435,764 miles
1985 K5 Blazer 396 bb 4x4 project
1982 K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4 519,348 miles
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 09:47 PM   #2
clinebarger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,370
Re: 03 Tahoe

Your readings fall within specs, Hard specs are hard to find because it depends on Altitude.

5 Hg to 14 Hg is a "loose" spec at idle.

Your also reading the Data wrong, Those are Barometric Pressure readings, Not Vacuum gauge readings. 10 Hg of BARO pressure is roughly equal to 18 Hg of manifold vacuum.
clinebarger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 11:51 PM   #3
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 03 Tahoe

Possibly, i was just going by what the scanner data reader said...Map: 10.0 in/hg. There is another reading labled Baro but i dont remember what it said the data was on that one. I am used to the older motors where the map sensor only read vacuum and that reading of 10 was way to low to me based off all my other motors readings if that reading was vacuum and nothing else. I couldnt get anywhere with my local gm dealer, they just kept blowing me off. thanks.
__________________
Thank a Veteran. They have sacrificed more than you will ever know!
2003 Chevy Z71 Tahoe 190,500 miles
2002 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 230,000 miles
1987 custom built Silverado 4x4 435,764 miles
1985 K5 Blazer 396 bb 4x4 project
1982 K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4 519,348 miles
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 07:27 PM   #4
clinebarger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,370
Re: 03 Tahoe

What issue's are you having?
clinebarger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2014, 09:47 AM   #5
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 03 Tahoe

I had intermittent no to very low power output, bad miss and intermittent stumble at idle yet wouldnt always throw a code, my mileage has dropped over the last 2 years slowly from 18-19 down to 10-11. Ive changed plugs, wires, converters, exhaust manifolds, intake gaskets, a rusted out muffler, fuel pump, fuel pressure regulator, swapped back an forth between the stock air box and a k&n cold airkit, changed MAF sensor. I finally just recently was able to get ahold of a live data scanner, saw my fuel trims were off slightly and that map reading. I changed the MAF sensor again under warranty thinkin it might be bad, and I found the MAP sensor loose in the manifold with a torn seal. Though I couldnt verify a leak there, I changed the MAP sensor anyway cause of the torn seal. The scanner showed a constant miss on cylinder 8 but wouldnt throw a code. I pulled the plug and it wasnt sealing on the head all the way around so I changed it and swapped the wire to another cylinder. These three things have helped power and the miss but mileage is still down, so far. The miss is still there but nowhere near as bad. I need to get the scanner again and see if it moved cylinders after swappin the wire around.
__________________
Thank a Veteran. They have sacrificed more than you will ever know!
2003 Chevy Z71 Tahoe 190,500 miles
2002 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 230,000 miles
1987 custom built Silverado 4x4 435,764 miles
1985 K5 Blazer 396 bb 4x4 project
1982 K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4 519,348 miles
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2014, 10:23 PM   #6
clinebarger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,370
Re: 03 Tahoe

Keep us updated.
clinebarger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 03:57 PM   #7
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 03 Tahoe

Update: I also swapped the coil to a different cyl. I was finally able to get the scanner again today and the following is what I found. Map: hot idle in park 10.6, hot idle in D 12.4 in/hg, Baro: 28.3, Ign voltage 13.3 volts. The miss did not change cylinders, it still misses on number 8. The higher the rpm the less it misses though so I am going to swap the Injector out with a brand new one I got for free and see if that helps. I am still curious about the map sensor reading. I guess I will just need to hook the scanner up to the 02 Silverado and see what it shows for a comparison. I have power again though it is still a pig below 3000 rpm and mileage has come back up but not much, from 10-11 to right at 14 so far.
__________________
Thank a Veteran. They have sacrificed more than you will ever know!
2003 Chevy Z71 Tahoe 190,500 miles
2002 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 230,000 miles
1987 custom built Silverado 4x4 435,764 miles
1985 K5 Blazer 396 bb 4x4 project
1982 K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4 519,348 miles
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 08:11 PM   #8
buddy_1
Registered User
 
buddy_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Humble, Texas
Posts: 185
Re: 03 Tahoe

What kind of scanner are you using?
__________________
I know the "VOICES" aren't real but they have some great ideas.
1978 GMC Sierra Classic C25
1983 Datsun 280ZX Turbo
1997 Chevy Cheyenne K2500
1999 Polaris Sport 400
buddy_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 08:20 PM   #9
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 03 Tahoe

I believe it is a Snap On scanner. Im not 100% on that. It belongs to a tech at my dealership.
__________________
Thank a Veteran. They have sacrificed more than you will ever know!
2003 Chevy Z71 Tahoe 190,500 miles
2002 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 230,000 miles
1987 custom built Silverado 4x4 435,764 miles
1985 K5 Blazer 396 bb 4x4 project
1982 K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4 519,348 miles
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 09:29 PM   #10
buddy_1
Registered User
 
buddy_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Humble, Texas
Posts: 185
Re: 03 Tahoe

To start with, turn the key on with engine off and see what the MAP reads. Then compare that to an Altitude vs Barometric pressure chart. See this

Altitude Versus Barometric Pressure

Determine your altitude by contacting a local weather station or by using another reference source.

Altitude Measured in Meters (m)
Altitude Measured in Feet (ft)
Barometric Pressure Measured in Kilopascals (kPa)
Barometric Pressure Measured in Pounds Per Square Inch (PSI)


4,267
14,000
56–64
8.1–9.3

3,962
13,000
58–66
8.4–9.6

3,658
12,000
61–69
8.8–10.0

3,353
11,000
64–72
9.3–10.4

3,048
10,000
66–74
9.6–10.7

2,743
9,000
69–77
10.0–11.2

2,438
8,000
71–79
10.3–11.5

2,134
7,000
74–82
10.7–11.9

1,829
6,000
77–85
11.2–12.3

1,524
5,000
80–88
11.6–12.8

1,219
4,000
83–91
12.0–13.2

914
3,000
87–95
12.6–13.8

610
2,000
90–98
13.1–14.2

305
1,000
94–102
13.6–14.8

0
0 Sea Level
96–104
13.9–15.1

−305
−1,000
101–105
14.6–15.2

Sorry about how the chart displays when I copy and paste out of the manual.
__________________
I know the "VOICES" aren't real but they have some great ideas.
1978 GMC Sierra Classic C25
1983 Datsun 280ZX Turbo
1997 Chevy Cheyenne K2500
1999 Polaris Sport 400
buddy_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 10:17 PM   #11
clinebarger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,370
Re: 03 Tahoe

Quote:
Originally Posted by biggsteve97 View Post
Update: I also swapped the coil to a different cyl. I was finally able to get the scanner again today and the following is what I found. Map: hot idle in park 10.6, hot idle in D 12.4 in/hg, Baro: 28.3, Ign voltage 13.3 volts. The miss did not change cylinders, it still misses on number 8. The higher the rpm the less it misses though so I am going to swap the Injector out with a brand new one I got for free and see if that helps. I am still curious about the map sensor reading. I guess I will just need to hook the scanner up to the 02 Silverado and see what it shows for a comparison. I have power again though it is still a pig below 3000 rpm and mileage has come back up but not much, from 10-11 to right at 14 so far.
I didn't do a very good job of explaining the MAP readings.

MAP sensors read on a Hg Pressure Scale not a PSI/Vacuum scale, That's why they are called Manifold Absolute Pressure Sensors.

Your BARO reading is the Pressure reading inside the intake Before starting the engine....This gives the ECM an idea of the Altitude that the engine is operating in. 28.3 hg would put you at around 1500 ft above sea level.
clinebarger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 03:52 PM   #12
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 03 Tahoe

Update: I tried the to use the new free injector I have but it was different despite have the same connector. It was shorter than my injectors so the oring looked like it didn't quite go into the intake far enough to make a good enough seal so I didn't chance it. So I just swapped the injector to a different cylinder. Power is back up almost to where it should be and the miss at idle is intermittent now. I finally got to use the scanner today and I still have a cylinder 8 misfire so the injector was good after all. I am going to do a compression test this weekend. Odd thing though around 900 rpm the miss almost completely goes away according to the scanner. anything above or below that and it comes back. at 1300-1500 it misses just like at idle according to the scanner but cant feel it driving down the road. still no light. I am suspecting a burnt valve now only due to last year the spark plug backed halfway out of cylinder 8 and started causing a neck jerking miss while cruising. When I figured that out i installed new plugs just to make sure all were good. Fuel mileage has even come up into the mid-high 14's so its better a tolerable at least. A guy at my shop offered me a set of 6.0L heads if it turns out my head is bad or needs work. So maybe Ill be able to use to 6.0 hot cam Ive had for a few years afterall.
__________________
Thank a Veteran. They have sacrificed more than you will ever know!
2003 Chevy Z71 Tahoe 190,500 miles
2002 Chevy Silverado 1500 4x4 230,000 miles
1987 custom built Silverado 4x4 435,764 miles
1985 K5 Blazer 396 bb 4x4 project
1982 K5 Blazer Silverado 4x4 519,348 miles
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com