The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2009, 12:13 PM   #1
jgh64pkup
Sunburst C10!!!
 
jgh64pkup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,560
Re: stroking a 350

is a big block more efficient to build such as power an tq
__________________
Gage
1967 C10 Shortbed Stepside
jgh64pkup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 02:08 PM   #2
Marv D
Registered Truck Offender
 
Marv D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
Re: stroking a 350

Make a plan, set a budget and move forward in ONE direction. Building something 'pretty radical' and 'supercharger later on' doesn't even belong in the same thought! A blower motor is going to be built with around 8.0 to 8.5:1 compression. It's the only way to keep it alive once boost comes up. A heavy hitter small block capable of putting one of these bricks in the 11's n/a is NOT going to happen with 8.1 You will be running a completely different combination of piston, cam, intake, valve spring, echaust, convertor, and gear between a n/a motor and a blown motor. So I again say... pick a HP target, pick a budget (and double it ) and THEN you can make some serious decisions.
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age!

When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead.
.....It's kinda the same when your STUPID.


I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral.

Last edited by Marv D; 05-14-2009 at 02:09 PM.
Marv D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 03:15 PM   #3
jgh64pkup
Sunburst C10!!!
 
jgh64pkup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,560
Re: stroking a 350

what about a 10 to 1 383 with a 150 shot of nitrous
__________________
Gage
1967 C10 Shortbed Stepside
jgh64pkup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 09:07 AM   #4
ProStreet71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Huntingdon,TN
Posts: 95
Re: stroking a 350

I was playing around with the horsepower calculator on TCI's website and found this..... Assuming your vehicle weighs 4000 pounds you would theoretically run 11.56 with 500 HP. I do not know how accurate this is but it might give you some kind of idea on what kind of HP goal you want to set. You first need to set a realistic budget because this is most peoples limiting factor. 500 HP is not easy to get on a tight budget. Nitrous is the least expensive way to go, but you need to make sure you have a good foundation that will handle the nitrous. Like Marv said, Pick a plan and a budget and follow it. After you've done that, most of these guys on here would be glad to help you.
ProStreet71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 05:26 AM   #5
z400rider8787
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Yelm, WA
Posts: 62
Re: stroking a 350

I am doing pretty much the same as you but i've already done all the research. 11 seconds is fast, REALLY FAST. almost too fast for the street. If you want something that is streetable and still hauls ass the 500HP mark is about the max. I've got a 4 bolt 350 block that im gonna build as follows....
355 CID
forged crank
h-beam rods
9.75:1-10:1 compression
forged pistons
pro comp aluminum 210cc heads
2.02 1.60 valves
.600 lift springs
Roller rockers
edelbrock RPM intake
750 holley
and either:
lunati voodoo hyd. cam 233/241 dur .504/.525 lift or:
comp thumpr hyd roller 243/257dur .533/.519 lift
150 shot nitrous

the lunati will give me 460 hp and the comp will give me 530 hp according to my dyno program, which is pretty accurate. the only toss up is between the roller cam or flat tappet. i obviously get more power with the roller but it costs about 3 times as much. the 530 HP roller motor should put me into the 12's on the motor and maybe high 11's if i can get it to hook up and lighten in a little. if you built a 383 with the exact same setup you probably get high 11's easily with nitrous assuming your tranny is built right and you can get traction, and still remain fairly streetable. hope this helps
z400rider8787 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 10:55 AM   #6
jgh64pkup
Sunburst C10!!!
 
jgh64pkup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,560
Re: stroking a 350

thanks im still not sure what im going to do
i guess ill just have to make up my mind
__________________
Gage
1967 C10 Shortbed Stepside
jgh64pkup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2009, 08:10 PM   #7
Irishpilot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kunsan AB, South Korea
Posts: 187
Re: stroking a 350

I agree with the 383 stroker using a 350 block. If you use other blocks like the 400, you can go with bigger cubes and the same reliability. However, the best bang for your buck is going to be a 383.

As far as forged versus cast cranks & pistons, if you can afford forged then go for bad, slap on FI (forced induction) and run with 800+ hp. For the rest of us who don't have unlimited funds, cast cranks are great and will take abuse on the occasional 1/4 pass. However, if you plan on running boost later, then forged will keep you safe.

If you want to run 87 octane, then 9.5 on aluminum heads is max. I run 10.6 compression on my aluminum heads, but I run premium. No pinging and it has mild street manners. Take a point of cc off for using iron heads.

450-480hp on a 383 with aluminum heads is what you can expect.

460-500 hp on a 400 with alum heads.

Realize that stroker motors make their money on off-the-line torque...that's what our trucks need!
__________________
1971 C-10, 406ci, restoration begun!
406ci sb; zero decked, bored .030, edelbrock aluminum e-tec heads, edelbrock performer RPM intake, comp 268 cam, comp 1.6 pro-magnum roller rockers, MSD street fire HEI, MSD 8.5mm wires, Holley Street demon 770, Hedman LT headers. 10.6:1 compression, Air Ride Tech bags on all 4-corners.
Irishpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 12:44 PM   #8
jgh64pkup
Sunburst C10!!!
 
jgh64pkup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,560
Re: stroking a 350

thanks what size heads do you think i should use for a 383
about 480hp or so
__________________
Gage
1967 C10 Shortbed Stepside
jgh64pkup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 01:30 PM   #9
ProStreet71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Huntingdon,TN
Posts: 95
Re: stroking a 350

My pick would be the Air Flow Research 195's. If you dont go with those I would look for something with no more than 200cc runners. Dart and Trick Flow also make decent heads. But for the money nothing compares to the AFR's IMO....
ProStreet71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 03:26 PM   #10
jgh64pkup
Sunburst C10!!!
 
jgh64pkup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,560
Re: stroking a 350

what about rhs
__________________
Gage
1967 C10 Shortbed Stepside
jgh64pkup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 03:41 PM   #11
BossHogg69
motor exploder
 
BossHogg69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,346
Re: stroking a 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProStreet71 View Post
My pick would be the Air Flow Research 195's. If you dont go with those I would look for something with no more than 200cc runners. Dart and Trick Flow also make decent heads. But for the money nothing compares to the AFR's IMO....
100% agree - most people make big mistakes here with the 'bigger is better' on the heads and cam... I'd stay around 195 or 200cc on a 383 that's not an all out race motor. You want to find out how much cfm you'll need to hit your hp goal, and find a head with the smallest port volume that meets that number. meaning, sure you can find a cheap 210-220cc port head that flows well, but I'd be willing to bet that an AFR195 will flow just as much and still offer plenty of low end and midrange torque that the big ports won't have.
__________________
Adam

1969 Chevy CST/10 stepside, DART Big M/TREMEC Magnum Extreme/3.73's w/Detroit Truetrac
1965 Chevy Bel Air Wagon (daily driver), 327/TH350,10 bolt w/3.08's
1961 Chevy Bel Air Sport Coupe, ZZ454/M21/9" rear w/3.50's & Detroit Truetrac
2005 GMC 1500 ccsb 2wd, 6.0L/4L65e/3.73 G80
2006 GMC 2500HD ccsb 4x4, DMax LBZ/Allison 6spd/4.56's w/Detroit TrueTrac

Use the SEARCH function on this forum - it is your friend!!
BossHogg69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 12:09 AM   #12
Marv D
Registered Truck Offender
 
Marv D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
Re: stroking a 350

I built a 383 using a set of RHS Vortec heads, ported a GMPP Vortec TBI intake to accept a big Holley TBI, hydraulic roller,, and out it in my 94 4x4 TOW TRUCK. Trust me it ought to be illegal to mention RHS and AFR in the same post. Not even CLOSE to comparing. And besides,, AFR is will guarentee fow numbers (on a reputable bence) to be +/- 1% of advertised. Try to get that out of RHS!! I promise you you wont, and they wont!

Like shortbead is saying I'm not trying to badmouth RHS, they make a good head for what they are and for what they are intended for. But they pale in comparison to a AFR anything.
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age!

When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead.
.....It's kinda the same when your STUPID.


I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral.
Marv D is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com