The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2016, 02:09 AM   #51
71CHEVYSHORTBED402
Senior Member
 
71CHEVYSHORTBED402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 7,186
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

I like factory stance and a bit lower.
__________________
Tony
71 Custom Deluxe, SWB, 2WD, 402, A/C. I developed an assm. guide "kit" for restoring the truck from ground up. With assys, the guide accts for 1000s details, OEM identifications & part numbers, written in short order. 700+ images of assm., illust., charts, and points of interest. Much of the info. applies to all 67-72 GM trucks, and to a lessor degree all 67-72 GM vehicles. My build thread, and more on the guide https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=730025
71CHEVYSHORTBED402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 06:07 AM   #52
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,862
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

My '67 GMC shortbed retro rod will be lowered in a way to allow hauling and towing. Not slammed, lowered. No c-notch, bumper hitch...a total balance of form and function. I haven't owned a car in over 20 years. My kind of truck has 8-lugs, but it's nice to have a runabout shortbed set up to handle, haul, and scoot boot on down the road when you are a truck guy like me. I'm in a national antique truck club where when you say "truck" they don't think of these little 4-wheelers. They think of this or bigger. There are trucks and there are pickups in their minds. Different strokes. live and let live. I like' em all
Name:  image.jpg
Views: 420
Size:  57.6 KB
Name:  05040006_JPG.jpg
Views: 389
Size:  50.0 KB
Name:  00J0J_cAq3JB1ldGn_1200x900.jpg
Views: 393
Size:  73.1 KB

It bothers me to see a medium duty rendered useless (IMO) by making it a pickup. Cool to look at. Thought of this decades ago. But, my strong adherence to the balance of form and function prohibits it.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 06:10 AM   #53
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,862
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

My '67 GMC shortbed retro rod will be lowered in a way to allow hauling and towing. Not slammed, lowered. No c-notch, bumper hitch...a total balance of form and function. I haven't owned a car in over 20 years. My kind of truck has 8-lugs, but it's nice to have a runabout shortbed set up to handle, haul, and scoot boot on down the road when you are a truck guy like me. I'm in a national antique truck club where when you say "truck" they don't think of these little 4-wheelers. They think of this or bigger. There are trucks and there are pickups in their minds. Different strokes. live and let live. I like' em all
Attachment 1562568
Attachment 1562567
Attachment 1562566

It bothers me to see a medium duty rendered useless (IMO) by making it a pickup. Cool to look at. Thought of this decades ago. But, my strong adherence to the balance of form and function prohibits it.

Love it:
Name:  stock gmc fenderside.jpg
Views: 370
Size:  54.4 KB

Both are my kind of car:
Name:  1106cct-02-o-+1967-chevrolet-c10-fleetside+rear.jpg
Views: 370
Size:  87.9 KB
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 09:33 AM   #54
68bowtie
Senior Member
 
68bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Turlock, CA
Posts: 8,527
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

this seems to be the rarity these days...

Name:  image.jpg
Views: 356
Size:  39.3 KB
__________________
I live in California, but identify as a Texan
"If a job's worth doing, it's worth doing well"

Survivor "Lil’ Mint" (67 c10 40k mile light green original paint)
Project "C10 Fever" (68 factory black 396 swb)
Project "Little Sister" (70 c10 blue original paint refresh)
Project "Blue Bomb" (70 c30 blue original paint refresh) SOLD
Project "Vitamin C" (71 c10 orange original paint refresh) SOLD
68bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 10:21 AM   #55
Eddie H.
Registered User
 
Eddie H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Paradise TX USA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

I like mine stock.

Some show trucks look ok to me if they are lowered a little bit, but not dragging in the dirt.

To each his own.
__________________
"Negative people always seem to have a problem for every solution"
Eddie H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 11:30 AM   #56
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

I actually like the trucks real low, low, stock, and lifted. At any given stance these trucks look good, which is why so many people love them... however, what can ruin any of the stances is the wrong wheels and tires (well, something I don't like) A really low truck can look ridiculous with the wrong wheels as well as a stock or lifted one.
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 11:32 AM   #57
Ekliptix
Registered User
 
Ekliptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 677
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

It's a pretty personal preference. For a 1/2 ton 2wd, I definitely prefer a lowered look. I guess I consider it a sport truck. For 4x4s or 3/4 tons, stock height is my jam, or a slight lift with tires. If I had a rare, original truck I'd probably leave it alone....maybe.

Mine as bought (had a slight lowering and rake).


After 4.5/6" ECE drop
Ekliptix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 07:59 PM   #58
70 shorty
Where's my beer?
 
70 shorty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 1,768
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

I've got no problem at all with a slight drop, but the frame scraping seems ridiculous to me. My truck's main purpose is to be used as a truck, so, dropping it isn't in the cards for mine.
__________________
70 C10, shortstep, .30 over 250,Hurst shifted 3 spd parts hauler. Holley 390, Clifford Intake, Header, ported cylinder head, unknown bigger cam.
79 Corvette L82, 4 spd, black, red interior, headers, flowmasters, and unkown bigger cam.
'03 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.0 4x4 daily driver. 165K miles, and runs great
'08 Tahoe LTZ 4x4 155K
70 shorty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 08:21 PM   #59
dmjlambert
Senior Member
 
dmjlambert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,619
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

I prefer the factory stance and plain skinny steel wheels, and close to factory tire size. During 47 years it kind of lowers itself a little bit.
dmjlambert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 08:30 PM   #60
71veronica
Registered User
 
71veronica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: pleasant grove, UT
Posts: 399
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

I like lowered swb 2wd but stock and lifted for everything else. Not a fan of slamed trucks that's just my opinion,but with that said I do respect the time and hard work for a slamed truck. Life would be boring if all of our trucks looked the same.
71veronica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 10:56 PM   #61
garyd1961
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Henderson NC
Posts: 975
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

Getting just a little of topic. I just installed a new motor and trans. One thing I made sure of is even though I have an electric fuel pump and MSD ignition and rewired everything under the hood, I made sure everything works just as it did when it left the factory. I don't have any extra switches or buttons to push. Any little old lady from my church could get in and drive off without any problem.
BTW, I don't have a real problem with a slight drop, just not my thing but a slammed truck looks ridiculous.
garyd1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 11:08 PM   #62
In The Ten Ring
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 6,421
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

Factory stance lover here.

*This may be my second post on this thread, getting so I cannot remember anymore.
In The Ten Ring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2016, 01:10 AM   #63
timski69gmc
Registered User
 
timski69gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cranbrook, BC
Posts: 253
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

Mine has been lowered pretty much since I bought it. But, cut coils, and make shift drop didn't ride great. A few years ago I raised it back to stock height. Sure drove a lot nicer. But to me, it lost some of its personality. And I had to hop a touch to get into it, and I'm 6'0. My 5'0 wife had to haul herself in. So the following year I lowered it again. Not as low as previous, but a nice compromise. Besides, when a guy pulled up beside me and said "Nice truck. Is it a 4 wheel drive?" I knew it had to go back down. But I love them all heights.
Attached Images
  

Last edited by timski69gmc; 08-20-2016 at 01:13 AM. Reason: Upside down picture, and typos. Oops!
timski69gmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2016, 10:51 AM   #64
ck5566
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rancho Mirage, Ca.
Posts: 875
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

wrong answer

Last edited by ck5566; 08-22-2016 at 10:58 AM.
ck5566 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2016, 10:56 AM   #65
ck5566
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rancho Mirage, Ca.
Posts: 875
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyd1961 View Post
I just don't get why they think it's better. They go through a lot of trouble and even cut the frame for what may be just a fad. Some of the lowered short beds look ok but I have seen some lowered that to me just doesn't look right at all.
The same with the big wheels but at least they are easy to change. Maybe I'm just getting old but I like the old school look not the latest fad look.
This is what I wanted too say.

I don't know fit you are but for some of us changing a 97 lb wheel & tire is a real chore. I bought my truck with 22" wheels & tires being right at 97 lbs each.

They were the FIRST THINGS TO GO. Amen for that.
ck5566 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2016, 11:09 AM   #66
ck5566
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rancho Mirage, Ca.
Posts: 875
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

Quote:
Originally Posted by timski69gmc View Post
Mine has been lowered pretty much since I bought it. But, cut coils, and make shift drop didn't ride great. A few years ago I raised it back to stock height. Sure drove a lot nicer. But to me, it lost some of its personality. And I had to hop a touch to get into it, and I'm 6'0. My 5'0 wife had to haul herself in. So the following year I lowered it again. Not as low as previous, but a nice compromise. Besides, when a guy pulled up beside me and said "Nice truck. Is it a 4 wheel drive?" I knew it had to go back down. But I love them all heights.
I take it the lower picture is were your truck sits now? What did you use for the Drop? Drop springs (what size's) and or lowering blocks (what size's) maybe Bags? Show and tell please.
ck5566 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2016, 10:11 PM   #67
YBNORML
Registered User
 
YBNORML's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 3,847
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

I lower everything I own, I've always done it and I like it that way. Sometimes just a bit, sometimes a lot. It is a very divisive subject, but the thing i notice is that while most lowered guys will not insult another persons choices, whereas I've seen time and time again where stock or factory type car guys will take every opportunity to say how hideous or useless or I've ruined my truck or whatever ignorant comment they can think of. Its brutal and ruins the hobby for everyone.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jason.

68’ GMC shortbox
https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=794201

72' 2WD Blazer
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=425385

67' LongBox C-10
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=691845

InstaGram ybnorml67
YBNORML is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2016, 10:21 PM   #68
YBNORML
Registered User
 
YBNORML's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 3,847
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

And for the record, I use them to haul just like they did before.
Attached Images
 
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jason.

68’ GMC shortbox
https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=794201

72' 2WD Blazer
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=425385

67' LongBox C-10
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=691845

InstaGram ybnorml67
YBNORML is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2016, 10:49 PM   #69
RonG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Torrance, ca
Posts: 32
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

Have to drop my two cents in the pot. I like moderation...my '69 C10 short/step is front spindle dropped 2 and 1/2 inches and the back 3 inches via coils. I like the stock height, also slightly raised. Depends on owner personal preference and truck usage. Well, I feel better now.

Last edited by RonG; 08-31-2016 at 10:50 PM. Reason: Oops!
RonG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 12:07 AM   #70
timski69gmc
Registered User
 
timski69gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cranbrook, BC
Posts: 253
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ck5566 View Post
I take it the lower picture is were your truck sits now? What did you use for the Drop? Drop springs (what size's) and or lowering blocks (what size's) maybe Bags? Show and tell please.
I think it is 1 1/2 coils cut in the front, and 5" drop coil in the back. My next item on the list is drop spindles and converting to disc brakes. Would like to keep the same height, just more travel. The back seems to be fine where it is. Longer term, would eventually like to do bags. Drop A-arms and out back blocks with a c-notch would be ideal. At his point it wouldn't have to frame out, but I hear it's an addiction. :0)
timski69gmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 01:15 AM   #71
BigMike
Registered User
 
BigMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita - SoCal
Posts: 1,432
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

Quote:
Originally Posted by YBNORML View Post
I lower everything I own, I've always done it and I like it that way. Sometimes just a bit, sometimes a lot. It is a very divisive subject, but the thing i notice is that while most lowered guys will not insult another persons choices, whereas I've seen time and time again where stock or factory type car guys will take every opportunity to say how hideous or useless or I've ruined my truck or whatever ignorant comment they can think of. Its brutal and ruins the hobby for everyone.
I agree with YBNORML all the way. I too have lowered almost every vehicle I have ever had (almost 100) and I always will until I am 6ft under. I always appreciate the amount of work that a person has put into their vehicle whether I like it or not & the last thing I would ever do is bash someone or put down their vehicle because it wasn't my taste (unless it's a Mustang - jk). If I wanted a lowered car I would have bought a car & lowered it, but I don't. I want a lowered truck so that's what I bought. Mine is bagged so I can raise it to stock height & haul whatever, or I can slam it to the ground. Mine rides and handles better than any stock truck I have ever driven. If it is done right you won't have parts falling off every time you hit a bump.

The funniest thing I have ever heard someone say about lowered vehicles is that it's a fad. Yup, a "fad".... that started after WWII and has been going strong ever since.

We are all truck lovers here, so lets just love trucks and agree to disagree on what each of us thinks cool. If you don't like it don't put it down, it's not your truck, it's mine!
BigMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 11:35 AM   #72
jus2qwk
Registered User
 
jus2qwk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 591
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

well I might as well chime in. its all in what you want to do with the truck for me, my truck is a show truck/ hot rod/ weekend cruiser. Mine has always rode great and I've never once said I wish it wasnt lowered. like I said I treat my truck like a hotrod not a truck. Ive always liked the fact that there are so many out here that its great to see everyone put their personal touches and taste on them. I honestly like them all just prefer them the 2wd lowered. 4wd I like stock or lifted.

my c10



and my duramax
__________________
Corey Jones Designs
CoreyJonesDesigns on instagram
Ole Silver- 1967 stepside
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/1103c...chevrolet-c10/
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=598758
jus2qwk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 01:29 PM   #73
NGN
Registered User
 
NGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Old Bridge,NJ
Posts: 820
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?

I dropped my 67 short bed four inches out back , I like the level look along with the 73 on up truck rallie wheels , it's still rides the same and being 5'6" it happens to make it easier getting in and out , don't get me wrong I can't wait to be climbing in out 67-72 four wheeler of my own ,,,with a little lift.
Posted via Mobile Device
NGN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com