The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2020, 10:11 PM   #1
adis
Registered User
 
adis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 82
Opinions on TPI Setup

Start off, I know nothing about Chevy engines specifically and next to nothing about engines generally.So, I apologize if this is a silly question. The 350 in my ‘80 1 ton is a generic Chevy LT9 (if I decoded correctly: V0331TJW) with equally generic 462625 heads. It’s got some sort of Edelbrock 4 barrel carb on a steel intake. It runs fine and I’m content with the power level. My truck is used for home projects, hauling dirt or sod or garbage to the dump, etc. It gets about 10 mpg and is difficult to start even in warm weather (manual choke), although once warm it is fine. I do take it on the highway but I do not believe that I run it much over 5000 rpm (no tach). I have not (yet) pulled any stumps with it...

I’ve read about the L98 TPI and in the context of most of the discussions I’ve read (usually with respect to gaining HP) everyone usually comments that, given the torque production across low and mid rpm range, the L98 would be “a great truck engine.” It seemed to me that if this were true, I could benefit from more reliable starts (particularly in cold weather), perhaps a bit of a bump in fuel economy, and maybe even an increase in torque production that fits within the typical operating range of my current engine.

So, my question is, is it feasible to install a TPI (intake, injection, computer, basically all of it) on to my generic SBC as is, and get it running for an amount that wouldn’t cost more than simply buying some relatively cheap later generation engine. Say I got the TPI for $500 and everything worked. If I worked out the fuel, and got it tuned right would it, in fact, be a good truck engine, and would the mod result in the improvements I would be seeking?

Sorry for the ramble, and thanks for any opinions.
__________________
'80 K30 c&c std cab dually (CKM33AB 10000 GVW)
D60(4.10)/350 crate/400/205/14
adis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 10:49 PM   #2
Warrens69GMC
Registered User
 
Warrens69GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,613
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

The TPI is a great truck motor, but I would hesitate to use it on your current engine. Your best bet is to get a Corvette/Camaro/Firebird complete car for the transplant - it would include the 700R4 overdrive transmission. This would prevent you from mixing parts and possible giving up on the swap.

You could also go with a 5.3ls swap and the 4L60e.

Both should cost around the same to swap over, around 5k of you only do the basics and you do most of the work yourself.
Warrens69GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 09:25 AM   #3
adis
Registered User
 
adis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 82
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

Thanks for the reply. I was thinking of the swap as more a cheap alternative to an aftermarket TBI or similar system. As I said I’m happy with the 350-400-205 setup I’ve got, I just thought the TPI might be a way to address some of the issues mentioned above. Short of finding a vey good deal on a complete running L98, if I was going to sink $5K into this vehicle, I would do Just what you suggest with a Vortec swap. But this truck is not worth it for how I use it. I guess the TPI isn’t something that you can just bolt onto any gen 1-2 SBC and with a proper tune enjoy whatever kind of benefits it might offer over what I’ve got now (a poorly tuned carb) - even with, say a properly matched cam.
__________________
'80 K30 c&c std cab dually (CKM33AB 10000 GVW)
D60(4.10)/350 crate/400/205/14
adis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 10:22 AM   #4
Bigdav160
Registered User
 
Bigdav160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Klein Texas
Posts: 3,852
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

Quote:
I guess the TPI isn’t something that you can just bolt onto any gen 1-2 SBC
I have run a couple different TPI engines in my trucks but I cannot remember all the details. Some years bolt on other years need some slight modifications.
__________________
My Classics:
'72 K20 Suburban + '65 Dodge Town Wagon
'72 Corvette Roadster +'67 Corvette Roadster
'73 Z-28 Camaro
'63 Ford SWB Uni Pickup
'50 Ford Coupe
Bigdav160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 04:58 PM   #5
LS short box
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 1,923
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

In the MPLS area there is company called TPIS. They have done a lot work on the TPI systems over the years. Might give them a call for advice.
LS short box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 08:26 PM   #6
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,560
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS short box View Post
In the MPLS area there is company called TPIS. They have done a lot work on the TPI systems over the years. Might give them a call for advice.
The hot ticket with the TPI if your willing to mix, and match. Is to use the 411 pcm, and a Vortec distributor.

The LS is a better bet by the time your done. Unless you have a love for the tpi
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2020, 01:27 AM   #7
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,726
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

Do you have an Edelbrock carb on the stock cast Iron Quadrajet manifold? Reason I ask is that sometimes I have seen that combo get a vacuum leak at the base of the carb where it seals to the intake. When its idling some WD40 sprayed at the carb base can reveal a vacum leak. If the idle picks up when you spray it...its got a vacuum leak. Maybe you need an adapter for your carb like this.... https://www.ebay.com/p/191985532?iid...CABEgKzWvD_BwE check out what the first review has to say for this item.

Last edited by AcampoDave; 05-12-2020 at 01:38 AM.
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2020, 10:51 AM   #8
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,921
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

Seems like a lot of money and work for something that can be "fixed" with probably the correct carb setup and an ignition tune up.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2020, 12:10 PM   #9
toolboxchev
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: 2nd left past the stump on a dirt road.
Posts: 2,629
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

Those motors did produce good torque numbers down low. Me on the other hand did not like the very few years they produced them.

My novice understanding is that everything for them is very specific. Lots of stuff does not cross over.

Someone gave me one of those motors in the 2 bolt variation. I ended up selling it for a core.

Roller cammed TBI were a bit more common with lots of them still in use. 4 bolt main varieties used throughout the 3/4 ton truck lineup.

I come from the Era of Simplicity, so its kinda hard to change my thinking. Most likely a good tuneup and checking/fixing vac leaks and other issues is going to be WAY cheaper in the long run. You may gain a 1-2 miles a gallon either way driving a brick. Those TPI's are not cheap when you have all the electronic issues/parts sorted out.

My 2 cents.
toolboxchev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2020, 10:10 PM   #10
Warrens69GMC
Registered User
 
Warrens69GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,613
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

Quote:
Originally Posted by toolboxchev View Post

Roller cammed TBI were a bit more common with lots of them still in use. 4 bolt main varieties used throughout the 3/4 ton truck lineup.

...My 2 cents.
No roller cammed vin k (TBI) in trucks, 4 bolts in trucks only with flat tappet cams - not all are roller capable.

TBI - 1987-1995, 1996 for vans
Vortec had roller cams - 1996-2002 including vans
Warrens69GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2020, 12:58 PM   #11
A1971Blazer
Senior Member
 
A1971Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 2,107
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

I bought a wrecked but running and driving..... '92 Trans Am with the 5.0 TPI
I put the engine in a Jeep that was purpose built for off-roading/rock crawling
It had great power off idle and lots of torque...which was perfect for my application
Reliability was excellent....and it just looks cool with the intake runners...
There are still several vendors that offer tuning for the TPI....I know where there's a complete 5.7 one for sale for 1K...have thought several times about buying it to put in my '70 K/5...
The Corvette L98 had aluminum heads....the Camaro and TransAm were iron heads
__________________
1967 C10 Step side
1968 C10 Step side
1970 Chevrolet K/5 Blazer
1972 Chevrolet K/5 Blazer
.............
A1971Blazer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2020, 05:05 PM   #12
RichardJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,413
Re: Opinions on TPI Setup

The '87 and up L98 Corvette 350 had Alum heads and roller cam ( A small number of '86 did also).
By themselves, the L98 Alum heads are considered junk, but they are part of what gives the L98 its' low end torque.

The L98 Corvette had 2.59:1 rear gears PLUS the .70 overdrive in the 700r4. That's tall.
I have always thought the L98 as a complete package would make a good truck engine, but only as a complete package.

If you found a complete, original '87-'91 alum head, roller cam L98, I'd say go for it.
Most of the Camaro/Firebird TPI engines were the LB9 305 in. version and look identical.
__________________
'67 GMC 2500, 292, 4spd, AC
RichardJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com