The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-17-2011, 12:40 AM   #1
dmartin1
Registered User
 
dmartin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: mohave valley,arizona
Posts: 1,088
pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

so tomorrow im buying a 1973 shortbed stepside wood bed.original owner never touched or molested.
i want this baby on the GROUND on bags.
theres jyust way too many pages in the sticky of shortbed pics to find the slammed stepsides.

anyone got pics of some slammed down stepsides with some nice medium- medium/big wheels?

thanks! i hope they look good on the ground.
__________________
1969 Shortbed in progress
1982 short step, few suspension and motor upgrades.getting a 468
1978 Shortbed fleet side bonanza fully loaded
1978 k20 Silverado loaded.currently engine-less
1989 k10 suburban 9" lift
65 nova
And more
dmartin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 04:04 PM   #2
SYCOTIK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 34
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Here's how mine looked before the teardown for complete build. Its on 22s...


Posted via Mobile Device
SYCOTIK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 07:36 PM   #3
higgiec10
Registered User
 
higgiec10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: baytown
Posts: 243
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Name:  33999_104752356242252_100001224638131_33269_7223726_n.jpg
Views: 8795
Size:  25.2 KB
not mine just want i have saved on lap top
Name:  207035_176292055754948_100001224638131_454475_678231_n.jpg
Views: 19963
Size:  41.3 KB

Name:  DSC_6639.jpg
Views: 10735
Size:  59.1 KB

Name:  28501_403860516834_638606834_4834592_151244_n.jpg
Views: 12685
Size:  57.5 KB

Name:  106201010703AM821.jpg
Views: 8894
Size:  60.6 KB
higgiec10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 07:41 PM   #4
higgiec10
Registered User
 
higgiec10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: baytown
Posts: 243
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

not mine
Name:  71.jpg
Views: 8706
Size:  57.5 KB

Name:  122.jpg
Views: 8732
Size:  67.3 KB

Name:  125.jpg
Views: 9045
Size:  68.0 KB

Name:  0709cct_03_z+1974_chevy_c10+ (2).jpg
Views: 14605
Size:  62.1 KB

Name:  Large1633!2006-10-13!22H11M8S.jpg
Views: 9029
Size:  55.8 KB
higgiec10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 01:49 PM   #5
Low84
Registered User
 
Low84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Roma,TX
Posts: 774
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Does anybody know the size of the rims on that last orange stepside? Or a good guesser
Low84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 01:51 PM   #6
Low84
Registered User
 
Low84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Roma,TX
Posts: 774
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?


Low84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 01:52 PM   #7
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,684
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

looks like 17's.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 02:02 PM   #8
Low84
Registered User
 
Low84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Roma,TX
Posts: 774
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Thanks! Appreciate the help.
Low84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 07:53 PM   #9
el_bole
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chula Vista CA
Posts: 195
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

I too have a 1973 c10 however its just a rolling chassis at this point, going to drop a '61cab on it(gonna get it fabbed)....Does any one know of any issues of dropping a '73?

One person told me that you "can't lower it as low as a '65 to '72"....So before I put $ into lowering it I want to know for sure...

Thanks,
el_bole
el_bole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 08:43 PM   #10
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Quote:
Originally Posted by el_bole View Post
One person told me that you "can't lower it as low as a '65 to '72"....
That person did not have a clue as to what they were talking about. The pictures show that you can lower a 73-87 just fine with the same components as the prior generations.

The big limiting factor here is the stepside bed. They do present thier own unique challenges to get really low.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 10:23 PM   #11
el_bole
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chula Vista CA
Posts: 195
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Thanks N2TRUX,

I thought it was all BS just dont want to spend a bunch of time and $ and have a half a$$ lowering job.

I am going to use an older stepside bed ('55-'66) on the truck. Will this be an issue? I want 5" out back and 3" in the front (drop spindles/lowering springs)...Down the road I would possibly bag it and want to lay frame with it. Thanks again for the info...

elbole

Down t

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
That person did not have a clue as to what they were talking about. The pictures show that you can lower a 73-87 just fine with the same components as the prior generations.

The big limiting factor here is the stepside bed. They do present thier own unique challenges to get really low.
el_bole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 11:05 PM   #12
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

el_bole, a 5" drop in the rear is cake. Once you go to bags that when you start running in to issue with fender clearance. I am no expert on steppers, just passing on what I have read here.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 11:16 PM   #13
el_bole
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chula Vista CA
Posts: 195
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Thanks again N2TRUX....look forward to posting her here when I.m done with my '61/'73 truck lol....

Going to go with Western Chassis kit from JCwhitney ($260), not want to shell out lots for DJM or Belltech...its just my fun truck,,,any whoo thanks again....

elbole

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
el_bole, a 5" drop in the rear is cake. Once you go to bags that when you start running in to issue with fender clearance. I am no expert on steppers, just passing on what I have read here.
el_bole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 02:38 AM   #14
Low84
Registered User
 
Low84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Roma,TX
Posts: 774
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Quote:
Originally Posted by el_bole View Post
I too have a 1973 c10 however its just a rolling chassis at this point, going to drop a '61cab on it(gonna get it fabbed)....Does any one know of any issues of dropping a '73?

One person told me that you "can't lower it as low as a '65 to '72"....So before I put $ into lowering it I want to know for sure...

Thanks,
el_bole
Are you sure that you didn't misunderstand the guy? Having said you can't lower a square like a "65-72". Because that isn't a complete lie, being that those previous two generations had the trailing arm rear suspension where it's springs on all corners (light duty trucks) and squares have leafs. So you can lower them the same height but not in the same manner.

The front I'm not familiar with those generation trucks, but I'm assuming they don't have ridiculously low cross member like the squares have.
Low84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 03:31 PM   #15
el_bole
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chula Vista CA
Posts: 195
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Low84 View Post
Are you sure that you didn't misunderstand the guy? Having said you can't lower a square like a "65-72". Because that isn't a complete lie, being that those previous two generations had the trailing arm rear suspension where it's springs on all corners (light duty trucks) and squares have leafs. So you can lower them the same height but not in the same manner.

The front I'm not familiar with those generation trucks, but I'm assuming they don't have ridiculously low cross member like the squares have.
Low84,

It was an email sent to me by the leader of a truck club so maybe I did misunderstand but he suggested taking the disc brake components(crossmember) and putting it on a '60's frame so I'd be able to lower it, meaning the 60's frame was more lowerable(is that a word?).

I dont want to go through all that hassle, and you are right in your assumption the cross member is not super low. However there is a hug "dip" in the middle of it.....Im just happy that I can lower that sucker as low as I wanna LOL...

thanks,

elbole

P.S. one day I want a square body truck I think they are way cool, what do you think of an '86? Might get a early seventies junker and put '86 clip on it(NO SMOG)

Th
el_bole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 05:05 PM   #16
Low84
Registered User
 
Low84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Roma,TX
Posts: 774
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

Quote:
Originally Posted by el_bole View Post
Low84,

It was an email sent to me by the leader of a truck club so maybe I did misunderstand but he suggested taking the disc brake components(crossmember) and putting it on a '60's frame so I'd be able to lower it, meaning the 60's frame was more lowerable(is that a word?).

I dont want to go through all that hassle, and you are right in your assumption the cross member is not super low. However there is a hug "dip" in the middle of it.....Im just happy that I can lower that sucker as low as I wanna LOL...

thanks,

elbole

P.S. one day I want a square body truck I think they are way cool, what do you think of an '86? Might get a early seventies junker and put '86 clip on it(NO SMOG)

Th
Got ya. Yeah that's what I meant with the crossmember, I actually caught a manhole lid with it once on my 84 stopped me dry!

Well I'll tell you what, my 84 cab is shot. I picked up a complete 78 to piece out and I couldn't get myself to do it. Now I have two projects. Both front clips are great looking!
Low84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 11:07 PM   #17
rjtallo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: hammond la
Posts: 3
Re: pics of slammed/bagged stepsides?

My 82....chopped...accuair e-level...ls1...raceline 22x8.5front , 24x15 rear
Attached Images
 
rjtallo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 01:15 AM   #18
Rockbottom78
Registered User
 
Rockbottom78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Whitecourt AB
Posts: 65
Here mine. Bagged. Pancaked the crossmember. 10" axle notches in the rear. Soon to be cupping the bags in the control arms to get a couple more inches south in the front. I have miles of room to play with in the rear. Only 15s on it though
Posted via Mobile Device
Attached Images
 
Rockbottom78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com