The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2004, 07:50 PM   #26
RON WOODGEARD
Resident Young Old Dude !
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,948
This is something I have never done any research on,,, and don't care to, But if "THEY" are trying to make Corn into a fuel, They should find some "Moonshiners" to help them out... Both my Grandfather, and Great Grandfather Made Shine,,
It's not a secret, that shine made the vehicle run far better then Gasoline.. The smell in the fermenting, blending process is Nasty.. But so is the smell of a Paper Plant..( as anyone in Lewiston Idaho can attest to)..
RON WOODGEARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 08:01 PM   #27
grayw0lf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clanton, AL
Posts: 1,253
I think we all need to setup out own stills & save some cash & mixing our own ethanol/gasoline mix fuel! Does anyone have some copper tubing sitting around?
__________________
85' CUCV M1009!!! The newest addition!
6.2diesel, Th400, NP208, & only 36k miles!
70' C-10 LWB Fleetside - Looking good these days!
05' Dodge Neon
88' Winner Escape Sport 1750 - 4.3v6
94' Seadoo SP
84' Honda TRX200, bare nekkid. Just a frame & tires.

Always looking for another project or any good deal!

grayw0lf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 08:37 PM   #28
Jeepster376
Registered User
 
Jeepster376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 269
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_...rth/meCh8.html
__________________
72 Cheyenne Super 4x4 SWB
Jeepster376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 09:21 PM   #29
Jeepster376
Registered User
 
Jeepster376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 269
If we had that stuff around here, I'd rejet my truck for it in a heartbeat.
Attached Images
 
__________________
72 Cheyenne Super 4x4 SWB
Jeepster376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 09:28 PM   #30
stelth2002
Young Gun wth Fast Inline
 
stelth2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,475
RON, I lived close andc drove thru lewiston all the time for a couple years. I would never live there by choice because of that. As jeepster has found many good documents. At the university i had saw research of positive energy coming out of ethanol. In fact i helped out with some engines that ran off pure ethanol and they could scream. I surely believe that with some more research that costs and the inneffieceies will decrease. But in the near future i do believe fuel will drastically change forms.
__________________
1967 Chevrolet LWB with built 292! 415 ft. lbs of torque, 4 speed :O with 27% overdrive too, 3.73 Posi. Frame and body done... getting painted!!!
stelth2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 09:31 PM   #31
stelth2002
Young Gun wth Fast Inline
 
stelth2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,475
Jeepster is that price of 86 cents for pure ethanol? I cant read the pic.
__________________
1967 Chevrolet LWB with built 292! 415 ft. lbs of torque, 4 speed :O with 27% overdrive too, 3.73 Posi. Frame and body done... getting painted!!!
stelth2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 09:52 PM   #32
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelth2002
Jeepster is that price of 86 cents for pure ethanol? I cant read the pic.
That was for a promo a few weeks ago.
__________________
Just sitting here contemplating contemplation.
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 12:04 AM   #33
Jeepster376
Registered User
 
Jeepster376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelth2002
Jeepster is that price of 86 cents for pure ethanol? I cant read the pic.
I don't know about the promo, I just found the pic on the web somewhere. But it's E-85 fuel. I guess the .85¢ price is cuz it's an E-85 promo.

I don't know what ethanol costs dollarwise, but it's gotta be more than that. Last I knew I thought it was about $4. a gallon.
__________________
72 Cheyenne Super 4x4 SWB
Jeepster376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 12:55 AM   #34
Jeepster376
Registered User
 
Jeepster376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68 Suburban
That was for a promo a few weeks ago.
So how much is E-85???
__________________
72 Cheyenne Super 4x4 SWB
Jeepster376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 02:33 PM   #35
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
I think it is a few cent cheaper than unleaded.
__________________
Just sitting here contemplating contemplation.
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 03:36 PM   #36
cheyenne10
Senior Member
 
cheyenne10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,511
New car

Just bought new Chev sub. and 5.3 motor is setup from factory to burn this also. Dealer stated it was available in midwest. If I remember right fuel economy rating quotes were about 25-30% less.
__________________
Bob
cheyenne10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 04:38 PM   #37
Bamm
Cowboy Fan for Life!!!!!!
 
Bamm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Amelia, Virginia
Posts: 2,921
Help me here, if it's just a few cents cheaper thank regular, what would be the incentive to use it with a loss in power and efficiency?
__________________
1967 ShortBed Fleetside
3/4 Drop 350/700R4
Tilt wheel
18 x 8 Torque Thrust II's
Future mods: All new gauges & wood bed
My Zip is 23002
I ship UPS, USPS
Bamm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 04:59 PM   #38
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bamm 24
Help me here, if it's just a few cents cheaper thank regular, what would be the incentive to use it with a loss in power and efficiency?
You can run higher octane. Burns cleaner. In Illinois if you keep your reciepts and use it at least 50% of the time in a year, you can get a $500 tax credit. There are other incentives too. Depends on the state.
__________________
Just sitting here contemplating contemplation.
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 06:05 PM   #39
flip66
Registered User
 
flip66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Garland TX Dallas area
Posts: 658
I did some research on this a couple of years ago. smitty62 is right about the cost that is why you do not see it every where. from what I remember it would cost us about 2.50 a gallon if it was not sup by the gov.
flip66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 12:48 AM   #40
grayw0lf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clanton, AL
Posts: 1,253
Here's the crazy thing about ethanol fuels. It does Not mix well with gasoline. The ethanol they put into gas has to be at least 192+ proof. That usually requires laboratory conditions. Gasoline mixes well with alcohol. Alcohol mixes well with water. Alcohol also mixes well with water. Add all 3 together, & the water seperates out. Yeah, ouch!

What would be nice is if we went to alcohol fuels (no gasoline). Running straight alcohol, it only has to be 167 proof to run well. In fact, there is little performance difference between 167 & higher proofs. This would only require minimal fuel system modifications. Running a much higher compression ratio would really help. Alcohol does well on 13.5 to 15:1 compression ratios.

If they really wanted to, they could easily make alcohol as a low cost fuel & similarly priced alcohol burning autos. Look back at the Model T! Gasoline was hard to come by in much of the country around the turn of the century. The Model T ran just as well on alcohol as it did on gasoline. There were other alcohol powered vehicles as well.

Its just a matter of business. The world's economy is based on oil. Can you imagine the chaos in 3rd world countries if we quit (severly cut back) our insatiable thirst for the Black Devil Juice?
__________________
85' CUCV M1009!!! The newest addition!
6.2diesel, Th400, NP208, & only 36k miles!
70' C-10 LWB Fleetside - Looking good these days!
05' Dodge Neon
88' Winner Escape Sport 1750 - 4.3v6
94' Seadoo SP
84' Honda TRX200, bare nekkid. Just a frame & tires.

Always looking for another project or any good deal!

grayw0lf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 02:09 AM   #41
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip66
I did some research on this a couple of years ago. smitty62 is right about the cost that is why you do not see it every where. from what I remember it would cost us about 2.50 a gallon if it was not sup by the gov.
It is not as expensive to produce as it was a "couple" of years ago. As with everything. Price comes down with mass production.
__________________
Just sitting here contemplating contemplation.
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 07:34 AM   #42
mrein3
Registered User
 
mrein3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Center City, MN, USA
Posts: 3,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by grayw0lf
Here's the crazy thing about ethanol fuels. It does Not mix well with gasoline. The ethanol they put into gas has to be at least 192+ proof. That usually requires laboratory conditions. Gasoline mixes well with alcohol. Alcohol mixes well with water. Alcohol also mixes well with water. Add all 3 together, & the water seperates out. Yeah, ouch!
This is EXACTLY why I don't put the stuff in my smaller engines. I have read that if you leave ethanol blended fuel sit for a little as two weeks it will seperate and cause problems. Plus in some po-dunk little gas station the stuff in the tank in the ground could have already seperated. I have heard of folks pumping almost pure water out of the pump (after it seperated and the underground tank is near empty - remember oil/gas is lighter and "floats" above water).

I wish I had a nickle for every lawnmower I've seen thrown away "because it didn't run right after the winter". People leave that crap sit in their small engines all winter. The water seperates out. The carb bowl and needle and seat start to rust. The engine doesn't run right until somebody like me needs a free lawn mower and cleans up the parts.

I too can't figure out why some local governments specify the crap when you need to burn more of it to get from point A to point B.

Illinois has a $500 tax credit if you use it? A subsidy for using a product that is heavily subsidized to produce. Sounds like another winner of a government program.
__________________
'70 cab, '71 chassis, 383, TH350, NP205.
'71 Malibu convertible
'72 Malibu hard top
Center City, MN
mrein3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 08:37 AM   #43
grayw0lf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clanton, AL
Posts: 1,253
I don't know about it causing rust, it seems unlikely. Although, possible. Any ethanol blend is definately NOT recommended for smaller engines, especially 2 cycle. Any lawnmotor owner's guide will specify that.

I agree we have a long way to go before it is ever in mainstream use... Really, I don't think it ever will be in popular use. I think we will spend more to develop better diesel engines, until Hydrogen/electric hybrids start to take over.

Either way, I'll be old & grey before we move away from gasoline.
__________________
85' CUCV M1009!!! The newest addition!
6.2diesel, Th400, NP208, & only 36k miles!
70' C-10 LWB Fleetside - Looking good these days!
05' Dodge Neon
88' Winner Escape Sport 1750 - 4.3v6
94' Seadoo SP
84' Honda TRX200, bare nekkid. Just a frame & tires.

Always looking for another project or any good deal!

grayw0lf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2004, 11:15 PM   #44
57sailplane
Senior Member
 
57sailplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 583
well i looked on a farmer web based page. and it cost about 2.35 cents for corn to make one gallon of 100% pure corn fuel. thats just for the corn. not the production. and this is from a web site that is for making fuel. this bights because i think it would be an extreamly great alternative. when gas reaches 3.00 a gallon look out.
i like the idea of running the e85. yes i does not produce as many btu. but and i do mean but. our engines are made to run on 87 octane. e85 is 100 plus octaine. got you thinking yet. what do you think alcohol dragsters run on? why do you think they run it. if you increase the compresion ratio to were the fuel likes to run you will see major gains in hp and more than likely mpg also. i know that it runs a lot cleaner i mean a lot cleaner and if the correct parts are ran that engine will last a lot longer. engine temp being one reason for cleaner parts is because of the less btu produced. anyway you may want to look at alcohol aftermarket parts. definately need a new carb or kit for alcohol. stainless valves etc...
57sailplane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com