Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
01-19-2020, 07:07 PM | #1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Southwest Kansas
Posts: 306
|
Re: trailing arms: Goodmark vs. ECE vs. OEM
Quote:
__________________
'64 C10 LWB, 283, 5speed '68 C20 LWB, 327, 4speed '69 C20 Custom Camper Longhorn, 350, 4speed '72 C20 Cheyenne Super, 396, TH400 '66 C60, 292, 4speed Last edited by ElKotze; 01-19-2020 at 07:28 PM. |
|
01-19-2020, 08:13 PM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,917
|
Re: trailing arms: Goodmark vs. ECE vs. OEM
Quote:
Yes & no.... Flex beyond articulation is unecessay. Flex for articulation is quite necessary & the triangle (the rear T/A susension on C10's) used the original material choices for that. No flex for articulation means binding. Binding vs. smooth articulation can unsettle the suspension. A suspension that gets disturbed @ the wrong time is unpredictable. On the subject of rear sway bars.... Rear bars are used for specific reasons. Many install a rear sway bar 'because'. Because why? Because it's necessary? Because other guys have one? Because different vehicles have them & this GEN of C10 didn't so adding one is 'better' vs. not having one? If you install a rear sway bar, what size bar are you specifying? A rear bar if needed is supposed to compliment the front so the size up front matters when deciding what rear bar. Adding a sway bar to a T/A set-up that utilizes solid tube arms & non-flex style front bushings won't hurt simply because the set-up is already limiting articulation. It's your truck so use whatever you think is best (solid tube arms, poly bushings, & add a rear bar). Normal driving down the street to the burger joint, Cars & Coffee, or local show won't stress the suspension enough to notice a difference.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
01-19-2020, 08:34 PM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Southwest Kansas
Posts: 306
|
Re: trailing arms: Goodmark vs. ECE vs. OEM
Quote:
__________________
'64 C10 LWB, 283, 5speed '68 C20 LWB, 327, 4speed '69 C20 Custom Camper Longhorn, 350, 4speed '72 C20 Cheyenne Super, 396, TH400 '66 C60, 292, 4speed |
|
01-19-2020, 10:26 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,917
|
Re: trailing arms: Goodmark vs. ECE vs. OEM
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
01-19-2020, 10:39 PM | #5 |
Scrapper 1
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Riverside Calif
Posts: 1,649
|
Re: trailing arms: Goodmark vs. ECE vs. OEM
This is a funny one for most people that don't know what is what. Most hot rod builders go with them style Arm's thinking there better then factory Almost all custom builders say the factory stuff is stronger than the aftermarket.
If you're going for look's go custom if you're going to pound on it and use it for work stay with the factory. |
Bookmarks |
|
|