The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2020, 02:20 PM   #1
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,558
C10 vs C20 Suburban.

I am looking at a nice C10 Burb to be my driver, and get rid of my 18 Silverado. Since used car prices are high, and I maybe off work for atleast year due to knee issues. I am hoping not, but I rather make a move when financials skew to my favor. If need be that is.

Personally I grew very fond of light duty C20's because of the bigger brakes for driving hard, but honestly this is a Suburban. I won't be doing that, and I need + want a nice comfy highway cruiser. Honestly I can't remember what it was like to drive a C10 anymore, and I have never driven a Suburban older then 2007.

The tires will be roughly 255/60r15's on slot mags or torque thrust wheels, and lowered to fill the wheel wells nicely.

So do you guys who have them feel the brakes are perfectly fine or wish you had more braking power. More then Hawk pads, and rotors can give you let's say.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 02:49 PM   #2
kwmech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,387
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Given the weight of the Surburban I wonder why the factory even gave it a 10 designation. The 1/2 tons are ok if you are just driving around, but any towing at all they seem to fall short of stopping for my liking. Then there is the whole 10 bolt rear axle debacle. My current Suburban started life as a 1/2 ton and it is currently going through an upgrade to 8 lug and a full float rear
kwmech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 02:54 PM   #3
Greg58
Registered User
 
Greg58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Valley, NE.
Posts: 995
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

I had several K-10 square Suburbans, plus 1 94 1/2 ton in the past. they made me switch to the heavy duties!
I was towing car trailers, and using them for carpentry work trucks. The 10 bolt rearends are weak, the 700 transmissions are weak, the brakes are small.
Switched to 2500 and never looked back, any savings in fuel mileage was eaten up by more upkeep and repairs.
If I was looking to go older, I would find a clean 2500, 99-06, good brakes, tough transmission, bulletproof engines.
Just my 2 cents, Greg
__________________
________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande, 2500 133" wb, 402, 4spd.
2007 GMC 3500 SRW 4x4, Crew cab, Duramax/Allison. (Sold}
1987 Chevy Suburban 2500, Silverado, 2wd, 454, t-400
2023 Chevy Silverado LT 3500, crew cab, longbox, 4x4 Z-71 Duramax.
Greg58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 03:48 PM   #4
Factory Guy
Senior Member
 
Factory Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Midway USA Kentucky
Posts: 539
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

I know on my 3/4 ton truck the brakes are massive and I have never felt uncomfortable trying to to stop a heavy load with that truck. If you are towing or hauling the 3/4 to brakes (IMO) are a must have. I know in the after market you can get upgraded brakes, however that being said the 3/4 ton disc front rear drum do really well in stock form.
Attached Images
 
Factory Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 04:08 PM   #5
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,558
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

I have spent about 30 minutes looking up tow ratings, and can only find C20 Suburban ratings. Which is 7500 I think as I already forgot. Luckily I don't tow to much, but I do have to do it once in awhile.

So it must be really low. Off chance does anyone know the C10 Suburban tow capacity?

If I buy one I will shoot for a 3/4 ton, and or convert a 1/2 ton if need be.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 04:49 PM   #6
kwmech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,387
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Still have the owners manual for my 91. Nothing really that gives the info directly. Manual says to go off the 'frame mounted' hitch specs. 4000# dead weight with 400# tongue and up to 9500# with weight distribution at 1000# tongue. My 'burb was originally a 10 series 4x4. Bear in mind this was with a 10 bolt rear 3.73s with a gov-loc and a 700r4. Hope this helps
kwmech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 05:01 PM   #7
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,558
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Not really, but it seems to tell me if I load correctly I can tow what I usually tow. Which is a car on a trailer for about 6000 pounds minimum, and 7500 max. The trailer I use has the load distribution, and trailer brakes.

Mind you I only tow a handful times a year, and pretty much just around town. Worst case towing is picking up one of my dads friends projects, but if I don't do those its no big deal. I did them for a free weekend road trip, and a few bucks in my pocket.

I am not talking about a travel trailer either since I don't ever see myself buying one. Unless I was retired, and lived in it cruising the country.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 05:09 PM   #8
Greg58
Registered User
 
Greg58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Valley, NE.
Posts: 995
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziegelsteinfaust View Post
I have spent about 30 minutes looking up tow ratings, and can only find C20 Suburban ratings. Which is 7500 I think as I already forgot. Luckily I don't tow to much, but I do have to do it once in awhile.

So it must be really low. Off chance does anyone know the C10 Suburban tow capacity?

If I buy one I will shoot for a 3/4 ton, and or convert a 1/2 ton if need be.
3/4 ton Subs are out there, I'll bet less than 10% of what is available. They do bring a little more $$ than 1/2 tons.
My 87 Sub 2500 came out of New Mexico and TX. Belonged to a drag racer that pulled race cars around the SW.
454 and t-400, it loves gas but sure can pull!
Greg
__________________
________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande, 2500 133" wb, 402, 4spd.
2007 GMC 3500 SRW 4x4, Crew cab, Duramax/Allison. (Sold}
1987 Chevy Suburban 2500, Silverado, 2wd, 454, t-400
2023 Chevy Silverado LT 3500, crew cab, longbox, 4x4 Z-71 Duramax.
Greg58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 05:22 PM   #9
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,558
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

In my area most 3/4 tons seem to be 4x4 or diesel.

I need a 2wd so I can lower it so my mom can get in. She is short, and 80.

Then diesels are expensive or trashed typically.

Luckily Suburbans use the same frames so a conversion would be easy enough, and have the strength.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 06:58 PM   #10
1976gmc20
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,696
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Step stool ?????
__________________
Current/past Chevy/GMC trucks:
1958 Chevy C-60; 1965 GMC C-50; 1965 Chevy C-10; 1971 Chevy K-10; 1973 Chevy K-20; 1976 GMC C-20; 1977 Chevy C-10 Suburban; 1980 Chevy K-10; 1989 Chevy K1500; 1991 GMC V1500 Suburban; 2016 Chevy K2500 HD

Other vehicles: 1988 Jeep XJ; 2011 Toyota 4Runner
1976gmc20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 10:07 PM   #11
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,558
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1976gmc20 View Post
Step stool ?????
I have shown her a guy who makes his mother do that to get into his lifted 4x4 truck. It looked like a 4 foot ladder.

She said no. The your written out of the will type of no.

So I will not tempt it. As she hated my silverado enough before I lowered it 2/4, and that was 2 years ago. I had toyed with the idea of air bagging the truck, but decided against it for various reasons. Recently she mentioned I should do it for her since her legs are getting weaker.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2020, 02:45 PM   #12
LT7A
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PNW
Posts: 3,498
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Sounds like a cool plan, and good job getting out in front of your financial expectations. I grew up riding around in half ton suburbans and we towed an airstream, but I don't have any real way to judge since I was too young to drive. I have a trailering special c20 suburban myself. Bought as a parts rig with a 454, th400, 14 bolt. But ended up with a travel trailer that wants to be pulled by this thing, haha. Another case of a parts truck turning into a project for me. Anyway, I hope you'll do a build thread because I would like to follow along.
LT7A is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2020, 11:27 AM   #13
GRADYS Performance
Registered User
 
GRADYS Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Columbus, Oh
Posts: 366
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

For what you want to do buy a nice C10 Suburban and enjoy the ride when you have a passenger. I have a 1985 C20 Suburbans Silverado, For towing it is great but not needed for a daily driver. You have brakes on your trailer for that load when you tow the 7500#. Just make sure they work properly.
GRADYS Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2020, 04:11 PM   #14
THI
Active Member
 
THI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 169
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

If you are going to use it like a car, the C10 will be fine. If you use it like a truck, go with a C20. I currently have two 1978 trucks, a C20 Camper Special (Chevy) with the one-ton springs and brakes - the longer 56" rear spring makes it ride decently even though the springs are rated at 3,500# each. I also have a 1978 GMC K25 with the 52" rear spring rated at 2,700# each and it rides stiffer then the heavier longer spring on the Camper Specials. I have owned three square body Suburbans, a '79 C20 Trailering Special, '88 K20 and a '90 C1500 - they all had 56" rear springs and rode nicely, but springs used on the 3/4-tons were much better when loaded or a trailer hooked up.
THI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2020, 04:33 PM   #15
kipps
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: North-central Virginia
Posts: 1,099
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziegelsteinfaust View Post
Luckily Suburbans use the same frames so a conversion would be easy enough, and have the strength.
It should be easy enough to find someone who'd trade front axle components with you. I know of two guys here in Virginia who'd be quite happy to put a k20 front end under their c20's.
__________________
1987 C6P V20 truck, 2010 LMG 5.3, AFM delete, 2010 Camaro exhaust manifolds, 1997 nv4500, 1991 np241c, hydroboost, 2005 14bff axle & driveshaft, drop-n-lock gooseneck, 4.10 gears, stock suspension, rims, and tires. Still a work in progress. Any questions or suggestions are welcome!
kipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2020, 06:11 PM   #16
Corts60
Just here to tinker
 
Corts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,672
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

FYI, a lot of C10 trucks and burbs were ordered with the "Trailering special" package which usually gave it the bigger brakes and transmission cooler from the factory. My 78 C10 had the big brakes and my 86 c10 burb also has the bigger brakes installed. Although I never pull anything over 2000 lbs, I have had no issues with stopping.
Corts60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2020, 08:43 AM   #17
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 46,608
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

On a side note as a friend of mine found out, don't exceed the vehicles stated loadi/towing capacity. Even if you upgrade stuff, the sticker on the vehicle is what the police use. Its a pretty healthy ticket for overloading as my friend found out. (C10 burb pulling another his off road racing setup.
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2020, 01:44 PM   #18
kipps
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: North-central Virginia
Posts: 1,099
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palf70Step View Post
On a side note as a friend of mine found out, don't exceed the vehicles stated loadi/towing capacity. Even if you upgrade stuff, the sticker on the vehicle is what the police use. Its a pretty healthy ticket for overloading as my friend found out. (C10 burb pulling another his off road racing setup.
What numbers would law enforcement go by? I'm working with the truck in my signature, which has a 8600 gvwr. As far as I know, that number is only referring to the truck itself, and not the trailer. The combined weight is not written anywhere on the truck. Does a police officer go searching for 35 year old literature to find trailer ratings for a given truck?

Edit to add: I can't even find the trailer ratings for these trucks. Are they published anywhere?
__________________
1987 C6P V20 truck, 2010 LMG 5.3, AFM delete, 2010 Camaro exhaust manifolds, 1997 nv4500, 1991 np241c, hydroboost, 2005 14bff axle & driveshaft, drop-n-lock gooseneck, 4.10 gears, stock suspension, rims, and tires. Still a work in progress. Any questions or suggestions are welcome!

Last edited by kipps; 12-13-2020 at 01:56 PM.
kipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2020, 07:02 PM   #19
1976gmc20
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,696
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

They didn't specify CGVWR back in those days.

Trailer ratings were only in the brochures and were very conservative, IMO. I think my 1973 K20 was only rated for about 4K# trailer weight for some reason (?). I had combined weight of about 14K# all the way to Alaska and it wasn't any problem except I should have had 10 ply tires.

A C20 will always be better than a C10 for towing but if you lower it you will have negated any factory tow ratings to begin with
__________________
Current/past Chevy/GMC trucks:
1958 Chevy C-60; 1965 GMC C-50; 1965 Chevy C-10; 1971 Chevy K-10; 1973 Chevy K-20; 1976 GMC C-20; 1977 Chevy C-10 Suburban; 1980 Chevy K-10; 1989 Chevy K1500; 1991 GMC V1500 Suburban; 2016 Chevy K2500 HD

Other vehicles: 1988 Jeep XJ; 2011 Toyota 4Runner
1976gmc20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 11:26 AM   #20
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,907
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1976gmc20 View Post
They didn't specify CGVWR back in those days.

Trailer ratings were only in the brochures and were very conservative, IMO. I think my 1973 K20 was only rated for about 4K# trailer weight for some reason (?). I had combined weight of about 14K# all the way to Alaska and it wasn't any problem except I should have had 10 ply tires.

A C20 will always be better than a C10 for towing but if you lower it you will have negated any factory tow ratings to begin with
It will depend on how it's lowered.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 01:06 PM   #21
1976gmc20
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,696
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
It will depend on how it's lowered.
GM won't care after all these years, but any modifications like that would void the warranty or any sort of capacity ratings.

No clue what your glorious boys and girls of the CHP would say about it. Or your insurance company for that matter.
__________________
Current/past Chevy/GMC trucks:
1958 Chevy C-60; 1965 GMC C-50; 1965 Chevy C-10; 1971 Chevy K-10; 1973 Chevy K-20; 1976 GMC C-20; 1977 Chevy C-10 Suburban; 1980 Chevy K-10; 1989 Chevy K1500; 1991 GMC V1500 Suburban; 2016 Chevy K2500 HD

Other vehicles: 1988 Jeep XJ; 2011 Toyota 4Runner
1976gmc20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 01:37 PM   #22
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,907
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1976gmc20 View Post
GM won't care after all these years, but any modifications like that would void the warranty or any sort of capacity ratings.

No clue what your glorious boys and girls of the CHP would say about it. Or your insurance company for that matter.
I didn't see anywhere warranty was mentioned as a concern, only that of capacity. My point was a truck can be lowered w/o impacting the parts that were installed for said capacity.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 04:17 PM   #23
1976gmc20
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,696
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
I didn't see anywhere warranty was mentioned as a concern, only that of capacity. My point was a truck can be lowered w/o impacting the parts that were installed for said capacity.
Well, earlier there was some mention of a C10 not technically being rated for some of the loads that Z might tow, and law enforcement getting involved in that. So it's conceivable that some LEO might not think a modified vehicle is fit for towing some loads, despite the owner's assurance that it was all done right.

In MT you can get away with most anything as long as it's not grossly unreasonable, but I dunno about Commiefornia ....
__________________
Current/past Chevy/GMC trucks:
1958 Chevy C-60; 1965 GMC C-50; 1965 Chevy C-10; 1971 Chevy K-10; 1973 Chevy K-20; 1976 GMC C-20; 1977 Chevy C-10 Suburban; 1980 Chevy K-10; 1989 Chevy K1500; 1991 GMC V1500 Suburban; 2016 Chevy K2500 HD

Other vehicles: 1988 Jeep XJ; 2011 Toyota 4Runner
1976gmc20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 09:59 PM   #24
Nodnarb76
Registered User
 
Nodnarb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 501
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

I have an 87 2wd 3/4 ton burb. One thing I have found out is sometimes it is more difficult finding aftermarket parts for it. I have been thinking of lowering it for a few years now. I can find front coils, and a couple of places have lower spindles. I have yet to find someone who makes a C notch kit for a 3/4 ton burb.
__________________


1987 R20 Suburban LQ4/4L80e swap: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=693824
Nodnarb76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 11:36 PM   #25
kipps
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: North-central Virginia
Posts: 1,099
Re: C10 vs C20 Suburban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodnarb76 View Post
I have an 87 2wd 3/4 ton burb. One thing I have found out is sometimes it is more difficult finding aftermarket parts for it. I have been thinking of lowering it for a few years now. I can find front coils, and a couple of places have lower spindles. I have yet to find someone who makes a C notch kit for a 3/4 ton burb.
The pickup 1/2-ton and 3/4-ton frames are the same, except for the thickness of the metal. Supposedly the same C-notch components would work equally well for either one, unless the metal thickness throws the measurements off.

I don't know if this 1/2 to 3/4 similarity applies to the Suburbans or not.
__________________
1987 C6P V20 truck, 2010 LMG 5.3, AFM delete, 2010 Camaro exhaust manifolds, 1997 nv4500, 1991 np241c, hydroboost, 2005 14bff axle & driveshaft, drop-n-lock gooseneck, 4.10 gears, stock suspension, rims, and tires. Still a work in progress. Any questions or suggestions are welcome!
kipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com