The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2010, 05:29 PM   #1
cppursell
Registered User
 
cppursell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 144
283 heads on 350

I have a '67 1/2 ton chevy truck with a 70's 350 engine, with #3973487 heads (they match letter "K" on this guide: http://fastnuf.com/Headguide.html). I love it, but I hate the mileage: 11 mpg. My goal is to get better fuel economy. My cousin Jim has experimented with several small block engines and says we can put heads from a 283 engine onto mine. He has successfully done so on a 350 of his, and has been driving fine with no pinging. He reports a compression of 11:1. My cousin also has a 307 in one of his trucks with 283 heads, resulting in a 10:1 compression; according to him, that truck gets a minimum of 15 mpg. (those heads match letter "B" on above guide).

Would installing 283 heads onto my 350 be a good idea? What other tips do you have for me to maximize my fuel economy? Thanks for your advice!

P.S. Other info that might be handy: Turbo 350 Transmission, 3.54 posi rear, engine timing is set at 7.
cppursell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 05:44 PM   #2
'72customdeluxe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tejas
Posts: 691
Re: 283 heads on 350

having 7 degrees initial timing can't be helping your cause. Bump it up to atleast 12
__________________
'72 cheyenne super step, '05 long bed gmc
'72customdeluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 05:46 PM   #3
cppursell
Registered User
 
cppursell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 144
Re: 283 heads on 350

up to 12? Okay, I'll give it a try. I had it set there 'cause an old mechanic buddy of mine said to set it between 6 and 8.
cppursell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 06:03 PM   #4
mclairmo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Take Off
Posts: 1,908
Re: 283 heads on 350

2 barrel carb, HEI, vacuum advance, taller tires, taller gears (numerically lower), lose weight.
mclairmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 06:04 PM   #5
'72customdeluxe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tejas
Posts: 691
Re: 283 heads on 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by cppursell View Post
up to 12? Okay, I'll give it a try. I had it set there 'cause an old mechanic buddy of mine said to set it between 6 and 8.
the gm timing settings were for emissions purposes I believe. That's not anywhere near ideal
__________________
'72 cheyenne super step, '05 long bed gmc
'72customdeluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 08:18 PM   #6
Dingfodgy
Lemme show you something!!
 
Dingfodgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St.Helens, OR.
Posts: 876
Re: 283 heads on 350

Besides what others have said-with the 3.54 diff, I would seriously consider swapping over to a 700-R4 or 200-4r overdrive transmission. This will drop your highway RPM's about 30%. Converting to EFI would get you some gains, but can be cost prohibitive.
__________________
'67 CST-10 LWB ("Crusty") SOLD
'67 GMC SWB ("Murdock")
2000 K1500 Suburban ("Betty")
'95 BMW 325i ("Joy")
Dingfodgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 11:34 PM   #7
cppursell
Registered User
 
cppursell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 144
Re: 283 heads on 350

Okay, some good advice. However I'm not ready to change gears or transmissions, and my tires are newer. I don't have money to change to fuel injection.

What about my head swap idea?
cppursell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 07:59 AM   #8
gkesseru
Registered User
 
gkesseru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California, Maryland
Posts: 544
Re: 283 heads on 350

I still remember from a college thermodynamics course (40 years ago) that in an ideal engine, efficiency is a direct ratio of compression. This seems to say that MPG would go up with compression ratio increase. It would be interesting to hear real world feedback from you grizzly old guys whether this actually happens.
__________________
72 Fleet (died)
78 Step (sold)
55 Step named Fred (sold)
00 F150
68 Step (named El Scorcho by PO)
Build thread for the new El Scorcho http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=392932
gkesseru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 08:13 AM   #9
C-10 simplex
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: indisclosed
Posts: 1,515
Re: 283 heads on 350

i'm eager to hear this as well as i have been thinking of this very concept lately---raising compression to increase mpg.

1) Do you already have the 283 heads? If not, to confuse the issue further consider the L98 corvette heads; Being that they are 58cc's (i think?), this would also help to raise compression in addition to also being aluminum--less weight which is probably the best way to get better mpg. Still sold as new at GMPP i believe.


2) i have shyed away from the higher compression route for a while now mainly due to concerns about durabilty/longevity compared to a lower compression engine.
However, after more thinking which do you think would last longer?

a) a higher compression 350 w/ say 10:1 that was driven "normally," spending most of it's time from 2500rpm and below..

b) a lower compression 350, say a crate 350 which has about 8:1 to 8.5:1 or even an engine w/ lower compression---say 7.5:1 which has the pee run out of it and frequently raced at stoplights/track at upwards of 4500-5000+ rpm frequently?

i say "a" would last longer due to my belief that high rpm is far more stressful to an engine than higher cylinder pressure.
C-10 simplex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 09:20 AM   #10
junkyardjohn
Registered User
 
junkyardjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SOMERSET KY.
Posts: 6,427
Re: 283 heads on 350

I'VE BEEN DRIVING & WORKING ON THESE OLD TRUCKS SINCE 1985. I'VE HAD INLINES, SMALL BLOCKS & BIG BLOCKS, 4 SPEEDS, 3 ON THE TREES & AUTO-MATICS. MY GAS MILLIAGE VARIED FROM 8 TO 12 MPG. HIGHER COMPRESSION MOTORS REQUIRE HIGHER OCTAIN FUEL TO RUN. IF YOU GET OVER 10 1/2 - 1 COMPRESSION YOU EITHER HAVE TO MIX YOUR OWN FUEL OR RUN RACING GAS OR AVIATION FUEL. (& I HAVE) IT GETS KINDA EXPENSIVE. NO ONE EVER UNDER ESTIMATES THEIR MILLIAGE OR HORSEPOWER. DON'T FORGET.. YOUR TRYING TO PUSH A BRICK SHAPED, 4000 POUND VEHICAL DOWN THE HI-WAY AT 70 MPH. I'LL PROBABLY GET SLAMMED FOR THIS AS SEVERAL PEOPLE CLAIM TO GET 18 20 OR EVEN 23MPG ON A SOMEWHAT STOCK SETUP. I CALL B.S. & FIGURE THESE PEOPLE WERE JUST NOT VERY GOOD AT MATH. IF YOU ABSOLUTELY NEED GAS MILLIAGE.. BUY A VOLKSWAGEN DIESEL. I HERE THEY GET 50 MPGs.
__________________
junkyardjohn
69 1 TON TOW TRUCK //
84 4WD CUCV BLAZER// 85 1 TON 4WD STAKE TRUCK// 86 M1031 5/4 TON 4WD CUCV// ALOT OF OLD TRUCKS FOR ONE OLD MAN TO DRIVE. THERES ROOM FOR ALL OF GODS CREATURES RIGHT NEXT TO MY MASHED POTATOES//
LIFE MEMBER OF P.E.T.A (PEOPLE EATING TASTY ANIMALS)

DON'T RENT U-HAUL

ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH
IT WILL AMAZE PART OF THE PEOPLE & ASTONISH THE REST
junkyardjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 10:57 AM   #11
71meangreenc10
Its a Truck Thing......
 
71meangreenc10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Posts: 3,158
Re: 283 heads on 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by junkyardjohn View Post
SEVERAL PEOPLE CLAIM TO GET 18 20 OR EVEN 23MPG ON A SOMEWHAT STOCK SETUP. I CALL B.S. & FIGURE THESE PEOPLE WERE JUST NOT VERY GOOD AT MATH. IF YOU ABSOLUTELY NEED GAS MILLIAGE.. BUY A VOLKSWAGEN DIESEL. I HERE THEY GET 50 MPGs.
Have to agree with that statement.......


Smitty
__________________
71 C10 283/3SPD Full Resto
71 GMC 1500 Sierra Grande http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=518599
70 C10 Suburban Former military GSA truck.
72 Chevy Blazer 4X4, Sloppy Jo, Mountain Climber. Wife says no more trucks. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=707378
72 GMC 1 Ton Motor Home, wife said no more trucks until she saw this one. Gen 3 6.0/4L80E 4.10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=761110
68 GMC Suburban was 3/4 ton, now 1/2.Wife shook her head
71 C30 Wrecker
71 C20 Scott-Bilt As weird as it gets..BB Cheyenne AC Truck
68 GMC Long Stepside. They keep following me home
71 C20 Longhorn/Ole Yellor
69 C30 Former Motor Home, Flat Bed time
71meangreenc10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 11:15 AM   #12
'72customdeluxe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tejas
Posts: 691
Re: 283 heads on 350

Instead of experimenting and tearing it doWn just play with the timing. For around $180 you can get a wideband o2 sensor kit which will let you know your exact air/fuel ratios and what you need to do to tune.
__________________
'72 cheyenne super step, '05 long bed gmc
'72customdeluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 12:20 PM   #13
Duncan and son
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 1,049
Re: 283 heads on 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71meangreenc10 View Post
Have to agree with that statement.......


Smitty
x3
__________________
You can shear a sheep every year, but you can only skin it once
The person dealing with facts is never at the mercy of the person dealing with theory
1972 Cheyenne Super 402 400 A/c bucket seat tilt custom camper Longhorn
1975 Silverado 454 Crew cab camper special dually
Duncan and son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 01:04 PM   #14
klownkar
Junior Member
 
klownkar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: southern az
Posts: 35
Re: 283 heads on 350

the 350 in my 70 chevy with a performer cam and manifold, and a 600 carter afb with a manual choke got right at 15 mpg consistently on the highway. It was bored .030 over and had mild compression. I think that that is about as good as you will bet unless you go with a 700-r4. I have to agree with junkyard, anybody claiming more than that with a carb is blowing smoke and doesn't know the math.
__________________
70 chev c-10 long bed (prepping for second go round and short bed)
klownkar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 05:19 PM   #15
cppursell
Registered User
 
cppursell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 144
Re: 283 heads on 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by '72customdeluxe View Post
Instead of experimenting and tearing it doWn just play with the timing. For around $180 you can get a wideband o2 sensor kit which will let you know your exact air/fuel ratios and what you need to do to tune.
I think I can start by improving my timing. I've only set the initial timing, but I think I'll follow this tutorial to get my engine tuned better: http://outintheshop.com/faq/Lars%20timing%20.pdf

As for replacing the heads, I'm still considering it 'cause of my cousin's 350 which runs, and without pinging, on regular fuel. I won't get to the project until July if I decide to give it a try.
cppursell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 07:43 PM   #16
El Jay
Gone to greener pastures
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gateway to the Delta
Posts: 7,354
Re: 283 heads on 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by junkyardjohn View Post
SEVERAL PEOPLE CLAIM TO GET 18 20 OR EVEN 23MPG ON A SOMEWHAT STOCK SETUP. I CALL B.S. & FIGURE THESE PEOPLE WERE JUST NOT VERY GOOD AT MATH. IF YOU ABSOLUTELY NEED GAS MILLIAGE.. BUY A VOLKSWAGEN DIESEL. I HERE THEY GET 50 MPGs.
Have to agree with that statement.......


Smitty
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan and son View Post
x3
Make it x4.

I have gotten into the 14 mpg range with my Chevy (350/350, 4.11s, & corrected speedo); but that was on a long trip, all highway driving; driving with the tach never breaking the 3K mark, & never opening the secondaries.
I was driving for "economy" (if you can do such a thing in 1 of these trucks).
__________________
'69 Chevy 1/2 T LWB Stepper: Daily Beater
'72 GMC 3/4 T Fleet: Another Daily Beater
'72 Plymouth Gran Coupe: ?


"Ah women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent." Friedrich Nietzsche

"Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day." Harry S. Truman

GUN CONTROL: Never having to say, "I missed you."

Always fire two warning shots into your attacker's chest area before putting a bullet between his eyes. Paraphrased from Louis Awerbuck

Last edited by El Jay; 05-18-2010 at 07:44 PM.
El Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 07:55 PM   #17
panhandler62
Java Mechanic
 
panhandler62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 6,764
Re: 283 heads on 350

I used to have a 72 Camaro with a 350. When I got it it was set up with large chambered angle plug heads and a 2bbl carb. It got around 17mpg.

I swapped the manifold for a Torker II & a 600 cfm Holley. It got aroung 15mpg.

I cracked one of the stock heads and put on a pair of small chambered 283 heads. It got around 15mpg.

I swapped the 283 heads for a pair of camel humps with 2.05/1.94 valves and mild pocket porting and lost the 600cfm for an all mechanical 780cfm Holley and added a set of Hookers -- it got around 13mpg but ran like a bat out of hades.

Bottom line is I never got back to the milage it was getting when I bought it stock.
__________________
Keith
11 Lincoln MKT -- Momma's wagon
13 G37xS -- middle age crazy car
68 C20 Fleetside -- RIP
Decorating the whole town up at a cost of $27 ....
panhandler62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 10:56 PM   #18
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
Re: 283 heads on 350

fuel economy is a direct descendant of volumetric efficiency (VE).

VE is achieved many ways but it all comes down to better flow in and out while getting the most use of the air-fuel mix (AF) while in the cylinder.
granted you buddy may have gotten better MPG with the 283 heads and no pinging but you need to look at the whole picture. what cam/lifter set did he have? some will bleed off compression at lower speeds. I had a NICE 355 in an 80 K20 with a crower 00210 cam which bled off the static 11:1 until it hit about 2300. along with a grocery list of other one-off parts and TONS of tuning it netted 17 MPG @ 70 MPH.

IMHO the best way to increase VE is with forced induction (blower etc.).
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 11:46 PM   #19
kgt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 147
Re: 283 heads on 350

beating a dead horse by tring to some mpgs ouuta these trucks....heads will make no difference in mpgs not near enough to warrant the cost, buy a small car and enjoy the truck for sunny days,,

Last edited by kgt; 05-18-2010 at 11:47 PM.
kgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 04:02 PM   #20
cppursell
Registered User
 
cppursell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 144
Re: 283 heads on 350

It seems installing a 200r4 would be a good option in the future, but a higher priority right now is a paint job .
I just set my timing by following the tutorial I mentioned above, and my new "curb idle spec" is 18! That's a lot more than 7... I will road test it soon, but I look forward to seeing what kind of mileage difference I will get from that adjustment.

I might still experiment with the 283 heads in the later summer, but for now, are there any other enhancements/upgrades that I can use on my engine to get more performance/economy? panhandler62 mentions using special spark plugs, and '72customdeluxe mentions an 02 sensor kit, is that really worth the money for tuning the engine better?
cppursell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 04:26 PM   #21
cppursell
Registered User
 
cppursell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 144
Re: 283 heads on 350

One note: Which is easier to swap with my T350 transmission, the 700R4 or the 200R4?

Last edited by cppursell; 05-19-2010 at 04:26 PM.
cppursell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 05:23 PM   #22
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
Re: 283 heads on 350

if your TH350 is the 9" version then a 700R4 will swap nicely except for having to move the crossmember about 1 1/4"

there are 3 different 350 tailshaft housings. 6", 9", and 12".
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 06:20 PM   #23
panhandler62
Java Mechanic
 
panhandler62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 6,764
Re: 283 heads on 350

Not special plugs... It came with heads like these:



No real performance or milaege difference, just a different look. Tune her up properly and don't expect technology to beat physics. It takes a lot of power to move a 2 ton shoe box.

I have heard of trucks with modern engines and 4 or 5 speed modern transmissions getting very high teens reliably, but that's so much money that you should look at the improved milage as a side benefit because you'll never recoup that cost in saved gas.
__________________
Keith
11 Lincoln MKT -- Momma's wagon
13 G37xS -- middle age crazy car
68 C20 Fleetside -- RIP
Decorating the whole town up at a cost of $27 ....

Last edited by panhandler62; 05-19-2010 at 06:20 PM.
panhandler62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 10:26 PM   #24
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
Re: 283 heads on 350

Tune her up properly and don't expect technology to beat physics.
very nicely put.

BTW, how dare you post a pic of a 460 furd here?! especially one with fuel injection! LOL
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 05:12 AM   #25
cppursell
Registered User
 
cppursell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 144
Re: 283 heads on 350

My engine seems to be running smoother after tuning it, except when I was road testing it, when I was accelerating on the freeway it makes a sort of higher pitched rattling noise, only in 3rd gear with the secondary barrels engaged. Any idea on what that is? I'll check tomorrow if retarding the timing a bit helps with that.

Thanks for everyone's advice so far. Yes, I realize these trucks are heavy boxes, but I love them so much! I wish I had a vaporizer carburetor and that gas at the pump would vaporize, then I'd be getting 100mpg everyday!!
cppursell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
283, 350, chevy, engine, heads

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com