|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-28-2024, 12:07 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lilburn, Georgia
Posts: 47
|
Rear suspension compatibility
Hey all. I have a 67 C10 I’ve been, very slowly, working on. I have a chance at a pretty decent 65. I know the 65 is also a trailing arm suspension but I’ve got all of mine on the 67 in nice condition. Stripped and painted, new bushings, lowering springs, blocks, adjustable panhard bar, shock relocation, etc. Will all that bolt in to the 65? TIA!
|
|
|
|
02-28-2024, 01:35 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Williamsburg, Ohio
Posts: 1,764
|
Re: Rear suspension compatibility
Well, I have a 67 and just got done working on a 66. I say yes on using rear and front from a 67 on a 65 with no problems. 71 and 72s have some differences in front but besides being 5 on 5, the rears should work also unless a GMC.
__________________
1942 Chevy 1/2 ton Rod, 1959 GMC 1/2 ton Fleet Stepside, 1967 Chevy SWB K10, 1985 Corvette Coupe 4+3, 2015 Chevy Duramax reg cab 4WD W/T Last edited by dennislbrooks; 02-28-2024 at 01:36 PM. Reason: words |
|
|
|
|
02-28-2024, 04:13 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lilburn, Georgia
Posts: 47
|
Re: Rear suspension compatibility
That’s what I thought. Thanks for the verification. Greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2024, 05:24 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
|
Re: Rear suspension compatibility
While they're the same basic layout, there were subtle differences.
The Panhard bar attaches in different locations @ the frame & on the rear-end housings between the two models so there can be differences/variances there. Lower shock brackets were shaped differently but share the same footprint.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
|
03-03-2024, 05:41 PM
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lilburn, Georgia
Posts: 47
|
Re: Rear suspension compatibility
Thanks SCOTI. I appreciate your help!
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
