The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2014, 06:30 PM   #1
Billett
Registered User
 
Billett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 1,502
Oil-less turbos

Thought this might get more responses here than in the LS swap section. Anyone have any experience with these?

http://compturbo.com/spotlights/oil-less

http://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-ind...mount-e85.html


I'm running a mostly stock LQ4 at the moment trying to get all the kinks worked out before I move to Forced Induction. I really like my DT swap headers, but they're just too big for the engine. I picked up the 1-7/8" primaries before I knew better and I had intended to keep them and run the comp turbo remotely but I may just sell them to help offset the cost of converting to turbo and run one (or two!) of these suckers in the engine bay.

According to a 2-year old thread an appropriate sized unit for a 6.0 costs about $2000.

http://www.performancetrucks.net/for...-mount-496557/


Thoughts?
__________________
Will
1968 C10 - Project Texa Go 6.0/4L80e
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2002 Ford Excursion 7.3L
2024 Toyota Sienna
Billett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 10:14 PM   #2
slowtruck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cabot AR.
Posts: 126
Re: Oil-less turbos

If you are going to put them in the engine bay, why run them? You could get a s475 or s480 and be less than half the cost and running oil lines isn't that bad. But as a rear mount I'm sure they would life a lot better than running oil lines and a return pump.
slowtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 02:55 PM   #3
Billett
Registered User
 
Billett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 1,502
Re: Oil-less turbos

Very true, I suppose I was just wondering if anyone had used them at all. The are supposed to spool significantly faster than standard style turbos. I realize that generally speaking if you match your turbo to your setup then you shouldn't have any significant lag anyway but I've only done research on these, no actual experience so I was wondering if they really were noticeably better in any way.
__________________
Will
1968 C10 - Project Texa Go 6.0/4L80e
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2002 Ford Excursion 7.3L
2024 Toyota Sienna
Billett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 10:15 PM   #4
slowtruck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cabot AR.
Posts: 126
Re: Oil-less turbos

Sorry! No I haven't used them, I've only used a gt42 Garrett and a s91 Borg Warner turbo.
slowtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2014, 01:07 AM   #5
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: Oil-less turbos

Aside from the ability to run them remotely, you gain the benefit of not worrying about oil drain. You can mount the turbo at ack-basswards angles and still have "complete" lubrication.

FWIW, on something like a road course car I could really see them being cool. Lets say your running a regular oil system in something like an fbody, without running the dry sump or similar...and you have a high front mount or twins. You take a corner at full tilt, weight and oil go to the outside. You take that corner a couple quarts low because of blowby, and all of a sudden your starving the high -side in a corner. Being able to wacky-mount your turbo and not stress oil drain or feed lines is a potentially huge plus in some applications. (I just noticed that they did one vertically on a snowmobile...which was cool as hell)

I've also heard good things about their efficiency, and the centers are billet so they weigh less than other large frame turbos. You still need a water line, but its orientation doesn't matter like the oil line usually does.

Cost wise, there is a big big difference when you get into the sizes you'd be looking at for a 346 or larger.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 09:07 AM   #6
Wasted Income
Boosted Member
 
Wasted Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mackinaw, IL
Posts: 2,200
Re: Oil-less turbos

Quote:
Originally Posted by slowtruck View Post
If you are going to put them in the engine bay, why run them? You could get a s475 or s480 and be less than half the cost and running oil lines isn't that bad.
I'm with this guy...
__________________
1972 2wd K/5 Blazer Turbocharged 370 LSx - 941 rwhp / 1093 rwtq
1969 Chevy K-10 L33 5.3 / 4L80E / NP241 / 4" lift
1964 Buick Skylark Twin TURBO 383 LS pro-touring project
2014 VW Passat TDI - Daily Driver
Turbo diesel
2015 Sierra Denali HD Duramax Turbo diesel
2016 Ford Explorer Sport - Twin Turbskis
2017 Polaris RZR Turbo
2014 Nor-Tech Center Console - Twin Supercharged Outboards

TURBO ALL THE THINGS!!
Wasted Income is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 10:54 AM   #7
Gumby
Registered User
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NW-Ohio
Posts: 2,525
Re: Oil-less turbos

read it all before ya go off on me..............

Im in that mix or battle, I can really only afford to go the cheap turbo kit route on my Firebird, but the place and location Im going to put it is limited. [ as I refuse to fill my engine compartment with piping / do the fab work or pay for it, floor and body will be notched for stockish ypipe mount it]

But then those dam oil lines and drain back,and and and.........

you can see one being done right now, same engine as mine
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/v6...review-17.html

But im not doing all that, I don't want it that bad, but I want it bad enough to find a way to do it how I want it done.

Down to a home built self contaiined oiling system for the turbo, cheap inline fuel pump [ or pumps, $15-20 each, will pump fuel for years no trouble, warm 30w oil, should make it last longer.] mini tank, mini rad cooler, no need for a filter if self contained.

plus none of that "normal" metal wear n engine gunk making its way into the turbo.

I know its not the right way, but the only way it will happen for me. Less oil-less became cheap-er....

Really, id notch the right side fender. floor and firewall and have it stick out the side [ ram air] like some crazy hotwheels car, before I did all that under hood piping fab work. [ my poor back ]

only goal is 5-7psi as Im not going super tuner, stock ECM can do 5-7, so thats my limit.

I want it , but not going all out. its my way or no way.
Gumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 03:08 PM   #8
Wasted Income
Boosted Member
 
Wasted Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mackinaw, IL
Posts: 2,200
Re: Oil-less turbos

Ok.
__________________
1972 2wd K/5 Blazer Turbocharged 370 LSx - 941 rwhp / 1093 rwtq
1969 Chevy K-10 L33 5.3 / 4L80E / NP241 / 4" lift
1964 Buick Skylark Twin TURBO 383 LS pro-touring project
2014 VW Passat TDI - Daily Driver
Turbo diesel
2015 Sierra Denali HD Duramax Turbo diesel
2016 Ford Explorer Sport - Twin Turbskis
2017 Polaris RZR Turbo
2014 Nor-Tech Center Console - Twin Supercharged Outboards

TURBO ALL THE THINGS!!
Wasted Income is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 07:02 PM   #9
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: Oil-less turbos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
read it all before ya go off on me..............

Im in that mix or battle, I can really only afford to go the cheap turbo kit route on my Firebird, but the place and location Im going to put it is limited. [ as I refuse to fill my engine compartment with piping / do the fab work or pay for it, floor and body will be notched for stockish ypipe mount it]

But then those dam oil lines and drain back,and and and.........

you can see one being done right now, same engine as mine
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/v6...review-17.html

But im not doing all that, I don't want it that bad, but I want it bad enough to find a way to do it how I want it done.

Down to a home built self contaiined oiling system for the turbo, cheap inline fuel pump [ or pumps, $15-20 each, will pump fuel for years no trouble, warm 30w oil, should make it last longer.] mini tank, mini rad cooler, no need for a filter if self contained.

plus none of that "normal" metal wear n engine gunk making its way into the turbo.

I know its not the right way, but the only way it will happen for me. Less oil-less became cheap-er....

Really, id notch the right side fender. floor and firewall and have it stick out the side [ ram air] like some crazy hotwheels car, before I did all that under hood piping fab work. [ my poor back ]

only goal is 5-7psi as Im not going super tuner, stock ECM can do 5-7, so thats my limit.

I want it , but not going all out. its my way or no way.
You sir, need a blower. Boost without having do anything.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 12:01 AM   #10
Blackpony
Registered User
 
Blackpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Aubrey, TX
Posts: 308
Re: Oil-less turbos

I have dealt with a few. both were 76 mm units, one on a jeep srt8 and the other on an ls swapped miata I helped build a custom rear mount kit for. The miata ended up making around 700rwhp through a t-56 on 15 lbs. The engine was pretty basic with mild cam, stage 1 heads, and stock everything else. Thus far both vehicles are yet to have a turbo issue. Both spool just fine and run great.
Blackpony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 08:33 PM   #11
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: Oil-less turbos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackpony View Post
I have dealt with a few. both were 76 mm units, one on a jeep srt8 and the other on an ls swapped miata I helped build a custom rear mount kit for. The miata ended up making around 700rwhp through a t-56 on 15 lbs. The engine was pretty basic with mild cam, stage 1 heads, and stock everything else. Thus far both vehicles are yet to have a turbo issue. Both spool just fine and run great.
who's stage 1 heads? 700rwhp is like 800 crank through a t-56... Thats enough power to threaten the stock block and then some. On only 15lbs that would be impressive efficiency especially though a mild cam on a worked head, or a generous dyno. No mods to ring gap, no rod bolts etc?
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com