The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2024, 01:32 PM   #1
yernkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 20
Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

I just installed the Summit power brake conversion kit (SUM-760197) on my manual drum 1968. The install went pretty smooth but I am having issues with getting everything dialed in afterwards. After bleeding, the pedal only has an inch or two of travel and it stops fine at low speeds but will not stop it over 40 mph. It feels like there should be more travel in the pedal but the rod looks like it is going in to the booster as far as it will go and nothing is binding up. Could there still be air in the lines or master cylinder? What am I missing?

I am not running a proportioning valve because Summit told me I didn't need one. I have the back brakes on the front port (closest to radiator) and front brakes on side closest to firewall, again per Summit.
yernkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 01:53 PM   #2
HO455
Post Whore
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 10,807
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Shooting from the hip here. It may be that you have a master cylinder push rod issue. This thread may help if not there's probably 25 more threads on push rod issues.

https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=498293
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban the WMB,1991 S(stink)-10 Blazer,1969 GTO, 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird. 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 02:04 PM   #3
A1971Blazer
Senior Member
 
A1971Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 2,107
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

did you check the booster push rod to MC piston clearance?
__________________
1967 C10 Step side
1968 C10 Step side
1970 Chevrolet K/5 Blazer
1972 Chevrolet K/5 Blazer
.............
A1971Blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 02:10 PM   #4
yernkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 20
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by HO455 View Post
Shooting from the hip here. It may be that you have a master cylinder push rod issue. This thread may help if not there's probably 25 more threads on push rod issues.

https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=498293
That could be. I'll start reading....
yernkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 02:14 PM   #5
yernkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 20
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by A1971Blazer View Post
did you check the booster push rod to MC piston clearance?
I did not. I just followed the instructions that came with it. I did use the long pin in the master cylinder that came with the kit.
yernkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 02:19 PM   #6
A1971Blazer
Senior Member
 
A1971Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 2,107
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by yernkie View Post
I did not. I just followed the instructions that came with it. I did use the long pin in the master cylinder that came with the kit.
That could very well be the issue...
the best way to set it is with a tool like this
you need 1/32"-1/16" clearance between the two
I made this one but you can get them about anywhere
Name:  IMG_0869.jpg
Views: 187
Size:  92.9 KB
__________________
1967 C10 Step side
1968 C10 Step side
1970 Chevrolet K/5 Blazer
1972 Chevrolet K/5 Blazer
.............
A1971Blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 04:55 PM   #7
LS short box
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 1,924
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

I don't know if I'm buying the no prop valve thing. On my projects (all disc brakes front and rear) I always run a adjustable prop valve. In regards to bleeding I'd rebleed the master. Then rebleed the brakes starting at the right rear. Bleeding I've used both a Mity Vac and a pressure bleeder. Both have worked well.
LS short box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 05:01 PM   #8
yernkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 20
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS short box View Post
I don't know if I'm buying the no prop valve thing. On my projects (all disc brakes front and rear) I always run a adjustable prop valve. In regards to bleeding I'd rebleed the master. Then rebleed the brakes starting at the right rear. Bleeding I've used both a Mity Vac and a pressure bleeder. Both have worked well.
I tried throwing the factory drum/drum proportioning valve back on and I got the same result. I am still running drums front and rear so I really shouldn't need it.
yernkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 05:54 PM   #9
geezer#99
Registered User
 
geezer#99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,515
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

The factory valve is a distribution block and not a proportioning valve. That’s why you saw no difference.
geezer#99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2024, 10:48 PM   #10
yernkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 20
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by A1971Blazer View Post
did you check the booster push rod to MC piston clearance?
I had a few minutes tonight so I pulled the master cylinder and sure enough the booster push rod in touching the master cylinder. I think when I tighten the MC nuts the rod even pushed in the MC piston in a little bit. I didn't have time to mess with it tonight but hopefully will tomorrow night. I assume the rod can be adjusted in a bit by tightening or something.

Edit: I just ordered the adjustment tool off of Amazon and it should be here tomorrow. I'll try it out over the weekend. Thanks everyone for the replies and tips.

Last edited by yernkie; 03-28-2024 at 11:25 PM.
yernkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2024, 10:22 AM   #11
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,934
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

is your truck a C10 or C20/30? The part # you posted appears to be a kit with booster and a new mc, so the correct booster-mc pushrod "should" have been included. I'm kinda surprised Summit would tell you the prop valve is unnecessary as it should also provide the electrical connection for your dash brake light that will indicate a circuit fail (i.e. not usually good business sense to advise against a safety feature - but yes your brakes should work without one - but I'd still install the one that came in the kit personally - the original block from your 68 is really only there to sense imbalance and trigger the dash light). Did Summit or the instructions state why you should hook your rear brakes to the front port? That is why I ask if your truck is a 1/2 or 3/4 ton truck - rear brakes to front port is normally a C20+ thing - but the part # you shared doesn't appear to be C10 vs C20-specific, so maybe it's based on a C20+ system, which is fine - just kinda curious.
jocko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2024, 11:36 AM   #12
yernkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 20
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by jocko View Post
is your truck a C10 or C20/30? The part # you posted appears to be a kit with booster and a new mc, so the correct booster-mc pushrod "should" have been included. I'm kinda surprised Summit would tell you the prop valve is unnecessary as it should also provide the electrical connection for your dash brake light that will indicate a circuit fail (i.e. not usually good business sense to advise against a safety feature - but yes your brakes should work without one - but I'd still install the one that came in the kit personally - the original block from your 68 is really only there to sense imbalance and trigger the dash light). Did Summit or the instructions state why you should hook your rear brakes to the front port? That is why I ask if your truck is a 1/2 or 3/4 ton truck - rear brakes to front port is normally a C20+ thing - but the part # you shared doesn't appear to be C10 vs C20-specific, so maybe it's based on a C20+ system, which is fine - just kinda curious.
It is a C10. I believe the pushrod it correct but it just needs to be adjusted (shortened). No prop valve came with the kit. I still have the old prop/distribution block that I may hook back up just to see if it makes any difference. The instructions did not say anything regarding front and back ports but the tech said to put the back to the front and front to back. My plan is to get the rod adjusted, bleed the brakes and take it for a test drive. If needed I can swap the front and backs on the MC pretty easily.
yernkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2024, 01:00 PM   #13
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,934
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Ok thanks for the additional info. Before altering the pushrod that came with the kit, which should be the correct length or Summit should replace it, I’d alter a donor rod. I’d ask the tech, if you can get hold of that same one again, why he advised to connect the rears to the front port. Front vs rear to which mc port does matter, even in an all drum system. And to my earlier statement, disregard the note about the prop valve that I thought came with the kit - since you are still drums all the way around, the original distrib block is all you should really need (and just to retain the original safety function and dash indicator aspect of it). I think I was thinking in the back of my mind that you also did a front disk conversion - that’s the only reason I could see a need for a prop valve - but even if you don’t “need” a prop valve - it doesn’t need you don’t need a distribution block. Having said that, the distribution block is unrelated to the problem you’re having.
jocko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2024, 02:47 PM   #14
yernkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 20
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by jocko View Post
Ok thanks for the additional info. Before altering the pushrod that came with the kit, which should be the correct length or Summit should replace it, I’d alter a donor rod.
The rod is adjustable so it isn't permanent.
yernkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2024, 05:40 PM   #15
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,934
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

AH! Ok, that's good news, sorry I missed that.
jocko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2024, 09:39 AM   #16
yernkie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 20
Re: Summit Power Brake Conversion Issues

The push rod adjustment solved the problem. It was a little too long and it was preloading the master cylinder. I also swapped the front and rear lines and reinstalled the distribution block after a short test drive. All is good now. Thanks again for the help.
yernkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com