The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2022, 11:47 AM   #26
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,425
Re: Holley carb question

At least least there are few, if any, personal attacks here.

10-15 years ago I spent a lot of time on the ChevyTalk.org Performance forum. However, it's just about dead now. I think that's because several folks there jumped right into name-calling when confronted with differing opinions. I mean there were raging verbal battles which the admins tolerated. Too bad, because there were a lot of really sharp guys there, too.
__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 34 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 23 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!

Last edited by MikeB; 02-27-2022 at 02:10 PM.
MikeB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2022, 01:35 PM   #27
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 46,644
Re: Holley carb question

I was just talking to someone about this on my 70. The factory quadrajest are all 750 (or 850). He mentioned that a stock or mild engine the 600 650 is more than enough, but at higher RPMs they tend to make the engine run lean. So if you are gonna hot rod it a lot, go bigger, if like mine it is a cruiser the 600 is more than enough.
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2022, 02:28 PM   #28
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,425
Re: Holley carb question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palf70Step View Post
I was just talking to someone about this on my 70. The factory quadrajest are all 750 (or 850).
The beauty of Q-jets was the small primaries, which made for much higher air velocity (and better fuel atomization) than even a 500 cfm square bore carb. So you could have the capability to flow 725-800 cfm without sacrificing throttle response.
__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 34 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 23 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!
MikeB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2022, 05:20 PM   #29
Mike_The_Grad
Senior Member
 
Mike_The_Grad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 582
Re: Holley carb question

Thank you guys for all of the responses. Some time has passed and I still have the 1850-3 although a little more tuned to my engine. Found out p.o. did a lot of tuning to this carb for his engine as well. Like capping off the fresh air vent for the electric choke so that it burned up the choke coil spring. So now its wired straight open all the time. Also installed a aftermarket power valve shield which consists of a hollow base plate screw with a check ball that acts like a vacuum signal passage for the power valve and the check ball will seal off that passage in the event of a backfire. The only thing is you have to block off the factory vacuum signal passage in the base plate with a lead slug and peen it over. Well he didnt do that, so I used a aluminum pop rivet ground down to a taper and driven in and peened over. Those two things alone cleared up about 80% of the problems I was having. I still get a weird whistle sound when I'm pedal to the metal and it's going through the power band. He also clipped the secondary diaphragm spring. So I bought a spring kit and ended up with the brown one but I think it's too stiff as I can only get the secondaries to kick in for a bout a second. So I'm gonna swap in a lighter one since I did all this other correcting of things and see how it reacts now. But over all I agree that holleys make more power than edelbrocks. I've had the truck up to where the speedo needle is about 1/8 inch away from 0 on the factory speedo. And it still had more it in. But that was fast enough for me. I'm ok with that.
__________________
1972 C/10 LWB - Mine
1964 C/10 LWB - My Dad's

Instagram: Mike_The_Grad
Mike_The_Grad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2022, 09:42 AM   #30
Ironangel
Senior Member
 
Ironangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Falls City, Nebraska "100 Miles From Nowhere"
Posts: 2,219
Re: Holley carb question

Get that wide band AFR gauge set up, take the guess work out of the equation...
__________________
Michael of the clan Hill,
"Two Seventy Two's"
71 1-ton Dually 350 4-Speed
71 C/50 Grain Truck, 350 Split-Axle 4-Speed
02 3/4 ton Express
14 Indian Chief Vintage
1952 Ford 8N, "Only Ford Allowed On The Property"
"Be American, Buy American"
Ironangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2022, 01:20 PM   #31
sloGMC
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 116
Re: Holley carb question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_The_Grad View Post
So I bought a spring kit and ended up with the brown one but I think it's too stiff as I can only get the secondaries to kick in for a bout a second. So I'm gonna swap in a lighter one since I did all this other correcting of things and see how it reacts now.
What do you mean that the secondaries “only kick in for a second”? If you are trying to watch them open by winging the throttle with the truck stationary, they probably shouldn’t be moving at all. And if you’re going to be taking the time to tune the secondaries it’s worth adding the quick change diaphragm if it hasn’t been done already. Did you read the tuning information that comes with the spring kit? And I agree with the others that have mentioned getting the O2 sensor. It makes tuning absurdly easy.
__________________
1971 Pontiac Firebird
1971 GMC C2500
sloGMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2022, 02:37 PM   #32
garyd1961
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Henderson NC
Posts: 975
Re: Holley carb question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myself View Post
That carb is too small for your engine. I've been all through the carb rat race, tried everything and learned to tune Holley carbs. I don't care what you do......your torque and power are missing from this small carb. I LOVE the Holley Street Avenger carbs for a street rod. They're just about dialed in perfect right out of the box with only minor tuning to your specific combo required. On a 383 stroker I would go with the 770 Avenger with vac secondaries, NOT a double pumper. That engine will really come alive!

570 Street Avenger on a street 305
670 on a healthy 350
770 for 383 and 400 smallblocks


Oh,.....and after you get all your power that's missing by changing carbs, you're welcome
This^ , plus as someone else said your compression is mighty high for iron heads.
garyd1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com