The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-01-2015, 03:04 PM   #1
cajun chevy
Registered User
 
cajun chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: meteghan centre, nova scotia, canada
Posts: 208
better fuel mileage

Hello out there
I have in my 1972 c10 307 v8, 4 speed, think it's a sm465, 373 gears in rear , 245/60 r 15 front tires, 275/60r15 back.
My question is what would be cheaper for better gas mileage. Changing the transmission or rear end gears. Thanks.
cajun chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 03:30 PM   #2
Swar
Registered User
 
Swar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Matamoras, PA
Posts: 397
Re: better fuel mileage

4 speed manual? You might see a difference in mpg if you put in a 5 or 6 speed. Not so much with changing the rear because it doesn't have overdrive. Taller tires might help on the highway.
Swar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 03:50 PM   #3
cajun chevy
Registered User
 
cajun chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: meteghan centre, nova scotia, canada
Posts: 208
Re: better fuel mileage

I would like to keep the tire size I have, what trans would be good, I don't plan on hard takeoffs.
cajun chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 03:55 PM   #4
67 chevelle
Registered User
 
67 chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: WEST PALM FLORIDA
Posts: 1,174
Re: better fuel mileage

rear gears would be cheaper 3.42s would work
__________________
68 Long Fleet , ly6 , turbo 350 , 3-5 drop , original paint , front discs
67 Small window , 7 foot bed , tweaked 6.0 LSX 2004R Medium Olive
58 Apache fleet , 235 , offy intake , dual exhaust , 4 on the floor , red/white
69 Long Fleet , Custom , 6.0, 4l60 , AC , Medium Olive
67 chevelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 04:03 PM   #5
Swar
Registered User
 
Swar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Matamoras, PA
Posts: 397
Re: better fuel mileage

Gears would be cheaper, but I don't think you'd see a big enough improvement to justify it.
Save up for a decent 5 speed. It's more money and more work, but that's what I'd do. 3.73s are a good ratio for a setup like that. A Tremec 5 speed would be a really nice mod for something you want to cruise down the highway in.
Swar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 05:42 PM   #6
leftybass209
Registered User
 
leftybass209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 2,186
Re: better fuel mileage

Gears are cheaper but to do it properly isn't cheap in and of itself. When a truck is far off the mark of stellar fuel mileage as ours are (no offense) there is little you can do to improve your fuel mileage to warrant the initial cost. It's going to be in the thousands to save 10 bucks per tank. Then, you'd have to hope your engine survived long enough without a rebuild to start pocketing the fuel savings.
leftybass209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 05:47 PM   #7
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: better fuel mileage

Get a geo for better mileage if thar's what u need
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 05:50 PM   #8
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Re: better fuel mileage

Swapping the entire rear end for a 3.08 rear would likely be the cheapest. I've seen them range from $100-250. Compared to a 3.73 that's a 17% reduction in gearing (but don't expect to see a 17% fuel savings!) You might get a mile or two per gallon better.

OD is the best of both worlds. You can keep your 3.73 for grunt but get a ~30% reduction in OD.
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 08:17 PM   #9
tranz am
Registered User
 
tranz am's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 586
Re: better fuel mileage

the ultimate transmission and rear end combination for mpg's has got to be a t56 and 3.73's.
__________________
My build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=456220

Best 1/4 mile time 12.1 @ 111 w/traction issues

1969 GMC SWB
1964 chevy II Nova ht
tranz am is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 11:20 PM   #10
cajun chevy
Registered User
 
cajun chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: meteghan centre, nova scotia, canada
Posts: 208
Re: better fuel mileage

Thanks guys, gas here is 5 bucks a gallon, everything helps.
cajun chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com