The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2022, 12:52 PM   #51
Accelo
Registered User
 
Accelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: washington
Posts: 2,169
Re: Valve seals

I guessed at .008 for the deck clearance. Your closer to .045 deck clearance. Then add the gasket thickness and you are closer to .085 as the quench area.

I would use the thin steel gasket on the iron heads for sure.
Quench should never be less than .035-inches.
Standard head gaskets typically have a compressed thickness around .040-inches.
If the pistons were at deck height you would have a perfect quench with a composite gasket.

"The quench" effect causes turbulence in the combustion chamber as the piston comes up to TDC. "Good" quench reduces an engines tendency to ping. Also, the space is so small in cannot support combustion, this also reduces the tendency to ping.

Roughly over .060"-.080", the quench effect stops, that area is just another part of the combustion chamber.

I think you made a good choice. If you had all the numbers your compression would likely be in the 9:1 (nominal range).

BTW Effective dome volume for your motor would be the CC of the valve dimples in the pistons. This would be a negative number. Positive only if you have a piston dome.

Likely this is just too much information. Use the thin gasket and enjoy you new motor.
Cheers.
Accelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2022, 10:00 PM   #52
68LAlonghorn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 27
Re: Valve seals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Accelo View Post
I guessed at .008 for the deck clearance. Your closer to .045 deck clearance. Then add the gasket thickness and you are closer to .085 as the quench area.

I would use the thin steel gasket on the iron heads for sure.
Quench should never be less than .035-inches.
Standard head gaskets typically have a compressed thickness around .040-inches.
If the pistons were at deck height you would have a perfect quench with a composite gasket.

"The quench" effect causes turbulence in the combustion chamber as the piston comes up to TDC. "Good" quench reduces an engines tendency to ping. Also, the space is so small in cannot support combustion, this also reduces the tendency to ping.

Roughly over .060"-.080", the quench effect stops, that area is just another part of the combustion chamber.

I think you made a good choice. If you had all the numbers your compression would likely be in the 9:1 (nominal range).

BTW Effective dome volume for your motor would be the CC of the valve dimples in the pistons. This would be a negative number. Positive only if you have a piston dome.

Likely this is just too much information. Use the thin gasket and enjoy you new motor.
Cheers.
Thanks so much for the help with this Accelo. I'm using a digital caliper to measure the deck, maybe that is not the best way to do it? I also cleaned the pistons, which cleaned super easy with just a brush and some carb cleaner. Mechanic neighbor said the engine has definitely been rebuilt and estimated it has very few miles based on the look of the pistons, chambers.
68LAlonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2022, 10:02 PM   #53
68LAlonghorn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 27
Re: Valve seals

Some pics of how the pistons look after cleaning them a bit. The intake manifold area was basically that clean, not much dirt at all.
Attached Images
    
68LAlonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2022, 01:19 AM   #54
68LAlonghorn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 27
Re: Valve seals

Well, after some additional reading I've clearly measured the deck height incorrectly. I'll keep at it and come back after learning a bit more about all this.

Thanks again to all for the help and information.
68LAlonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2022, 09:47 AM   #55
Carl Spangler
Registered User
 
Carl Spangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Coast Ca.
Posts: 417
Re: Valve seals

The 'ring ridge' and wear at the top of the cylinders might need addressing depending on how you plan on using this engine. The engine is a candidate for a re-ring/hone at the very least. JMO, based on the photos.
__________________
1971 SWB step side: Original NM Forestry and then NM Fire truck
Carl Spangler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2022, 11:34 AM   #56
Caddylackn
Registered User
 
Caddylackn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 171
Re: Valve seals

For measuring quench I would use a straight edge across the cylinder, then a feeler gauge. Measure where the corresponding flat area of the head would be. This is your quench area.

I would also use this time to find true TDC and mark your balancer accordingly with one of those aftermarket timing tape strips.
__________________
1969 Custom Camper C20; Factree Air, 350/TH400/Dana 70U with C30 wheel cylinders, Disk brakes, H4 conversion, headlight relay mod, 3G 135 amp alternator. 7500 GVW
Caddylackn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2022, 01:34 PM   #57
Accelo
Registered User
 
Accelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: washington
Posts: 2,169
Re: Valve seals

There are many methods of measuring deck clearance. Some account for piston rock and a bunch of other variables. All you need is an approximation which your calipers provided. The feeler gauge and straight edge is also a good method without investing in tools you may never need again.
The heads are ordered so you have already made your decision. Not the time to look back. Confirming the timing mark is a good idea. No tools needed. You could use the old head and set a nut on top the piston as a stop. You can look up how it's done on YouTube. Sometimes the balancers well get mixed with an incorrect pointer. Some balancers are marked TDC in line with the shaft key and others are offset. No need to worry about any ridge as I doubt you are going to change out the rings. Nor would I recommend it. You mentioned little to no ridge and the motor has obvious been rebuild as it was bored .020 over. If it have many miles on it the pistons would not have cleaned up that nicely.

My though it you have done a great job for your first time.
Accelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2022, 05:46 PM   #58
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,111
Re: Valve seals

If you're going to use the thin steel gaskets, make absolutely certain that the block is flat. Get a known good straightedge and check it all with a feeler gauge on each bank. Every single bit of crud on the deck has to be gone. Otherwise, you may develop a leak- coolant or compression, depending. The heads are new, so ostensibly flat, but I'd check them as well.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com