The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=754061)

GonicGM 12-28-2018 10:57 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Thanks for posting. Responding for watching.

AustinBelair 01-03-2019 06:11 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8413528)
There were a handful of Right Hand Drive 73-91 squarebody trucks made for UK standard roads in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, etc. There are even a few that were imported back into North America in the last 30 to 40 years.

This is why I always use LH & RH in my descriptions and not driver/passenger sides.;)

Industry standard nomenclature for Left and Right hand sides of a vehicle... you'll find these used in the service manuals.
  • LH is the seated driver's Left hand.
  • RH is the seated drivers' Right hand.


Are you positive that all six of the rubber feed and return lines on the valve are routed to the proper steel feed and return lines?

Are you positive the LH fuel pump is the one that's running and not the RH pump?
You can check this at the two position fuel sender/pump disconnect to the LH sender using a test lamp. It should light for 2 seconds or so when you turn the ignition to ON.

Yep, I get power there on the LH for 2 seconds then light goes off.

hatzie 01-03-2019 06:36 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Then it's down to the hose routing at the valve or the fuel pump itself.

If you take the bed off or at least slide it back a foot or two it's easier to work on this area than working in the dark over your head under the truck.

Don't use an impact on the bed bolts. You'll waller out the holes in the bed. If they are stuck just cut em off under the bed and replace them. Nut splitters work on the bed bolts too.

AustinBelair 01-03-2019 08:48 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8419373)
Then it's down to the hose routing at the valve or the fuel pump itself.

If you take the bed off or at least slide it back a foot or two it's easier to work on this area than working in the dark over your head under the truck.

Don't use an impact on the bed bolts. You'll waller out the holes in the bed. If they are stuck just cut em off under the bed and replace them. Nut splitters work on the bed bolts too.

Do I have to worry about tail light wiring and other stuff or just the bed bolts?

hatzie 01-03-2019 11:34 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
The taillight pigtail unplugs from the front-back lighting harness on the tail end of the LH frame rail.
If the factory lighting harness disconnect plugs aren't bodged somehow you unplug it. Not a big deal.

travlinman 01-11-2019 08:12 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quick question for u. 82 Chevy c-30, I'm eliminating the driver side tank and selector valve and will run new lines from the tank to the pump. How do I get my gauge to read correctly off the single tank? I'm assuming I'll need to bypass the dash switch in some way? What about the wiring and connector from the old valve ?

dmack91 09-26-2019 11:48 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Hatzie,

Thanks for all of the great info.

biggsteve97 09-28-2019 09:22 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
The factory dual tank harness failed completely in my 87 Silverado R10 a about 2 years ago and was wondering if anyone had or knows where to get a new dual tank harness for my truck. Mine was so bad when I removed its not worth using it to fab up another one. First lost the LH tank 10 years ago and repaired the harness multiple times through the years. About 5 years ago it started to go through pumps and senders in the RH tank about every 4-6 months and even damaged 2 fuel gauges somehow. Then one day last year it lost power in the harness to both tanks completely all the way up to the firewall. I have replaced the dash switch and the Pollack valve multiple times through the years and have managed to find Ac Delco parts every time but the truck has had a very hard life and driven almost every day since new.

hatzie 09-28-2019 10:17 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
I assume the wiring from the fuel pump relay to the Metripak disconnect on the NL2 wiring harness is OK.

If you have the whole NL2 harness it's not difficult to build a brand new one using the old harness as a layout guide. If you cut it in a couple places or it's broken in a few places just duct tape it together. You aren't trying to make it work again you're in need of a layout and wire length guide. Even if it's chewed up pretty badly it'll show where the wires need to be terminated and how long you need to make em.

I usually lay one of these small harnesses on a piece of plywood and drive in finish nails after the terminations and next to any breakout points.

The NL2 sub harness is actually in two sections.
  1. The Weatherpak and Metripak 480 firewall disconnects to the switch and ground inside the cab.
  2. Two position Weatherpak disconnect at the firewall to the Weatherpak valve plug, and the Weatherpaks at the senders.
    [**]There's a single wire from the B terminal on the six position Weatherpak at the valve to a disconnect in the fuel gauge wire on the RH frame rail. Some of the later TBI trucks used a Weatherpak at this position. If yours is a molded rubber connector and this wire is chewed up I'd replace it with a single position Weatherpak and new wire.

You can buy the 2 position Weatherpak shells, Metripak 480 shells, all three terminal families (Weatherpak, Metripak 480, & Packard 56), and the Metripak/Weatherpak wire seals from Mouser Electronics.
The connector shells inside the cab are obsolete but the terminals are easy to source.

Download the 1989 wiring diagrams and print off page 34 (PDF page 42) on 11x17 paper. The connector shell part numbers are on the diagram along with the wire gauges and colors. I'd use 14ga SXL jacketed wire. You can get project assortments in 25' lengths from the Wirebarn.
The original harness was wrapped in harness wrap. This is not electrical tape it's a special friction activated tape. I'd use Split poly loom with Tesa harness tape at the joints and maybe wrap the split poly every 6" or so with two wraps of Electrical tape to keep the split closed.
https://www.amazon.com/Tesa-Wire-Loo.../dp/B00EH6IZ6Y

There are two splices in this harness, near the six position Weatherpak on the valve, for the fuel pump power feeds. I'd solder these joints and slip adhesive lined "marine" heatshrink over the connections.

Delphi 12085270 & 12085271 ratcheting terminal crimp tools are very versatile tools. They will do every original terminal in the square-body trucks from Packard and Pak Con to Metripak and Weatherpak. They're around $100 each but these are the most used crimp tools in my wiring box outside of my Daniels AF8 & AFM8.
There are some non ratcheting crimpers that are almost as versatile but they're unpleasant to use.
I'd buy the Delphi tools and sell em when you're finished... if you decide you don't want to keep em.

Gmachinz Harnessworx makes custom and factory type harnesses. I've never done business with him so I don't know what your experience will be.

Ford Assassin 01-04-2020 04:56 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
So I am in the final stages of parts collecting of doing the LS swap on my 1988 R30. I am planning on swapping to Walbro 255 (GCA758-2) pumps in each tank. The first post mentioned the switch can only handle 65 psi of fuel pressure.

I was only planning on running a single fuel pressure regulator (01-04 Corvette, Wix 33737) in the engine bay and reusing as much of the stock TBI fuel lines as possible. This will allow the fuel switch to dictate where/which tank unused/bypassed fuel to either tank that is selected.

Anyone see a problem with doing this way?

Thanks

hatzie 01-05-2020 04:01 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
As long as you aren't exceeding the pressure capacity of the valve I don't see a problem with it.
Use high volume low pressure lift pumps in the tanks to feed one frame mounted high pressure pump.
The lift pumps will keep the high pressure pump from starving and the return pressure should be low enough that the 65PSI valve will handle it.
Several Japanese and European cars are designed that way.

Ford Assassin 01-05-2020 05:47 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8654976)
As long as you aren't exceeding the pressure capacity of the valve I don't see a problem with it.
Use high volume low pressure lift pumps in the tanks to feed one frame mounted high pressure pump.
The lift pumps will keep the high pressure pump from starving and the return pressure should be low enough that the 65PSI valve will handle it.
Several Japanese and European cars are designed that way.

I appreciate the timely response.

The inlet pressure for the valve will be stock TBI pressure, no worries there. The return pressure might be higher, but unlikely since the return should be free flow returning to the selected tank.

I figured this would work, many diesels operate this way, low pressure, high volume lift pump supply to the injector pump.

JohnnyOroz 01-05-2020 08:58 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gmachinz (Post 8173851)
Popeye...I messaged you that I offer ready to run dual tank harnesses for your exact application-let me know if you need one! Pic is for reference regarding one if many versions of the harnesses I have on hand for this setup.

Where can I find a simple plug and play set up like this?

aggie91 01-10-2020 04:08 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyOroz (Post 8655166)
Where can I find a simple plug and play set up like this?

Send a PM to gmachinz on here or look up Jabin Wood (Harnessworx) on FB. I have gotten window harnesses direct from him before and he does exceptional work.

Hart_Rod 02-26-2020 12:28 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Great thread!

Hart_Rod 02-26-2020 06:46 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
I think I have a bad pump relay. Where's the best place to purchase one?

Hart_Rod 02-27-2020 05:39 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hart_Rod (Post 8685105)
I think I have a bad pump relay. Where's the best place to purchase one?

Disregard the relay is good. Either my switch is bad OR the valve is not moving.

hatzie 02-27-2020 09:27 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hart_Rod (Post 8685338)
Disregard the relay is good. Either my switch is bad OR the valve is not moving.

For those that need one it's a very common GM 14089936 sealed relay.
The AC Delco part is cheaply made in China now so I'd check over the other usual suspects like NAPA Echlin AR279 or Standard Motor RY109... one of these may still be made somewhere outside of China or India.
GM used this for sealed control of a bunch of circuits on the 86 and later squarebodies and the 1st design GMT400 trucks.

Hart_Rod 02-27-2020 09:33 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8685373)
For those that need one it's a very common GM 14089936 sealed relay.
The AC Delco part is cheaply made in China now so I'd check over the other usual suspects like NAPA Echlin AR279 or Standard Motor RY109... one of these may still be made somewhere outside of China or India.
GM used this for sealed control of a bunch of circuits on the 86 and later squarebodies and the 1st design GMT400 trucks.

Good advice! I got one at AZ and it worked, but you could see the difference in quality between it and the original one.

Hatzie I have some more troubleshoot questions. Would you like me to PM you as not to clog up this thread or start a new thread of my own? Thanks again for all of the great information! :metal:

hatzie 02-27-2020 10:12 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Ask here if it's about the dual tank fuel systems.

Hart_Rod 02-27-2020 10:32 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
5 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8685402)
Ask here if it's about the dual tank fuel systems.

Sweet! Here's what I'm seeing: Switch in LHS, truck starts normally and gauge reads correctly. When you switch to RHS, truck keeps running, gauge reads the same. I haven't pulled the switch out to check the connections because I don't want to mess up the dash (it's a very low mileage truck). I'm trying to figure that part out without damaging anything.

kwmech 02-27-2020 11:54 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Anybody have a dimensional picture of the hole for the dash switch. If I remember correctly it is not just a square hole. It has a notch on the bottom.

hatzie 02-27-2020 01:24 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Each fuel pump gets power from the polarity reversing switch and ground from the frame.

The fuel gauge sender select switch is in the valve. There's no reason the gauge switch couldn't fail in one position or the other and the valve itself still route fuel correctly.

Try this;
  • Get some 1/2W resistors in 100Ω, 47Ω, and 22Ω. or close to those values.
  • Get some alligator clip electronics test leads.
  • Get a handful of MALE Weatherpak terminals. Wire gauge rating is not important... you're using these to make sure you don't damage the FEMALE valve plug terminals by jamming stuff in them that isn't supposed to go there.
I keep male and female Weatherpak and Metripak 150, 280, 480, & 630 terminals in my meter bag along with several other connector families so I can do test hookups without damaging sensors and wiring harnesses. U-Line sells small plastic Ziploc baggies. They're darn handy to keep these kinda test terminals separate in the meter bag. I use blue tape and a sharpie to label the oddball terminals.
  1. Unplug the six position Weatherpak tower plug from the valve.
  2. The fuel gauge should go to the 3:00 position with the ignition on.
  3. Attach the jumpers from a known good ground and a MALE Weatherpak terminal in the B terminal of the valve plug.
  4. One at a time insert the 100Ω, 47Ω, and 22Ω resistors in between two jumper leads and look at the gauge with each resistor.
    100Ω should drive the needle to just past F, 47 should drive it to somewhere around 1/2 and 22 should drive the needle below the 1/4 mark nearer 1/8.
  5. Insert two Male Weatherpak terminals with two test leads jumpering from B to A and watch the gauge with the ignition switched on. This is one of the actual senders.
  6. Insert two Male Weatherpak terminals with two test leads jumpering from B to C and watch the gauge with the ignition switched on. This is the other sender.

If the senders are both working and the tanks are at different fill levels the gauge should read different levels in 5 & 6.
If your tanks are filled to the same level then the gauge will read the same in 5 & 6.

Steps 1-4 are a sanity check to make sure the fuel gauge and the associated wiring is in proper calibration. This is a bitmap of a curve I plotted in Excel based on squarebody fuel gauge needle position vs a calibrated decade resistance box in place of a GM sender on my bench.
http://johnnynightstick.s3.amazonaws...AUGE_CURVE.jpg

Hart_Rod 02-27-2020 11:00 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
I'm pretty sure it is the valve. I guess it would make sense to upgrade to the higher pressure valve. Where is the best and quickest place to purchase one?

Hart_Rod 02-28-2020 08:39 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Hatzie - if I'm reading your post #63 correctly, if the valve isn't moving to the other tank, THEN the gauge won't read the other tank. Or said another way, the gauge doesn't start reading the "new" tank, until the valve has switched to the "new" tank. I went ahead and ordered and new 65 psi valve and it should be next week. Hopefully swapping that out will not be that difficult and will fix the problem. CHEERS!

hatzie 02-28-2020 01:59 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hart_Rod (Post 8685920)
Hatzie - if I'm reading your post #63 correctly, if the valve isn't moving to the other tank, THEN the gauge won't read the other tank. Or said another way, the gauge doesn't start reading the "new" tank, until the valve has switched to the "new" tank. I went ahead and ordered and new 65 psi valve and it should be next week. Hopefully swapping that out will not be that difficult and will fix the problem. CHEERS!

That is correct.

The TBI trucks also use the power wire from the dash switch to energize the selected fuel pump. One of the output wires is power and the other is ground and the polarity changes based on the switch position. If you select the LH tank and the valve doesn't move the RH fuel pump still shuts off and the LH fuel pump still turns on... as long as the wiring hasn't been tampered with.
The engine keeps running so I have to assume the switch and valve are changing tanks and fuel pumps. This leaves the little microswitch inside the valve that handles the gauge. If the gauge microswitch inside the valve on terminals A B & C has failed but the rest of the valve is working it would exhibit your list of symptoms.

Get a valve made by Pollack and be done with it. I believe the latest and greatest good to 65psi is Pollack 42-159P. They aren't cheap but they work for a long long long time.

Hart_Rod 03-01-2020 10:42 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Before I forget, 1987 R10 1/2 Ton, 305/700R4. OK, So I replaced the switch on the dash and I replaced the switching valve with a new 65 PSI Pollack unit. I'm going to fill up the RH tank so that I know how much fuel it should show on the gauge and then I'm going to start the troubleshooting over again.

One quick question, what is the procedure to test the pumps using the relay pigtail under the hood?

Also, when I unplug the transfer valve underneath, it was my understanding that it should park the fuel gauge at 3:00, however, it doesn't seem to affect the gauge. Thoughts?

Thanks again Hatzie for all your guidance, :metal:.

Hart_Rod 03-01-2020 11:58 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
I made sure the RH tank is full, LH tank is approximately half. Gauge shows approximately half in both LH & RH positions. I hear the pump cycle and the valve move when I turn the key on in either positions. Truck runs in both positions. Thoughts? Bad ground on the RH tank?

hatzie 03-01-2020 06:40 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Probably one of three things not in order of probability. Test first then replace or repair.
  1. The main fuel gauge sender wire from terminal B to the gauge sender terminals in the instrument panel has a resistive short to ground. It's not a dead short to ground which would drive the fuel gauge needle to E.
  2. Either power or ground connection, or both, through the instrument panel to the fuel gauge has failed.
  3. The fuel gauge itself is malfunctioning.
    3a. Connections to the bias resistor are loose.
    3b. The bias resistor has failed from vibration wearing through the power connections or a cracked ceramic substrate.
    3c. The gauge itself has failed.
You can pull the main bezel, the cluster lens, and the fuel gauge without disturbing the instrument cluster bucket. This will give you access to the power, ground, and signal connections for the fuel gauge.
Power is hot with the ignition switched ON.
Ground is Ground all the time.
The B terminal of the valve plug gives you access to the other end of the common gauge wire.

Don't overlook the plastic printed circuit. If you have higher than one ohm resistance from the sender clips to the B terminal at the valve pull the cluster bucket, being careful not to break off the tabs, and unplug the cluster connector. Then you can test resistance from the fuel gauge wire on the cluster connector to valve terminal B and test the resistance of the printed circuit sender trace with a meter as well.

Removing the nuts from the bias resistor on the back of the gauge and re-installing with star washers can fix dodgy connections to the resistor. Don't be a ham handed gorilla when you tighten them back down... you can and will crack the ceramic substrate of the resistor. Snug with a nut driver is good enough. If it looks like the resistor is cocking to one side loosen it up and get it level with the back of the gauge can.

Hart_Rod 03-03-2020 01:07 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8687522)
Probably one of three things not in order of probability. Test first then replace or repair.
  1. The main fuel gauge sender wire from terminal B to the gauge sender terminals in the instrument panel has a resistive short to ground. It's not a dead short to ground which would drive the fuel gauge needle to E.
  2. Either power or ground connection, or both, through the instrument panel to the fuel gauge has failed.
  3. The fuel gauge itself is malfunctioning.
    3a. Connections to the bias resistor are loose.
    3b. The bias resistor has failed from vibration wearing through the power connections or a cracked ceramic substrate.
    3c. The gauge itself has failed.
You can pull the main bezel, the cluster lens, and the fuel gauge without disturbing the instrument cluster bucket. This will give you access to the power, ground, and signal connections for the fuel gauge.
Power is hot with the ignition switched ON.
Ground is Ground all the time.
The B terminal of the valve plug gives you access to the other end of the common gauge wire.

Don't overlook the plastic printed circuit. If you have higher than one ohm resistance from the sender clips to the B terminal at the valve pull the cluster bucket, being careful not to break off the tabs, and unplug the cluster connector. Then you can test resistance from the fuel gauge wire on the cluster connector to valve terminal B and test the resistance of the printed circuit sender trace with a meter as well.

Removing the nuts from the bias resistor on the back of the gauge and re-installing with star washers can fix dodgy connections to the resistor. Don't be a ham handed gorilla when you tighten them back down... you can and will crack the ceramic substrate of the resistor. Snug with a nut driver is good enough. If it looks like the resistor is cocking to one side loosen it up and get it level with the back of the gauge can.

Rechecked the selector switch, it is working correctly. Fuel relay check OK. Transfer valve is switching when the selector switch is cycled from one side to the other. Both pumps are priming and the truck is running correctly. The gauge works for the LHS tank (selector switch in LHS position). So, I believe it is just a sending unit/grounding issue on the RHS.

If the ground on the RHS sending unit is bad, could that cause the gauge to remain in the same position as it was reading for the LHS tank?

With the selector switch on RHS, if I ground the pink/black wire on the RHS (sending unit wire), then the gauge should read E correct?

Shouldn't the gauge park at the 3:00 position if I disconnect the transfer valve 6 pin plug? It doesn't. It remains in position it was at when I disconnect it.

Hart_Rod 03-03-2020 06:36 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
I got home and did some more troubleshooting.

Things I know for sure: Selector switch checks good (New). Pump relay checks good. Transfer valve checks good (New Pollack 65 psi).
LH Tank is known 1/4 full, RH Tank is known FULL. The gauge shows 1/4 full when the tank selector switch is in LH or RH position (makes sense for the LHS, but not for the RHS).

Troubleshooting: I disconnected the plug to the RH fuel pump/sender. The gauge stayed at 1/4 full with the tank selector in LH or RH position. The truck would start and run in the LH position (pump/gauge checks good), but would not start or run in the RH position (makes sense, pump not connected).

Then, I disconnected the plug to the LH pump/sender. The gauge went to the 3:00 position with the tank selector in LH or RH position (makes sense for the LHS, but not for the RHS). The truck would start and run in the RH position (pump is working), but would not start or run in the LH position (makes sense, pump not connected).

Possible problem: Sensor ground on RH tank? Hatzie, over to you.....:lol:.

hatzie 03-04-2020 12:31 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
I'll reply later today when I have time to write it down.

Hart_Rod 03-05-2020 08:25 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8689003)
I'll reply later today when I have time to write it down.

Were you able to figure anything out? Thanks! Rob

hatzie 03-06-2020 09:35 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
It sounds like someone wired past the valve directly to the LH sender.

The valve and switch are working as they should.

Does the SPID (Service Parts Identification) label in the glovebox call out Option NL2?

The six position Weatherpak on the valve is lettered A-F. F should not have a wire so A is on the opposite end of the plug... easy to find.

With your Digital Volt Ohmmeter. What ohmage do you get when checking resistance between Valve plug A to ground & Valve plug C to ground. One of them should be 90Ω ish and the other should be somewhere around 29Ω ish... give or take a few Ω. The graph in my post above shows Ohms VS gauge position.

Hart_Rod 03-06-2020 10:02 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8689911)
It sounds like someone wired past the valve directly to the LH sender.

The valve and switch are working as they should.

Does the SPID (Service Parts Identification) label in the glovebox call out Option NL2?

The six position Weatherpak on the valve is lettered A-F. F should not have a wire so A is on the opposite end of the plug... easy to find.

With your Digital Volt Ohmmeter. What ohmage do you get when checking resistance between Valve plug A to ground & Valve plug C to ground. One of them should be 90Ω ish and the other should be somewhere around 29Ω ish... give or take a few Ω. The graph in my post above shows Ohms VS gauge position.


You may be correct about the rewiring, but this is the cleanest most unmolested old truck I have ever owned. It is a NL2 according to the window sticker. I'll ohm out the wires some time this weekend. Thanks again for all of your suggestions.

Hart_Rod 03-06-2020 10:14 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
1 Attachment(s)
This is the diagram I'm using to troubleshoot.

hatzie 03-07-2020 09:31 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
That's the NL2 option wiring for the 87-91 TBI trucks.

There's a two position Weatherpak with the wire from the B terminal of the six position Weatherpak on the valve. This plugs into the standard wiring harness. That's where I'd start looking for Mickey Mouse wiring.

This all assumes that pouring five gallons in the LH tank will raise the needle on the gauge past 1/4 tank.
Does it do that?

Hart_Rod 03-07-2020 10:20 AM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8690414)
That's the NL2 option wiring for the 87-91 TBI trucks.

There's a two position Weatherpak with the wire from the B terminal of the six position Weatherpak on the valve. This plugs into the standard wiring harness. That's where I'd start looking for Mickey Mouse wiring.

This all assumes that pouring five gallons in the LH tank will raise the needle on the gauge past 1/4 tank.
Does it do that?

LH tank showed 3/8s of a tank and I put approx 13 gals and the gauge went to full.

hatzie 03-07-2020 02:24 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
So the gauge is working.

It really sounds like the LH sender is tied directly to the gauge bypassing the sender switch in the valve.

Hart_Rod 03-08-2020 05:40 PM

Re: 1973-1991 Dual fuel tank systems theory of operation
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by hatzie (Post 8690574)
So the gauge is working.

It really sounds like the LH sender is tied directly to the gauge bypassing the sender switch in the valve.

Well after reading this thread about 100 times, studying multiple diagrams and thinking about everything that Hatzie has told me to look at, I finally figured it out. Somebody had two of the connectors plugged in wrong! Both of these connectors are by the LH tank and the wire colors are very similar (see diagram below). It's crazy that everything still worked (other than the RH tank reading incorrectly). I plugged the connectors in correctly and everything works perfect now. Thanks everyone for all the help, especially Hatzie!:metal::metal::metal::metal:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com