Re: Brake vacuum
How much initial are you at now?
What’s your idle rpm? |
Re: Brake vacuum
I checked my timing today but made the mistake of forgetting to plug the vacuum advance.
16 degrees of initial timing. 33 at 1500 Around 55 at 2500 Blueprint recommends 32-34 at 3500 (or at the point the mechanical timing stops advancing) for their engines. I didn’t feel comfortable taking it up to 3500 rpm It was running at 600 rpm at idle which seems a little low so I bumped it up to 7. The brakes are so close to working good. I think the semi metallic brake pads and boots with a vacuum canister will solve the problem. |
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
|
Re: Brake vacuum
I also found out that I have a leak from my axle shaft seal that is probably causing that drum to fail.
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
New pads and brake shoes won’t change how your brakes function.You still won’t have enough vacuum for your booster. |
Re: Brake vacuum
If I set my timing according to wha blueprint recommends, what should I set my idle speed to
|
Re: Brake vacuum
At whatever rpm your motor/trans are happy at.
|
Re: Brake vacuum
^ Right. Do you have a stock converter?, or is it higher stall?
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
More info on my build of the "66 just recently.. |
Re: Brake vacuum
I talked to the guy that reset my timing and he used a vary imprecise way of doing it. He said he only set the initial timing at around 18-20 and listened for pinging and drove it around a little and was happy. I am either going to have to do it my self or take it somewhere that will fallow the blueprint directions.
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Spent a little time with Steeveedee checking the timing and adjusting the mixture. He figured out that the timing was set at what blueprint recommended and adjusted the mixture so that I have around 16 pounds of vacuum. My breaks are working a little better but have not completely fixed the backing out of the driveway problem. I will probably add a vacuum canister just to give it a little extra help. Thank you Steve for your time and it was fun getting to know you and meeting someone from the forum.
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Right on! Nice to have met you, too. If you have time on a non-rainy first or third Saturday, there is a meetup of all kinds of vehicles at the Firestone tire store in Thousand Oaks. I've only made it a few times since I found out about it, though. That's a nice truck that people can appreciate, there.
|
Re: Brake vacuum
2 questions
1) on the stock single pot master cylinder are the bolts that connect it to the fire wall horizontal or at they more at around a 45° angle. 2) about 2 years ago I moved the bolt hole location for where the master cylinder push rod connects to the break pedal. I moved it around an inch lower because that is what I read you are supposed to do if you install power disk breaks. That was when I had my old engine and plenty of vacuum. Now that I have less vacuum because of my new engine I was wondering if it would be a good idea to move it back up to the top hole in order to get more leverage. I am trying to not have to push on my brakes as hard because I am trying to heal from a foot injury and don’t want to put too much pressure in that location. My plan is to also install a vacuum canisters. |
Re: Brake vacuum
2 Attachment(s)
I think diagonal. Here is left and right sides. You can see the old holes filled in with caulking. Inboard side low, outboard side high.
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
Does anyone know of any companies out there make a dual port master cylinder that has that kind of bolt pattern if I want to go back to manual breaks that will work with my front discs and rear drums? I looked on the willwood, pol and cpp websites and either didn’t see anything or didn’t know what I was looking at. |
Re: Brake vacuum
1 Attachment(s)
On my 63, the original master was horizontal. The brake/clutch master and heavier duty trucks used the angled bolt holes. I don't believe the orientation of the master will change your braking performance.
Have you looked into potentially using a hydroboost system? |
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
I have looked into the hydroboost system but a couple people on this thread were pretty negative about it and it’s kind of expensive. At this point I am just looking for whatever will work best without my needing put too much pressure on my foot. |
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
With all this said, I have recently received a 1940 Chevy Coupe that is way far passed stock, all set up for racing. The brakes on it are a completely different system than I have ever installed. It is using Wilwood Dual Master Cylinders - one for front and one for rear. Then there is a brake pedal mount with a proportioning adjustment built in that allows me more pressure to front or rear and somewhat adjustable. This system was installed due to very low vacuum and no power steering (no fluid pump for the hydroboost). This dual master cylinder system is very cool, fairly simple but just like Hydroboost, it is not cheap. Just wanted to throw out another option. I went with Hydroboost for my current project and previous project and love the system. Just my $.02 worth. |
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
I have seen the other system that you described on an episode of Roadkill Garage. |
Re: Brake vacuum
Quote:
|
Re: Brake vacuum
Sorry nevermind. I just realized that that line goes to the gear box so it should be facing forward.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com