The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   Suspension (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=294283)

PBFAB.COM 06-26-2008 01:31 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RunninLo (Post 2781471)
I don't have any trouble setting pinion angle myself but, Will there be some sort of locator once the old perches are removed or will this be a get out the measurin' stick and angle finder type of set-up?

just curious cause the magnet on my angle guage fell off and broke the guage so I'll get another if need.
Josh

Just eyeball it and get it close!:lol:

Yes, protractor and tape measure will NOT be optional!

jasonb72 06-26-2008 01:46 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
ALL I CAN SAY IS :metal: :devil: :ennyd:

There will be a party in my garage when it get's installed.

RunninLo 06-26-2008 01:49 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
:lol:From the looks of things that Porterbuilt 100% natural 2x4 yoke shim is all I'll need. just go ahead and toss that into the box when you ship!:lol:

PBFAB.COM 06-26-2008 02:02 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RunninLo (Post 2781490)
:lol:From the looks of things that Porterbuilt 100% natural 2x4 yoke shim is all I'll need. just go ahead and toss that into the box when you ship!:lol:

Be careful what you ask for!:lol:

gringoloco 06-26-2008 09:39 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Gangster! :cool: When does production start? I need to know when to start selling spare organs...

How tall is the notch externally- i.e; how far will the bed floor need to be raised?

jlaird 06-26-2008 10:55 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
so freakin cool!

PBFAB.COM 06-26-2008 10:59 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gringoloco (Post 2781709)
How tall is the notch externally- i.e; how far will the bed floor need to be raised?

The highest point of the assembly measures 12.5" taller than the top of the factory frame-rail at the axle centerline. It is definitely a beast.

Also, the front four-link mounts and upper link bar will require bed floor clearancing.

gringoloco 06-26-2008 11:07 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
How 'bout a shot of the carrier bearing crossmember?

RunninLo 06-30-2008 03:00 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gringoloco (Post 2781796)
How 'bout a shot of the carrier bearing crossmember?

:agree:
while you're at it those pics of the front DM upper shock mounts never materialized yet either.:waah:
Josh

Primer70 06-30-2008 03:04 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
The kit looks bad ass. My only dislike is mounting the bags over the axle, rides too rough. Making a rear mounted lift bar set up with the bags mounted half way down the bars would make a lot smother ride, just my thoughts.

azfab 06-30-2008 09:19 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
porter what do you guys offer for the rear of and 86? thanx

98L150 06-30-2008 02:51 PM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
azfab,

the answer to you question in inthe attached link.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ght=dropmember

PBFAB.COM 06-30-2008 03:36 PM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Primer70 (Post 2786855)
The kit looks bad ass. My only dislike is mounting the bags over the axle, rides too rough. Making a rear mounted lift bar set up with the bags mounted half way down the bars would make a lot smother ride, just my thoughts.

I have heard this rumor of "rough ride" with the bags mounted over the axle.... I have never had this experience, and have been mounting sleeved bags like this since I first got started. I prefer a rolling sleeve over a double convoluted on the rear hands down. There are pros and cons to both, but in my experience, ride quality is not a con for mounting a sleeved bag over the axle.;)

Chevysdominate 07-01-2008 02:37 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by porterbuilt (Post 2787347)
I have heard this rumor of "rough ride" with the bags mounted over the axle.... I have never had this experience, and have been mounting sleeved bags like this since I first got started. I prefer a rolling sleeve over a double convoluted on the rear hands down. There are pros and cons to both, but in my experience, ride quality is not a con for mounting a sleeved bag over the axle.;)

Why do you prefer a sleeve bag over a convoluted bag in the rear? Ride quality?

fastbagged68 07-01-2008 10:53 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Sleeve bags ride good in a 1:1 ratio, better then double convulated bags. But they can only be ran 1:1. The problem with them is you can not let them over extended themselves. You either need to run limit straps or use your shocks as the limiters. This is no problem if you know what you are doing. Another issue with the sleeve bag is the most popular one is an F9000. The travel on that bag is only 7.5". So if you set your car up to layout when the bag is deflated, then your ride height should be about 3-3/4" off the ground. Some might not like it that low. Also your ride will only get 7.5" off the ground then, if your laid out

PBFAB.COM 07-01-2008 01:56 PM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fastbagged68 (Post 2788548)
Sleeve bags ride good in a 1:1 ratio, better then double convulated bags. But they can only be ran 1:1. The problem with them is you can not let them over extended themselves. You either need to run limit straps or use your shocks as the limiters. This is no problem if you know what you are doing. Another issue with the sleeve bag is the most popular one is an F9000. The travel on that bag is only 7.5". So if you set your car up to layout when the bag is deflated, then your ride height should be about 3-3/4" off the ground. Some might not like it that low. Also your ride will only get 7.5" off the ground then, if your laid out

The sleeve bag displaces the air as it compreses, while a double convoluted bag compresses the air. This gives the rolling sleeve an advantage on ride quality in my opinion. The cons are travel limitations, and the fact that a sleeved bag will tear itself apart if not properly limited (by shocks or straps... just as fastbagged stated). We asre getting just under 8" of travel on our rear kits, and the ride quality is exceptional.

DA INFERNO 07-02-2008 10:56 PM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Primer70 (Post 2786855)
The kit looks bad ass. My only dislike is mounting the bags over the axle, rides too rough. Making a rear mounted lift bar set up with the bags mounted half way down the bars would make a lot smother ride, just my thoughts.

X2 I would like to see the above stated set up for 2 reasons, ride quality and for suspension travel. (More then 8") Any chance of a non "over the axle" set up.

PBFAB.COM 07-03-2008 01:04 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DA INFERNO (Post 2790885)
X2 I would like to see the above stated set up for 2 reasons, ride quality and for suspension travel. (More then 8") Any chance of a non "over the axle" set up.

I have no current plans of altering the design from the current over-the-axle to a levered double convoluted. This current set-up is my preference,and is the way I would do it on my personal vehicle (if I had the time to put one together... soon.:waah:) The travel isn't a big issue to me either, the Dropmember front gets the same amount... so their would be no reason for the rear to get more lift.

I do however, understand that others tastes/preferences/opinions will not all be the same as mine. I will be offering the notch seperately so those who would wish to change it up a bit could do so.

DA INFERNO 07-03-2008 11:28 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by porterbuilt (Post 2791042)
I have no current plans of altering the design from the current over-the-axle to a levered double convoluted. This current set-up is my preference,and is the way I would do it on my personal vehicle (if I had the time to put one together... soon.:waah:) The travel isn't a big issue to me either, the Dropmember front gets the same amount... so their would be no reason for the rear to get more lift.

I do however, understand that others tastes/preferences/opinions will not all be the same as mine. I will be offering the notch seperately so those who would wish to change it up a bit could do so.

Thank you.

chevy6guy9 07-05-2008 08:48 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
any idea on cost of rear setup yet?. id be interested in it ya have one. also can the insert sections of the step notch area be welded in plates instead of bolted incovers?. think it might look a cleaner if your having to weld brackets anyway. thanks

jkade 07-15-2008 07:25 PM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
All I can say is some dang fine work you have done there!!!!! You will sell the crap out of these I am sure.

yesman 07-27-2008 09:29 AM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
as always your work is amazing

Project SIKty-5 07-28-2008 05:33 PM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Hey Da Inferno, do you work over off of Cherry/Jensen by any chance??

DA INFERNO 07-28-2008 06:44 PM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Project SIKty-5 (Post 2825881)
Hey Da Inferno, do you work over off of Cherry/Jensen by any chance??

I have worked over there in the past but that is not my normal place.

Project SIKty-5 08-04-2008 05:25 PM

Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic
 
I thought i've seen your truck over there before....with the rear dumped and the front aired up


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com