Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
5 Attachment(s)
-
Well, I finally finished up the Eaton HO52 / Dana 60 rear end swap. The Dana was a coil spring rear end so that made the swap pretty easy. I had a few delays but it worked out good. I didn't have to cut my drive shaft. There are two different length rear shaft sections. The Eaton was 35 inches long and I had 4 or 5 different shafts I had saved and one of them had a rear section that was 33 inches long, it fit perfect. The front section of the original shaft used the small "U" joint at the carrier bearing and the front of the 33 inch rear shaft used the large "U" joint. All I had to do was purchase a Precision Brand #348 Combination "U" joint, and everything fit right together. It made a world of difference in the driveability of the truck. Now I can hear the radio over the engine.....:) Part number list is in post below All of the pictures are of the Eaton rear end as I was taking it out. LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Thanks for the post! We need to see more of these simple swaps that involve little or very little modifying. Or we could wait and wait and wait till the aftermarket decides to manufacture a HO 52 3.54 ring and pinion set for '48 thur '72 Chevy C 20's. Those 16.5's with correct era caps look great!
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
That should be a great upgrade for drivability.
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
I need to get some stock type lug nuts before I can put the rear caps on. The ones I have on there are too long. Quote:
LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
You're a half a turn ahead now. Let it roll! :cool:
I wish someone would make ring and gear sets for HO52s while there are still so many out there. It's such a great rear. Brakes are no problem as long as there are 14-bolts all over the place. A simple swap. Someone (Patrick's) made gear sets for the HO32/33s way back in the '80s to help the '50s 1/2 tons run hiway speeds. As it is our choice is rear end swapping. That's why I keep a collection of rears. |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Great job Leon! Was the HO52 a 4.57 open rear
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
Quote:
LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
-
Here are the different part numbers for the Dana 60 coil spring rear end. Brake Shoes = Bosch BS419R Hardware Kit = Raybestos H7128 Wheel Cylinders = CENTRIC 13462015 Rear Right; Rear Leaf springs CENTRIC 13462016 Rear Left; Rear Leaf springs Yes, I know they say for Leaf Springs but they fit the coil rear end and were exactly the same as the ones I took off.... ------------------------------------- I ordered these wheel cylinders on the first try and they were the wrong ones. CENTRIC 13466009 CENTRIC 13466010 LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
...Thanks again for including the part numbers here.
('interesting' that the wheel cylinders that didn't fit, are listed for coil spring) Did you by any chance replace the wheel seals? (I ordered Timken 455860 from RockAuto, hoping they are the right ones.) Thanks again, Kevin |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Nice swap. The D60 coil rear ends are probably a little more rare aren't they? Most were in leaf spring trucks from what I've seen because they were camper special big block trucks. I've seen pics of coil spring 6 lug D60s in these but never found one in the wild yet.
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
My truck came from the factory as Cab & Chassis, with Utility body installed (most likely from day one) with it's original 396, NP435 4-speed and a Dana60 Coil spring rear. Along with Special paint, I guess I was lucky to find it : ) https://imageevent.com/hvclassics/au...=1&n=1&l=0&z=9 |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
From the research I did a while ago, big block trucks got the D60. I'm guessing that was because the Eaton's did not have a 3.54 gear ratio available.
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Just received Napa UP UP419R Brake shoes yesterday, and as someone else posted both front and rear shoes (have not figured out which are supposed to be rear facing) are the same length. They are correct for the 12 inch drum and 2.5 inch width, but I have never seen this. Normally the rear shoe lining is longer. Not so here. These are riveted relined, labeled "made in china". I am done testing, and these will go on the truck, as this truck will not see heavy use or high miles, but am disappointed, as they have far less lining than what came off. I will try to get a photo of old and new when I attempt to figure out which is which -- the linings are not centered on the metal that the lining is riveted to, which leads me to believe it does matter on placement. Perhaps FLT FT419R (fleet) would have been correct???
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
short shoe forward
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
I don't know, It's hard to tell by the pictures. LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
It looks like one shoe has the lining closer to the top and one shoe has the lining closer to the bottom on each side..... LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
The shoe with the lining farthest from the top would go on the front. LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
I agree, the bare lining table at the top should be forward..
interesting that the lower end of the rear shoe lining table is also bare.. probably cost savings, only manufacture one lining, just oriented for F or R shoe.. https://dl.dropbox.com/s/jl3vytc9jpg...02416.jpg?dl=0 https://dl.dropbox.com/s/kl8q7e5bfml...02500.jpg?dl=0 |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
good job on that axle swap Doc!
I scored a D60 4:10 LS leaf sprung for my k20 burb, then later scored a 4:10 locker third for the 4:10 eaton in it.. red longhorn has a factory locker so thinkin I might haul that D60 home for the ochre longhorn.. swap my leftover 4:10 eaton gears into the red longhorn and everything will be just right for my uses :) |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
I bought the same NAPA shoes a couple of years ago and found the same problem. At the time, i checked the other retail part stores and found the same shoes. They all had part numbers that were a variation of Napa's 419 part number.
This thread from last year talks about the same shoes. https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...ighlight=shoes The shoes seem to work OK when driving. Having disc brakes on the front may be a factor on that. I did find that when parked, nose up on a hill the e-brake had to be applied extra hard to keep it from rolling back. You don't always have curb to turn the wheel against. I think it sucks that they can't give you the correct lining length for the rear shoe. |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
Thanks. That sounds like a lot of swappin' to me. I was glad to get the one done.... :) I needed the 3.54 to make it easier to drive on the highway. I do very little work with it. Heck, I do very little work anyway... :( LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
I did a coil spring Dana 60 swap last year for a friend. What did you do for the track bar? I think that the bracket at the frame is different. Stock track bar from the Eaton was a different length and the angle at the bracket on the frame was more than the one for the Eaton. I shortened his and am looking for the correct bracket. When I got the rear end, I got the rear part of the driveshaft and the track bar but didn’t think to get the bracket. Glad to see someone else has done this also. My friend really likes the 3:54 versus the mid 4: ratio that the Eaton had. I think you’ll like it too.
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
I heated the Dana 60 bar right in the middle and bent it over so it lined up with the frame bracket, jacked the frame over about 3/8 inch toward the passengers side and put the bolt in. Lined up on the first try and the bolt slid right in. LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ght=Brake+shoe |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
The reason I ask about the donor, is that I do not know if there is a difference in the brake package between a C20 Suburban Dana 60, a C20 Truck coil-sprung D60, and a C20 leaf-sprung D60. It sounds like your new rear has the 12x2.5" brakes that G70 trucks have. |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
Not 100% sure. I think I picked it up over at the salvage yard. They are kind of hard to find. LockDoc |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
If you are looking for a Dana 60 you might look under the Dodge trucks. My GMC 2500 came with the 292 six and a Dana 60 with 4.56 gears. I ran across a Dodge D200 with 3.54 gears and a posi carrier in a wrecking yard for $50. The Dodge Dana is the same except for different yoke splines and they use the smaller "U" joints. A 4 wheel shop had a yoke with dodge splines, but for the larger "U" joint.
3.54 gears, even with a six, made a bigger, single difference than most everything else I have done to the truck, except maybe the AC. |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
I talked with a guy from VintageChevyTrucks and he did say that C20s with coils are uncommon and that C20 suburbans would be the best bet.
I currently have a Dana with 4.10s and, yes, even with my 4L80 I'm going to switch to 3.54s. Maybe I'll make a post in the suburban section and see if anyone knows if their Dana has 12x2.5" brakes. |
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
Quote:
|
Re: Dana 60 3.54 in the '68 Chevy C20
1 Attachment(s)
Dad said the 3.54 gear would swell the converter up to the point of killing the thrust surface in the 454 in old blue.
True ? I don't know. But probably pulling this up the grapevine at 55 in 2nd had more to do with it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com