View Single Post
Old 06-03-2008, 02:18 PM   #6
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,924
Re: Dropmember Rear 63-72 Spy Pic

Quote:
Originally Posted by gringoloco View Post
Lookin' good! 'Bout time

So, you're using an off the shelf adapter plate instead of the PB plates? I would definitely recommend the F-body pan; from test fits in the Blazer, I would say it is a necessity.
I have the sbc DM because that's what was installed in the truck when I made the purchase. I was looking for a 5.3/4l60e for my 74 when I ran across the 6.0/4l80e & figured it would be great for my Beater/tow vehicle. Nate & I have discussed possible options. He'll be working on something on his end & while waiting, I figured I would attack it from mine.

I made 'adapter' plates that are bolted to the LS block & prepped them for both the 'stock' sbc location as well as the 1" set back. After my initial attempt last night, the sbc holes in the plate were very close. The issue I did run into was between the height of the truck intake & the depth of the truck pans sump it was very difficult to get a confirmation that adapter plates will work.

From info I found via the net, the f-body pan is 3" more shallow vs. the truck pan. What I'm trying to confirm @ this time is specifics on the Caddy CTSv pan. It's very similar to the f-body pan dimensionally & apparently uses the same windage tray as the trucks (which means less stuff to buy/mess with).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 06-03-2008 at 02:23 PM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote