Quote:
Originally Posted by CarbonRight
So there is about a $350 difference between this setup and the fatbar when they are both using Ridetech shocks. What are the advantages of going with this vs your fatbar setup?
Posted via Mobile Device
|
Fair question. It's really kind of "Apples vs. Oranges". We wanted to do an actual 'Bolt-in' rear upgrade for a long time. So, the Trailing arm kit was developed. The extra cost mostly has to do with the extra hardware cost in the arms, monster balls, and hardware for the panhard rod. On the plus side, this kit can be installed in a day, with a grinder, a drill, and a Craftsman tool kit. Now, if you have a torch or plasma cutter to help with the rivets, it can be done a lot faster. But, no welding at all.
The Fatbar was originally designed for 55-59 Chevs and 53-56 F100s. (sorry for the F word) And, over the years, we tuned on the design to get the best ride and handling we could from a classic truck. It's advantage when compared to the O.E. trailing arm was in Instant Center location/tuning, and the lack of binding during articulation. (we didn't have Monster balls back then) But remember, the Fatbar has parts that MUST be welded to the axle housing. Thus, the install takes a little longer, and requires more tools and skill.
In head to head competition, the Fatbar may win out due to it's ability to launch and exit the corner. On the road, the trailing arm may be a little more compliant due to it's longer travel. As for cost, an increase in hardware offsets some addition labor to install. Take your pick, it's a Win-Win.