|
Re: CPP front Coilover Kit
Quote:
Originally Posted by wickedred
That is the explanation I was given the signal time I got someone on the phone with CPP. The lower Coilover mount is the issue for me. I could rework that to allow longer shock travel. Then I figure run into the same issue the QA1 truck above was having. The lower shock mount is an issue when it comes to ground clearance. This boils down to give and take and the purpose of the truck in general though.
|
I actually thought the CPP front 'C10 C/O Conversion Kit' captured the C/O spring @ both ends but just looked @ install images only to learn they're not captured @ the top as 68Stepbed mentioned.
Yet another reason for me to not care for the kit
I will admit their a-arms aren't 'bad'....
I just feel the tech about them offering geometry benefits is misleading since they basically come with 'The Caster Mod' done for you which = tubular versions of stock arms 
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG
Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....
Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
|