View Single Post
Old 01-09-2012, 07:11 PM   #104
BMERDOC
Registered User
 
BMERDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Richmond,Va
Posts: 2,934
Re: 2WD C10 Modern/Performance Alignments

Mike, the discrepancy in dynamic toe changes is why I recommend setting toe at the average of the spec. I see the point in engineering allowances for suspension deflection. I myself am not terribly worried about getting the utmost from toe settings on a street truck because I not tryng to shave tenths off my lap times. Please don't think I'm knocking you, I'm not. I thank you for the additional thoughts and info. I would like to experiment with the toe settings for road feel on my truck once I feel caster and camber are where they should be.
I didn't look back for the specs but I think that I was refering to an E46 M3. The specs for that car are 6.92 to 7.92 for caster and and -.67 to -1.33 for camber. I'm not sure of the spec on my E36 325i (I know, shame on me) but the next time one is on the rack I'll be sure to check the specs.
__________________
Nick Carter
1967 C10 Short bed Fleetside
Project Cheap Thrills!
2WD C10 Modern/Performance Alignments
Easiest Alignment Ever!

Last edited by BMERDOC; 01-09-2012 at 07:25 PM.
BMERDOC is offline   Reply With Quote