View Single Post
Old 11-23-2021, 10:37 AM   #12
wickedred
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bowling Green kY
Posts: 54
Re: CPP front Coilover Kit

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68Stepbed View Post
So, in 2017, I was able to get the Total Cost Involved kit for my truck. I've been able to learn alot when it comes to suspension geometry and how it all works. I've also seen many of these products in action in the autocross field. I understand that many aren't after all-out handling performance, but they do want improvements over stock.

Here's what I'm seeing.

Ridetech may be the most expensive coilover conversion kit, but they have done extensive R&D and their stuff works very well with lots of victories to show for it.

QA1 seems to have a well made product, but I've not seen any major competitiveness from any of their products. They talk the talk in their advertisements, but nothing to back it up yet.

CPP.....well....they seem to be a bandwagon company. They just copy what others have done with no R&D to make sure anything works. The front is not a true captured coilover shock unit. Also, the shock and spring is way too short for any travel gains. The control arms are the same generic stuff they've always offered made to stock geometry specs, so there's still no gain in camber/caster/motion ratio. The rear system simply replaces the shocks with coilovers, but all in the stock location. In case you haven't heard by now, the rear shock location on the 63-72 trailing arm setup is an absolute horrible design. It was fine for guys hauling hay, feed, and seed for farm use in the 60s-70s, but there's no gain in the performance aspect. The design actually binds under certain conditions.
Let's not forget the terrible customer service from CPP that's actually been discussed already.

I try to tell people to shop around and RESEARCH before buying. Yes, some kits may be more expensive, but sometimes, you're not just buying a name, you're buying the time they took to make sure it's right.

I'll also add that everything TCI makes is made in house at their Ontario, CA, USA facility with USA steel. Nothing is outsourced from other companies and/or countries.
Awesome explanation. Thank You.

I am not adverse to spending $$$$.
I bought a Flat Out Engineering crossmember and then sourced all the parts less the rack and pinion. All only to find out you have to raise the engine up, which will kill driveline angles. The other option is pushing the engine back into the firewall like Dustin Reed did with this suspension and his C10. While this works its not 100% ideal for me. Still not out of the question though.

Hunter Beacon's C10 runs the QA1 C10 Suspension. Met him at the Pro Touring Truck Shootout in Bowling Green. He was running in the T2 class and the truck was very impressive for a bolt on suspension. I did discuss some improvements he was planning.

I have seen RideTech on plenty of trucks. No doubt it works. I was leaning towards their front Coilover conversion and No limits Trailing arms rear suspension.

Your description of CPP hits the nail on the head. Maybe okay for a cruiser...
__________________
1984 K5 Blazer 4x4. Because my daily driver needs to be a project too...

1971 C10. Auto Cross/Pro Touring Build. Project : I am gonna go broke with this one.

1970 Chevy LWB 4x4. 355, 4spd, Dana 44 front, Dana 60 rear, 35x12.50 tires... STOLEN

I will put a Turbo on anything with an engine if the $$$ is right. Once upon a time....
wickedred is offline   Reply With Quote