Re: 1970 350 vs. 1978 350 ???
Quote:
Originally Posted by franken
Call me crazy, but (given the platform) I'd probably go with either 350 block, a longer crank, the Vortec heads and a minimal overbore. Close to 100 cubes of displacement is bound to be noticeable (in response to the 283 comments).
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67 twins
Oh I'm sure you will, but I don't need 400hp to get the job done. The best part is there are a lot of people that think as you do making it easy for me to pick up 283s cheap.
|
Nostalgia is great but that doesn't mean it makes sense.
We are talking about trucks so the additional crank stroke & cubes of a 350 w/the right choice in heads = more torque. Additional torque is a difference maker when doing truck stuff. There's absolutely nothing wrong w/a 283. If his current engine was in a good state of repair, I wouldn't swap a 350 just to have a 350. But if it's worn & wounded, upsizing to the 350 makes sense here.
He can continue to utilize what's currently there while building the next power-plant. If he's buying an extra sbc to build, building for increased torque makes more sense than the nostalgia of being able to say "It's a 283".
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG
Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....
Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
Last edited by SCOTI; 01-31-2023 at 05:17 PM.
|