The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-25-2011, 04:22 PM   #1
feller
Registered User
 
feller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: madison, IN.
Posts: 484
pros and cons??

ok so i get that the ls engins make awesome power and that they are strong but i was curious could a guy get as much dependablity out of the efi retrofit kits that they sell to go on bbc and sbc motors. cause it seems if a guy wanted better fuel milage he could spend about the same coin or a little less depending on what kit, and still have efi and i assume just as good mpg's?? i am just curious to hear what everyone thinks about this, so please give me your thoughts. thank you in advance
feller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2011, 06:12 PM   #2
hammer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: conroe texas
Posts: 58
Re: pros and cons??

for what you pay on the efi kits, couple hundred dollars more you can do a ls swap with a 5.3
hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2011, 06:17 PM   #3
Clyde65
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
 
Clyde65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,540
Re: pros and cons??

The LS motors will burn more efficiently because that is what they were designed for, the SBC or BBC were not made for efficiency they were made to last, which they will.
__________________
Clyde65

Rebuild of Clyde
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184

69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684



support our troops!
Clyde65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2011, 09:52 PM   #4
feller
Registered User
 
feller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: madison, IN.
Posts: 484
Re: pros and cons??

hammer thats what i am getting at, i am just kind up in the air at this time has anyone put the efi retrofit kits on a truck or car was it worth it? i mean it looks easier and yes clyde65 the ls is meant to be efficent. just trying to look at the whole picture
feller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2011, 11:17 PM   #5
Robznob11
Registered User
 
Robznob11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: brownfield texas (west texas)
Posts: 1,936
Re: pros and cons??

there are many more benifits to the ls engine than just gas milage. it is better all around the board. I mean its like comparing a orginal apple computer to an new dell. the design of the engine has benifets everywhere. and from what i have seen most aftermarket efi units for the old engines are just not up to par. the new oe stuff will compete with those 2000+ kits.
ps im not bias because i used to be all about 383s and my engine before the ls was a 496bb stroker. just got to roll with the changes. better everything in a small light weight package. aftermarket sbc heads can bearly touch a set of the mildest ls offerings.
__________________
The Ghost 67 short wide full custom. 550 hp LSX, 4l80E, narrowed 9". Body dropped w/air ride!
........................ ___
.........________//__{\_____
,,,,,,,/__(⊙)___//___/__(O)_/

@disciple2.rc 💪instagram💪
LED TAILS
Robznob11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2011, 12:07 AM   #6
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: pros and cons??

another thing to consider is the type of efi kits your talking about. Some of them are nothing more than a TBI setup, which gives limited economy and has limited power support. Even some of the more expensive multi point setups have limited tuning ability because they use proprietary computers.
The LS computer setup can be accessed by a number of different programs like efilive and hptuners. You can have most shops tune these systems, as well as learn to access them yourself if you desire to do so. Heck, you can run a carbed ls engine and still have more power and economy that an sbc would.

That being said; if your handy and want to do it on the cheap, try working with a diy megasquirt setup. By far the most work but also the cheapest and adaptable to virtually anything.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2011, 10:58 AM   #7
feller
Registered User
 
feller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: madison, IN.
Posts: 484
Re: pros and cons??

all good coments thank you all. now i got to sell "the boss" on the idea. lol
feller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 07:25 PM   #8
68GMCCustom
Truck and auto performance nut
 
68GMCCustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
Re: pros and cons??

consider it this way.....there were various types of efi SBC's (and BBC's?) in the 80's and 90's before the LSx's motors came around...and they weren't as powerful or as economical as the LSx's that replaced them.

I understand you can retrofit a coil on plug system, crank (and cam?) sensor run efi kit similar to what an LSx has stock, to the sbc but it still won't be an LSx. I too was running a 383 stroker sbc before my current engine.
__________________
Kurt -

'68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy
'72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close
'06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD
'18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver
'95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto...

my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken
A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken
68GMCCustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 08:22 PM   #9
feller
Registered User
 
feller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: madison, IN.
Posts: 484
Re: pros and cons??

that was a verry good point 68gmc custom!!!! i never thought of it that way. ok one more question. what am i looking at when i see ls1,ls2,3,4,5,6...... yadayada. all i know is 4.8, 5.3, 6.0, 6.2, 8.1 and im thinking there was an early 5.7? mabey where do the ls's fall into the mix? i have heard of an lq9 i think it was a 6.0?? mabey? and are the intakes all interchangeable? my first project (when i get the go ahead from wife) will be my monte carlo and it has a 200-4r tranny that i would like to keep but the tv cable kit that i am finding online says will only work with an ls1 throtle body and intake i assume too but i havent a clue.
feller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 09:08 AM   #10
Clyde65
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
 
Clyde65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,540
Re: pros and cons??

This here will tell you all about LS engines.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_LS_engine

I have heard some guys can get the 200/700 TV cables to work on the LS' but I have others tell me it didnt work for them. Bowtye overdrives would be a good start to ask, they also have a easyTV bracket that I was told works.

Good luck!
__________________
Clyde65

Rebuild of Clyde
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184

69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684



support our troops!
Clyde65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 10:45 AM   #11
68GMCCustom
Truck and auto performance nut
 
68GMCCustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
Re: pros and cons??

you can keep your 200-4r...you just need a cable operated throttle body... vs a DBW or drive by wire electronic throttle body that also requires the pedal assembly with sensor. If you're looking for economy I'd go with a 4.8liter or the larger 5.3 vs a 5.7, 6.0 or 6.2. Either can give you 300+hp (350+ w/5.3) or more and return nice economy when coupled with a overdrive transmission.
__________________
Kurt -

'68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy
'72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close
'06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD
'18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver
'95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto...

my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken
A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken
68GMCCustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 11:11 AM   #12
feller
Registered User
 
feller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: madison, IN.
Posts: 484
Re: pros and cons??

i love this forum!! you guys rock!!!! so all i really need is a brive by cable and ill be good with that. great.
feller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 11:41 AM   #13
Clyde65
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
 
Clyde65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,540
Re: pros and cons??

Yes, also the bowtie overdrive bracket. Drive by cable was stock on 99-02 trucks, 99-05 vans, drive by wire started in 03 for trucks and 05 for vans. but you can switch the intakes easily
__________________
Clyde65

Rebuild of Clyde
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184

69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684



support our troops!
Clyde65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com