5.3 to Trans Help

[Tuffy66]

OK guys I need a little help / clarification. I am going to put a 5.3 carb in my 66 c10. Im going to be using the stock 4speed transmission. Im curious if anybody on here actually has done it. I have been doing some researching and well its confusing, since some people say to do it this way and other says do it this way. And it seems most posts are "this should work in theory". So i guess im asking for a little help from someone who has done it.

Thanks in advance

[truckdude239]

The bolt pattern is the same its just finding a flywheel and clutch set up to work
Posted via Mobile Device

[Tuffy66]

OK heres what I came up with. Guys have been saying to use NFW 1050 older style flywheel with a LS2 pilot bearing. Then just use the clutch and pressure plate from my trans now. Some guys say that I have to use a .040" spacer but then another guy says it not needed. To me that if I use the spacer I would run into starter issues. What do you guy think?

[71chevystep4x4]

I used my stock 4 speed, and used the flywheel and pilot bearing that you stated, with the Centerforce dual friction clutch that I had saved from my last engine. You DO NOT need an additional spacer, the flywheel has the .400 thickness that you need. Only thing that you have to modify, is remove the little pins that come on the flywheel, then you will have to drill 3 of the pressure plate holes on your clutch just a tad bigger in order for the bolts to fit. Get a set of ARP metric flywheel bolts and your good to go.

[clinebarger]

Originally Posted by 71chevystep4x4

I used my stock 4 speed, and used the flywheel and pilot bearing that you stated, with the Centerforce dual friction clutch that I had saved from my last engine. You DO NOT need an additional spacer, the flywheel has the .400 thickness that you need. Only thing that you have to modify, is remove the little pins that come on the flywheel, then you will have to drill 3 of the pressure plate holes on your clutch just a tad bigger in order for the bolts to fit. Get a set of ARP metric flywheel bolts and your good to go.

How are you centering the pressure plate? Sounds like a vibration waiting to happen.

[71chevystep4x4]

The other 3 pressure plate holes are the correct size for the new metric bolts, and are a staggered pattern, so the pressure plate is already held into place where it is going to be by the time you have to slightly enlarge the other three. I was concerned with the idea as well, but am very pleased with how smooth it turned out.

[rwhite692]

Originally Posted by Tuffy66

OK heres what I came up with. Guys have been saying to use NFW 1050 older style flywheel with a LS2 pilot bearing. Then just use the clutch and pressure plate from my trans now. Some guys say that I have to use a .040" spacer but then another guy says it not needed. To me that if I use the spacer I would run into starter issues. What do you guy think?

It should be mentioned that, while the LS1 flywheel will "function" with an old-school 10.5 or 12" clutch, it is the WRONG solution because of the large amount of material that is missing from the center contact area of the LS1 style flywheel; A typical 10.5" or 12" clutch as we have with an old-school SBC clutch will only have about half of its friction surface actually engaged with the flywheel, because of this.

Like many others, I read may posts here and elsewhere about simply using the LS1 flywheel (Sachs NFW1050) and was all fired up about being able to spend only 65 bucks on that flywheel, and be in business. Not the case.

The McLeod flywheel (460535) is the right flywheel to use, unfortunately it is $400 but there is presently no cheap alternative. Novak also sells a flywheel (which I am 99 percent sure IS the McLeod 460535).


LS1 Flywheel (Sachs NFW1050):




The McLeod 460535:



Excellent depiction of the problem that exists when trying to use the LS1 style flywheel (taken from Novak's site):

[71chevystep4x4]

Fact is, that no one can afford the Mcloed flywheel, and after three solid years of use my current set up has proven just fine with the SACHSnfw1050 flywheel. Most of us don't have the time to just sit around and wait for the next perfect solution.
Posted via Mobile Device

[rwhite692]

It may work fine if you never push your truck hard; and if you just cruise around town....just don't kid yourself that it's the right way to do it.

Using that setup, you literally have about half of a normal clutch engagement.

I regularly wheel my 72 blazer on the rocks; its not an option for me to run that way. Making it out and making it home are the priorities, hence I had no problem paying the $$$ for the McLeod flywheel.
Posted via Mobile Device

[BR3W CITY]

Originally Posted by 71chevystep4x4

Fact is, that no one can afford the Mcloed flywheel,

What? I'd actually say automotive hobbyists are the MOST likely to dig up $400 for a flywheel.

[71chevystep4x4]

That's a good point, maybe I'm the only broke one trying to fix up my truck.
Posted via Mobile Device