The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2019, 11:42 PM   #1
toddoky
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueJeep View Post
Todd, can you educate me on how your hooker engine mounts compare to the poly leaf-spring type bushing mounts for vibrations? Thanks!
I can’t make a comparison to the cylindrical poly mount inserts you are referring to as I’ve never designed a set of swap mounts that use them or driven a vehicle that has been equipped with them. I can however make a direct comparison to GM factory 4th-Gen F-Body mounts, because that’s what I design all the Hooker Blackheart LS and LT engine swaps to use. That gives the user the option to use stock rubber replacement mounts, or aftermarket poly inserts in the clamshells, both of which will be available from many sources for years to come.
Posted via Mobile Device
toddoky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2019, 10:09 PM   #2
BlueJeep
Registered User
 
BlueJeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waukee, Iowa
Posts: 1,608
Re: Hooker Blackheart 1967-72 C10 Truck LS/LT Swap System Info Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by toddoky View Post
I can’t make a comparison to the cylindrical poly mount inserts you are referring to as I’ve never designed a set of swap mounts that use them or driven a vehicle that has been equipped with them. I can however make a direct comparison to GM factory 4th-Gen F-Body mounts, because that’s what I design all the Hooker Blackheart LS and LT engine swaps to use. That gives the user the option to use stock rubber replacement mounts, or aftermarket poly inserts in the clamshells, both of which will be available from many sources for years to come.
Posted via Mobile Device
I bought the Holley mounts, and have a quick question for you. Any idea why the poly insert is offset to the right as it's mounted up in the clamshell? I see the OEM F-Body mounts are the same, so I assume to make a direct replacement you had to, but I'm wondering about the reason for it. Thanks!
__________________
build threads:

86 Suburban
88 Jeep 6.0 swap
49 Chevy truck
54 Chevy wagon

86 Suburban lowered 4/6
54 Chevy wagon
49 Chevy/s10 mix
88 Jeep Wrangler rockcrawler
BlueJeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2019, 12:53 PM   #3
toddoky
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 264
Re: Hooker Blackheart 1967-72 C10 Truck LS/LT Swap System Info Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueJeep View Post
I bought the Holley mounts, and have a quick question for you. Any idea why the poly insert is offset to the right as it's mounted up in the clamshell? I see the OEM F-Body mounts are the same, so I assume to make a direct replacement you had to, but I'm wondering about the reason for it. Thanks!
Yes, the Hooker Blackheart mounts are designed off of the geometry of the stock GM 4th-gen mounts so as to be interchangeable with them. I can't say for sure why GM built the offset/bias into the inserts, but I would figure it had something to do with the architecture of the 4th-gen cars that required it to be that way. They could have also done it to have a single part number fit both sides of the engine to increase their order quantities and lower production costs.
toddoky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com