|
04-23-2024, 01:02 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 2,967
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
.
Looking good! From what I understand, standard shocks should work fine in the front. Rear, I'm not so sure. -klb
__________________
67 C10 fleet fuel injected '70 402, 700r4, 3.73 posi 07 335 sport turbo 6sp 94 Trans Am GT LT1 6sp posi -- sold after 22yrs 99 540 sport V8 6sp -- sold 73 240z L24 4sp -- given to friend 68 C10 step 350/350 3.73 open -- sold |
04-24-2024, 03:16 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: konawa ok/oakdale Ca.
Posts: 1,648
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
Looks good.
|
04-24-2024, 09:44 PM | #3 |
Active Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: central oregon
Posts: 177
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
3/5 springs on mine never rubbed on any speed bumps. Still not low enough for me so i put 2” blocks in the rear and waiting on disc with drop 2.5” drop spindles for the front. Truck rides amazingly well on the springs and relocated shocks
|
04-25-2024, 09:10 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: near salem, oregon
Posts: 28
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
theres a speed bump by the costco thats near me thats just the absolute worst. so tall amd narrow. cost of being low,
|
Bookmarks |
|
|