The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board > 67-72 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Projects and Builds

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2022, 10:57 AM   #1
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

More pics.
Attached Images
     
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 11:03 AM   #2
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

At this point, I drove it around a couple different times. Seemed to help a little but nothing drastic. The app on my phone I am using still said the same frequency was there but lower db. I will show these later.

So I saw that Magnaflow was making these quarter wave resonator kits on a set of their muffler kits. I'm using 2" pipe for the resonators on my 3" exhaust and thought 2 things. Maybe it's not working as well because of the diameter, or maybe I have too tight of a bend from 3" exhaust to resonator piping(not perpendicular enough)??

So I built something similar to what I saw on the magnaflow kits using leftover 3" pipe I had.

Attached Images
     
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 11:04 AM   #3
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

more pics.
Attached Images
  
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 11:19 AM   #4
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

So here is the first result from my app driving around before I put these resonators on. Then I used the resonator spreadsheet I found online(from Lawrence Tolman(LT) from his youtube channel, powernation trucktech guy).

I ran several tests and the average number was 116Hz. So I plugged that into the calc. My drone is around 1700 RPM mostly so I used the 35" number for length. I went exactly 35".

.
Attached Images
  
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".

Last edited by TA_C10; 04-15-2022 at 11:28 AM.
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 11:08 AM   #5
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Basically those new tips, with expanding 3" diameter, didn't do a thing, actually it was louder. With the 2" clamps I bought, I can actually adjust the tips up to almost 3" difference. But none of this made a difference really.

I ended up putting back the original 2" tips back on at same length, and after driving around with them back on, they made the biggest difference in keeping drone down. But it's still there. I'm not sure if my calculations were just bad or what the issue is but this just isn't making enough of a difference to justify. My guess is my design is just not right because I hear a lot of others saying this works.
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 11:25 AM   #6
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

And here is the result, the best I could get it. It dropped from -15 to -20 db almost. So the drone is still there, but quieter. I was expecting it to be completely cancelled. If you guys have any suggestions let me know.

I lengthened the pipe with my clamps, playing with several different configurations. I also shortened the pipe by turning the 2" capped end's 180 degree and putting them in the clamps backwards. But that shorted it probably down to like 25-28" and if you look at the spreadsheet, longer should have worked better than shorter. Nothing worked except the original 35" I originally built them to, which the Hz is still the same pretty much, but the db's went down.

I dunno.....

.
Attached Images
 
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 11:36 AM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,933
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by TA_C10 View Post
And here is the result, the best I could get it. It dropped from -15 to -20 db almost. So the drone is still there, but quieter. I was expecting it to be completely cancelled. If you guys have any suggestions let me know.

I lengthened the pipe with my clamps, playing with several different configurations. I also shortened the pipe by turning the 2" capped end's 180 degree and putting them in the clamps backwards. But that shorted it probably down to like 25-28" and if you look at the spreadsheet, longer should have worked better than shorter. Nothing worked except the original 35" I originally built them to, which the Hz is still the same pretty much, but the db's went down.

I dunno.....

.
This is exactly what I wondered. Would the ends justify the means? I guess even that (the answer) is subjective. Some might view reduction as a win. Others seeking complete cancellation probably wouldn't.

Are you happy w/it as-is or are you going to keep @ it?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 11:45 AM   #8
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
This is exactly what I wondered. Would the ends justify the means? I guess even that (the answer) is subjective. Some might view reduction as a win. Others seeking complete cancellation probably wouldn't.

Are you happy w/it as-is or are you going to keep @ it?
I would like to keep at it. It didn't cancel out my drone. I think my design is flawed. Maybe I'm WAY off on the length? I found another spreadsheet from internet that has significantly different results in length of pipe. Check it out below. I plug in my frequency at 114 or 116, and length is saying 10", not 35". Maybe I will try shortening them?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1183590515

.
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 12:32 PM   #9
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,933
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by TA_C10 View Post
I would like to keep at it. It didn't cancel out my drone. I think my design is flawed. Maybe I'm WAY off on the length? I found another spreadsheet from internet that has significantly different results in length of pipe. Check it out below. I plug in my frequency at 114 or 116, and length is saying 10", not 35". Maybe I will try shortening them?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=1183590515

.
One of the reasons I suggested a telescoping approach (how do I know which calculation method is more accurate?). Do you have pics of one of your finished pipes?

My thought is still make the 'T' into the main exhaust lines. Weld a 90° turn on the 'T'. Make a short (~3"L) 'end piece'. Use the wrap-around style exhaust clamps (2x clamps @ each assembly so 4x total) to secure varying lengths of pipe between the 90° & the end piece.

What size tubing did you wind up using?
Attached Images
 
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 05:41 PM   #10
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
One of the reasons I suggested a telescoping approach (how do I know which calculation method is more accurate?). Do you have pics of one of your finished pipes?

My thought is still make the 'T' into the main exhaust lines. Weld a 90° turn on the 'T'. Make a short (~3"L) 'end piece'. Use the wrap-around style exhaust clamps (2x clamps @ each assembly so 4x total) to secure varying lengths of pipe between the 90° & the end piece.

What size tubing did you wind up using?
Post 1173 shows my final setup. I used the clamps your showing. It allowed me to slide my pipe out about 3" so I can adjust that much. I used 2.5" tubing. Those other tips I made from 3" tubing didn't help.

Yeah I will probably cut it down again too 10" or so and with my 3" adjustability try that new length from the second spreadsheet I found.
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2022, 03:28 PM   #11
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post

What size tubing did you wind up using?
oops, I said 2.5" tubing.... I used 2" not 2.5".
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 04:10 PM   #12
rickcdewitt
Registered User
 
rickcdewitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 163
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

This might hide the drone?
Attached Images
 
__________________
1970 k20 6.0l/nv4500/np205/14bff in progress
build linkhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=677014
rickcdewitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 04:11 PM   #13
rickcdewitt
Registered User
 
rickcdewitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 163
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Seriously though,i wonder if distance from the motor is an issue? Or if they need to be after the flowmasters to cancel their noise?
__________________
1970 k20 6.0l/nv4500/np205/14bff in progress
build linkhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=677014
rickcdewitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2022, 05:46 PM   #14
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickcdewitt View Post
This might hide the drone?



Quote:
Originally Posted by rickcdewitt View Post
Seriously though,i wonder if distance from the motor is an issue? Or if they need to be after the flowmasters to cancel their noise?
Everything I read was closer to motor the better. Says the exhaust frequency starts from motor. But if the mufflers are what is changing the note causing the drone then that makes sense. The magnaflow kit with quarter wave resonator built in is installed on the muffler itself, it's on the front of muffler, inlet side, not sure here...
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2019, 05:50 PM   #15
MDPotter
Senior Member
 
MDPotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 1,165
Re: TA_C10: Stage 1

Beautiful work man. I'll be happy if mine comes out half that nice.
__________________
1964 Chevy C10 - Gen IV 5.3 Restomod http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=768632
1968 GMC C15 - Gen III 6.0 Restomod http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=772047
1969 Chevy C10 - Restoration http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=809184
1978 Chevy Scottsdale K20
1993 Chevy C1500 - 5.3/T56 swapped
2008 Silverado Duramax
MDPotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com