The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevy/GMC Suburbans & Panels Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2022, 02:29 PM   #1
nightmare
Senior Member
 
nightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hammond, WI
Posts: 1,794
Moog Front Springs

So I saw the thread about 6082 vs 6102 for the front springs, but that talks about the trucks. What about for the burbs? Need to replace mine, am getting the Moog 6101 for the rear. Thoughts?
__________________
Mike

2001 Dakota R/T - Silver CC - 1 of 1671 •360 w/46RE •392 limited slip
1972 Chevy Suburban - Turquoise/Black
1969 Chevy C/10 - Blue LWB •350 w/ 700R4 •3.73 posi •PS PB A/C - SOLD

Using your turn signal is not "giving information to the enemy"

67-72 FAQ

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMCMAX View Post
My lugnuts require more torque than your honda makes!

Last edited by nightmare; 06-09-2022 at 08:01 PM.
nightmare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2022, 07:36 AM   #2
nightmare
Senior Member
 
nightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hammond, WI
Posts: 1,794
Re: Moog Front Springs

Nobody has replaced the front springs with either of these?
__________________
Mike

2001 Dakota R/T - Silver CC - 1 of 1671 •360 w/46RE •392 limited slip
1972 Chevy Suburban - Turquoise/Black
1969 Chevy C/10 - Blue LWB •350 w/ 700R4 •3.73 posi •PS PB A/C - SOLD

Using your turn signal is not "giving information to the enemy"

67-72 FAQ

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMCMAX View Post
My lugnuts require more torque than your honda makes!
nightmare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2022, 01:27 PM   #3
HO455
Post Whore
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 10,796
Re: Moog Front Springs

I believe we need some more information on your truck and your intentions. Things like tire sizes. Are looking for it to sit flat or raked? Lowered, factory or, lifted?

As far as Suburbans vs trucks the biggest difference in spring rates from the factory would be in the rear. The weight on the front wheels of a Suburban isn't much different than a pick-up but, the rear axle carries five to eight hundred pounds more than a pick-up (Both with no cargo or passengers.)

My opinion is that front spring recommendations from a pick-up will be reasonably acceptable for a Burban. As long as it is apples to apples. In other words if you have a BBC TH400 with A/C and buddy buckets in your Burban, spring recommendations from a 250 3 speed manual short box stripper truck won't be very applicable.

I hope this helps.
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban the WMB,1991 S(stink)-10 Blazer,1969 GTO, 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird. 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2022, 02:12 PM   #4
nightmare
Senior Member
 
nightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hammond, WI
Posts: 1,794
Re: Moog Front Springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HO455 View Post
I believe we need some more information on your truck and your intentions. Things like tire sizes. Are looking for it to sit flat or raked? Lowered, factory or, lifted?

As far as Suburbans vs trucks the biggest difference in spring rates from the factory would be in the rear. The weight on the front wheels of a Suburban isn't much different than a pick-up but, the rear axle carries five to eight hundred pounds more than a pick-up (Both with no cargo or passengers.)

My opinion is that front spring recommendations from a pick-up will be reasonably acceptable for a Burban. As long as it is apples to apples. In other words if you have a BBC TH400 with A/C and buddy buckets in your Burban, spring recommendations from a 250 3 speed manual short box stripper truck won't be very applicable.

I hope this helps.
Fair enough. It does help. I guess I just figured that most 2wd suburbans, being heavier, would distribute that weight across all springs, not just the rear.

For right now, it has a (non-stock) 307 with a th350. Plans were originally to go with a 5.3l and 4l60e, but may end up going with a 454 and 700r4. I know, 2 totally different weights between them. I'm also not sure if I've got the heavy half front suspension that some of the 72 suburbans got, but I know I need to rebuild the front end too.

I also mic'd the springs that are on there. Show to be .775 wire diameter, so closer to the 6452 springs than either of these.

Thanks again for responding.
__________________
Mike

2001 Dakota R/T - Silver CC - 1 of 1671 •360 w/46RE •392 limited slip
1972 Chevy Suburban - Turquoise/Black
1969 Chevy C/10 - Blue LWB •350 w/ 700R4 •3.73 posi •PS PB A/C - SOLD

Using your turn signal is not "giving information to the enemy"

67-72 FAQ

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMCMAX View Post
My lugnuts require more torque than your honda makes!
nightmare is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com