The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   All 4x4 Tech & Off Roading (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=663541)

Nitis 04-11-2015 02:17 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Not that they are easy to come by but makes a guy wonder if the V6 crossmember would hold an LS. If I recall the V6 was only in GMC?

First c10 04-11-2015 02:19 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
The front passenger side of the crossmember wasabout 1/8" high. I seen where another member just cut and bent down the crossmember. I just thought about adding a piece of 1/8" flat stock

First c10 04-11-2015 02:20 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
Installed and will need to be welded

First c10 04-11-2015 02:21 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
New it needs to be cleaned up and a7/16" hole drilled in crossmember. Then paint.

First c10 04-11-2015 02:23 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
Mocked up and ready for paint.

First c10 04-11-2015 02:28 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitis (Post 7128894)
Not that they are easy to come by but makes a guy wonder if the V6 crossmember would hold an LS. If I recall the V6 was only in GMC?

You know now that I think about it. My grandfather had a old gmc with a v6. And he used to say how mean it was. It was when I was very small. I think any crossmember would hold any motor. The crossmembers just hold the frame together. Not support the engine. Well for me and my way of thinking anyways.
Good stuff.
So that crossmember would only be in 4x4 gmc v6??? Probably not to many compared to the other configurations

Nitis 04-11-2015 02:39 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by First c10 (Post 7128912)
You know now that I think about it. My grandfather had a old gmc with a v6. And he used to say how mean it was. It was when I was very small. I think any crossmember would hold any motor. The crossmembers just hold the frame together. Not support the engine. Well for me and my way of thinking anyways.
Good stuff.
So that crossmember would only be in 4x4 gmc v6??? Probably not to many compared to the other configurations

correct but if the crossmember gets in the way then you get to do all the fun stuff you are doing now!

I havent researched it but I dont ever recall a Chevy V6 of this vintage so as to how rare I dunno.

PortalAxls 04-12-2015 12:43 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
The GMC v6 is hard to get parts for. I found a cotter pin and a rock in 2 of the cylinders, so needless to say the walls were very scored. I would have spent 900+ on custom oversize pistons, so I got an 8.1L out of a 2002 for a steal instead. Thinking of buying the diy4x motor mounts and seeing if this crossmember and mounts will work.

First c10 04-12-2015 12:46 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
I ordered the diy4x Ls motor mounts for the square bodies. I haven't had a chance to see if it would work. Please post up some pictures if you can.
Keep us posted.

americanmusc1e 04-12-2015 10:41 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
http://i714.photobucket.com/albums/w...ps84a4bc6e.jpg

I had to cut a little off the top on mine. It's from an 84 k10 diesel and its in my 69 k20 frame with a sbc

ND_guy 04-12-2015 02:35 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Portalaxls, That looks like the crossmember my pickup had. It was originally a 292 straight six

First c10 04-29-2015 12:42 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
Here is the cross member painted up and sittin in the frame rails.

First c10 04-29-2015 12:46 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
This is front picture. The mounts and crossmember are not bolted in yet. I had to move the crossmember forward than I was expecting. But it clears nicely. I will take pictures when bolted in.

7dee2 04-29-2015 10:53 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Do you think you'll need to modify the right front corner of the crossmember or shim it some more to match the frame rail since you had to move it all forward?

First c10 04-29-2015 11:03 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 7dee2 (Post 7153027)
Do you think you'll need to modify the right front corner of the crossmember or shim it some more to match the frame rail since you had to move it all forward?

Brett,
Not sure what you mean about shimming? are you talking about the crossmember where it sits in the frame rail??? like the area I added the 1/8" plate?

Right know I have it about center of the frame and level side to side. I need to check front to back before I can mark and drill the holes.

BigRed76 04-29-2015 12:56 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
I have to ask, what is this bracket?

First c10 04-29-2015 01:23 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRed76 (Post 7153166)
I have to ask, what is this bracket?

Zach that is an Off-Road Design Steering box brace. It is needed on the old frames after years of abuse(my frame front crossmember rivets were loose and I had to replace them with new grade 8 bolt as you can see in the picture.) or if you plan to run a larger tire. Crossover steering would also be good but for me it would be overkill.



Steering brace

7dee2 04-29-2015 11:38 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by First c10 (Post 7153039)
Brett,
Not sure what you mean about shimming? are you talking about the crossmember where it sits in the frame rail??? like the area I added the 1/8" plate?

Right know I have it about center of the frame and level side to side. I need to check front to back before I can mark and drill the holes.

Yes, exactly where you had added the 1/8" plate.

First c10 04-29-2015 11:53 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Well I am going to put a 1" spacer between the crossmember and the pedestals to clear the oil pan in case I need to remove it without removing the motor. If I needs adjust I will post it.

First c10 05-01-2015 05:02 PM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
Ok so more to come with this 73-87 crossmember idea..... I found a problem when trying to keep the motor in the correct location front to back, side to side it fits great.
A section of the crossmember almost hits the corner of the oil pan where the bolt that holds the crossover wiring under the crank pulley. It will have to be clearance'd. I will try and explain soon.

First c10 05-07-2015 12:33 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
Well I finally got the motor installed with the 73-87 cross member. A little work but got it in.
This picture is where the front driver side pan it.

First c10 05-07-2015 12:35 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
This is the first hole I cut in the crossmember. Still need some clearanceing

First c10 05-07-2015 12:36 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
Front the front

First c10 05-07-2015 12:38 AM

Re: 67-72 front crossmember VS squarebody
 
1 Attachment(s)
This is how much I had to clearance. Now I can even use the factory wiring harness cross over loom. I forgot to take a picture after the motor was installed.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com