The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2014, 08:32 PM   #26
captain69
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: illinois
Posts: 72
Re: drive shaft alignment problems

Lower 5 inches in rear eibach springs front eibach 2 inch springs 2 1/2 drop spindles
captain69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 10:43 AM   #27
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,166
Re: drive shaft alignment problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by davepl View Post

But as for U-Joints, it is completely irrelevant how it looks (within reason). It does not matter what the angle is. What matters is that the angle is the EXACT same angle as the other end
Almost. It has to be the exact same angle but in the opposite direction. I hope/think this is what you meant.

The reason is because each time the u joint passes it maximum articulation it creates a disturbance. The rotation creates a disurbance that is sinusoidal in shape.

If the two u joints are at maximum articulation in the same direction then the amplitudes are additive (they double). If the joints are articulating in the opposite direction then the amplitudes cancel out and the net effect is zero.

I can't draw pics here but I will post the attached for reference. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=522180 Figure 4-20

Captain69 - you may want to peruse/memorize/become very familiar with the attached link.


K
Attached Images
 
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/

Last edited by Keith Seymore; 08-09-2014 at 10:56 AM.
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 02:38 PM   #28
davepl
Registered User
 
davepl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,332
Re: drive shaft alignment problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
It has to be the exact same angle but in the opposite direction. I hope/think this is what you meant.
It is.
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible
davepl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 08:58 PM   #29
captain69
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: illinois
Posts: 72
Re: drive shaft alignment problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
Almost. It has to be the exact same angle but in the opposite direction. I hope/think this is what you meant.

The reason is because each time the u joint passes it maximum articulation it creates a disturbance. The rotation creates a disurbance that is sinusoidal in shape.

If the two u joints are at maximum articulation in the same direction then the amplitudes are additive (they double). If the joints are articulating in the opposite direction then the amplitudes cancel out and the net effect is zero.

I can't draw pics here but I will post the attached for reference. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=522180 Figure 4-20

Captain69 - you may want to peruse/memorize/become very familiar with the attached link.


K

Great article thank you.
captain69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 09:54 PM   #30
ItsRandy
Registered User
 
ItsRandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Grand Terrace, Ca.
Posts: 1,607
Re: drive shaft alignment problems

What was wrong with the stock cross member? I have a '69 C-10 which was a small block/TH350 truck w/low hump cab. It is now a BB 502 w/4L80E using the stock automatic cross member and I have plenty of room between the floor and trans.
I too think the trans yolk needs to be farther in the trans.

Oh...ya gotta' love Keith!
Attached Images
 
ItsRandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com